World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
74
Citations
16039
World Ranking
19499
National Ranking
658

Glyn G. Jamieson publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Glyn G. Jamieson sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 383 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Glyn G. Jamieson D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Glyn G. Jamieson sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

    Glyn G. Jamieson;David I. Watson;Robert Britten-Jones;Phlip C. Mitchell

  • A learning curve for laparoscopic fundoplication. Definable, avoidable, or a waste of time?

    David I. Watson;Robert J. Baigrie;Glyn G. Jamieson

  • Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: five-year results and beyond.

    Thiery Lafullarde;David I. Watson;Glyn G. Jamieson;Jennifer C. Myers

  • Prospective Double-Blind Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication With Division and Without Division of Short Gastric Vessels

    David I. Watson;Gregory K. Pike;Gregory K. Pike;Robert J. Baigrie;Robert J. Baigrie;George Mathew;George Mathew

  • Postoperative mortality following oesophagectomy and problems in reporting its rate

    G G Jamieson;G Mathew;R Ludemann;J Wayman

  • Prospective randomized double-blind trial between laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and anterior partial fundoplication.

    D. I. Watson;G. G. Jamieson;G. K. Pike;N. Davies

  • Gasless laparoscopy may reduce the risk of port-site metastases following laparascopic tumor surgery.

    David I Watson;George Mathew;Tanya Ellis;Carolyn F Baigrie

  • Systematic review of the safety and effectiveness of methods used to establish pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery.

    T L Merlin;J E Hiller;G J Maddern;G J Maddern;G G Jamieson

  • Factors Associated with Postoperative Pulmonary Morbidity After Esophagectomy for Cancer

    Urs Zingg;Bernard M. Smithers;David C. Gotley;Garett Smith

  • Antireflux surgery in the laparoscopic era

    D I Watson;G G Jamieson

  • Paraoesophageal hiatus hernia: an important complication of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

    D. I. Watson;G. G. Jamieson;P. G. Devitt;P. C. Mitchell

  • Wound metastases following laparoscopic and open surgery for abdominal cancer in a rat model

    G Mathew;D I Watson;A M Rofe;C F Baigrie

  • Laparoscopic Repair of Very Large Hiatus Hernia With Sutures Versus Absorbable Mesh Versus Nonabsorbable Mesh A Randomized Controlled Trial

    David I. Watson;Sarah K. Thompson;Peter G. Devitt;Lorelle Smith

  • Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer

    Urs Zingg;Alexander McQuinn;Dennis DiValentino;Adrian J. Esterman

  • Abnormalities of esophageal and gastric emptying in progressive systemic sclerosis

    Guy J. Maddern;Guy J. Maddern;Guy J. Maddern;Michael Horowitz;Michael Horowitz;Michael Horowitz;Glyn G. Jamieson;Glyn G. Jamieson;Glyn G. Jamieson;Barry E. Chatterton;Barry E. Chatterton;Barry E. Chatterton

  • Multicenter, prospective, double-blind, randomized trial of laparoscopic nissen vs anterior 90 degrees partial fundoplication.

    David I. Watson;Glyn G. Jamieson;Carolyn Lally;Stephen Archer

  • Five-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic total versus anterior 180° fundoplication

    R Ludemann;D I Watson;G G Jamieson;P A Game

  • Ten-year clinical outcome of a prospective randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic Nissen versus anterior 180° partial fundoplication

    W Cai;D I Watson;C J Lally;C J Lally;P G Devitt

  • Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication: Clinical Outcomes at 10 Years

    Jamie J. Kelly;David I. Watson;Kin Fah Chin;Peter G. Devitt

  • Totally endoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy

    D. I. Watson;N. Davies;G. G. Jamieson

Frequent Co-Authors

David I. Watson
David I. Watson Flinders Medical Centre
Guy J. Maddern
Guy J. Maddern University of Adelaide
Michael Horowitz
Michael Horowitz University of Adelaide
Larry R. Kaiser
Larry R. Kaiser Temple University
Peter Roberts-Thomson
Peter Roberts-Thomson Flinders Medical Centre
John A. Windsor
John A. Windsor University of Auckland
Stephen L. Archer
Stephen L. Archer Queen's University
David Lamb
David Lamb University of New England
Peter-John Wormald
Peter-John Wormald University of Adelaide
Vincenzo Savarino
Vincenzo Savarino University of Genoa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The pathway to a career in medicine or healthcare does not always require a traditional, on-campus experience. Many students explore alternative degree options that offer flexibility and affordability. For example, those seeking advanced nursing roles may consider affordable np programs as a practical solution for balancing work and study.

For individuals just starting, affordability is a key factor. Prospective nurses often ask, what is the cheapest online college for nursing? Fortunately, there are several accredited programs designed to minimize student debt while providing a high-quality education.

Nurses looking to advance their credentials even further might explore the cheapest phd nursing programs, which open doors to academic, research, and leadership opportunities in healthcare.

Similarly, registered nurses aiming to earn their bachelor's degree can opt for one of the most affordable accredited online rn to bsn programs. This pathway is ideal for RNs looking to expand clinical expertise and career prospects without breaking the bank.

Best Scientists Citing Glyn G. Jamieson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles