World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 77 18340 17230 9150 8454 471 24828

John G. Hunter publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John G. Hunter between 1970 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John G. Hunter published across 57 years, from 1970 to 2026, averaging 8.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2017. 7 of the 486 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2017. 1970: 1 publication 1971: 1 publication 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 4 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 11 publications 1992: 12 publications 1993: 10 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 17 publications 1996: 15 publications 1997: 20 publications 1998: 16 publications 1999: 15 publications 2000: 15 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 18 publications 2007: 22 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 22 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 23 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 6 publications 2026: 1 publication
1970 2026

486 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John G. Hunter: publications per year, 1970 to 2026
Year Publications
1970 1
1971 1
1972 1
1973 0
1974 1
1975 1
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 5
1985 2
1986 2
1987 1
1988 1
1989 4
1990 3
1991 11
1992 12
1993 10
1994 3
1995 17
1996 15
1997 20
1998 16
1999 15
2000 15
2001 11
2002 11
2003 11
2004 10
2005 13
2006 18
2007 22
2008 16
2009 21
2010 22
2011 20
2012 13
2013 14
2014 12
2015 20
2016 20
2017 23
2018 12
2019 10
2020 7
2021 6
2022 2
2023 4
2024 4
2025 6
2026 1
Total 486
Download as CSV

John G. Hunter publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John G. Hunter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 461–480 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 471 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751 471
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

John G. Hunter D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John G. Hunter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76–77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730 77
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

John G. Hunter is affiliated with Oregon Health & Science University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a significant emphasis on Complementary and alternative medicine. Additional areas of study include Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pharmacology, and Psychiatry and Mental health.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Empathy and Medical Education
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Trace Elements in Health
  • Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies
  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

John G. Hunter has published extensively in scientific journals, contributing to a variety of journals with multiple articles. Frequent publication venues include:

  • European Journal of Integrative Medicine
  • Integrative Medicine Research
  • Advances in Integrative Medicine
  • Global Advances in Health and Medicine
  • The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine

The following are some of their recent papers, including full titles, years of publication, and publication venues:

  • Tai Chi for health and well-being: A bibliometric analysis of published clinical studies between 2010 and 2020, 2021, Complementary Therapies in Medicine
  • Zinc for the prevention or treatment of acute viral respiratory tract infections in adults: a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials, 2021, BMJ Open
  • Experiences of care for self-harm in the emergency department: comparison of the perspectives of patients, carers and practitioners, 2021, BJPsych Open
  • Zinc for the prevention and treatment of SARS-CoV-2 and other acute viral respiratory infections: a rapid review, 2020, Advances in Integrative Medicine
  • Determining the safety and effectiveness of Tai Chi: a critical overview of 210 systematic reviews of controlled clinical trials, 2022, Systematic Reviews

John G. Hunter collaborates frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Guoyan Yang
  • Susan Arentz
  • Joanna Harnett
  • Joshua Z. Goldenberg
  • Carolyn Ee

Best Publications

  • Radiofrequency Ablation in Barrett's Esophagus with Dysplasia

    Nicholas J Shaheen;Prateek Sharma;Bergein F. Overholt;Herbert C. Wolfsen

  • Causes and Prevention of Laparoscopic Bile Duct Injuries: Analysis of 252 Cases From a Human Factors and Cognitive Psychology Perspective

    Lawrence W. Way;Lygia Stewart;Walter Gantert;Kingsway Liu

  • Laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias: nine years' experience with 850 consecutive hernias.

    B. Todd Heniford;Adrian Park;Adrian Park;Bruce J. Ramshaw;Guy Voeller

  • Gallstones and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

    John L. Gollan;Gregory B. Bulkley;Anna Mae Diehl;Janet D. Elashoff

  • A critical review of the diagnosis and management of Barrett’s esophagus: the AGA Chicago Workshop

    Prateek Sharma;Kenneth McQuaid;John Dent;M. Brian Fennerty

  • A physiologic approach to laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

    John Hunter;Ted Trus;Gene Branum;J. Waring

  • Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a national survey.

    Stephen Archer;David Brown;C. Smith;Gene Branum

  • A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy

    Adrian E. Ortega;John G. Hunter;Jeffrey H. Peters;Lee L. Swanstrom

  • Biologic prosthesis reduces recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial.

    Brant K. Oelschlager;Carlos A. Pellegrini;John Hunter;Nathaniel Soper

  • Durability of Radiofrequency Ablation in Barrett's Esophagus With Dysplasia

    Nicholas J Shaheen;Bergein F. Overholt;Richard E. Sampliner;Herbert C. Wolfsen

  • Biologic prosthesis to prevent recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: long-term follow-up from a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial.

    Brant K. Oelschlager;Carlos A. Pellegrini;John G. Hunter;Michael L. Brunt

  • Mesh complications after prosthetic reinforcement of hiatal closure: A 28-case series

    Rudolf J. Stadlhuber;Amr El Sherif;Sumeet K. Mittal;Robert J. Fitzgibbons

  • Worldwide esophageal cancer collaboration.

    T. W. Rice;V. W. Rusch;C. Apperson-Hansen;M. S. Allen

  • Laparoscopic Fundoplication Failures: Patterns of Failure and Response to Fundoplication Revision

    John G. Hunter;C. Daniel Smith;Gene D. Branum;J. Patrick Waring

  • Transoral, flexible endoscopic suturing for treatment of GERD: a multicenter trial.

    Charles J. Filipi;Glen A. Lehman;Richard I. Rothstein;Isaac Raijman

  • Dysphagia after laparoscopic antireflux surgery. The impact of operative technique.

    John Hunter;Lee Swanstrom;J. Waring

  • Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy and Fundoplication for Achalasia

    John Hunter;Thadeus Trus;Gene Branum;J. Waring

  • Avoidance of bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

    John G. Hunter

  • Who will fail laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication? Preoperative prediction of long-term outcomes

    Craig B. Morgenthal;Edward Lin;Matthew D. Shane;John G. Hunter

  • Carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum induces fetal acidosis in a pregnant ewe model.

    J. G. Hunter;L. Swanstrom;K. Thornburg

Frequent Co-Authors

Lee L. Swanstrom
Lee L. Swanstrom Institute of Image-Guided Surgery
Nathaniel J. Soper
Nathaniel J. Soper Northwestern University
Alfred Cuschieri
Alfred Cuschieri University of Dundee
John L. Cameron
John L. Cameron Johns Hopkins University
Stuart J. Spechler
Stuart J. Spechler Baylor University Medical Center
Mark A. Talamini
Mark A. Talamini Stony Brook University
Randall W. Burt
Randall W. Burt University of Utah
Keith D. Lillemoe
Keith D. Lillemoe Harvard University
Peter J. Kahrilas
Peter J. Kahrilas Northwestern University
Arnold G. Coran
Arnold G. Coran University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a medical career in the USA opens up a wide array of related online degrees and alternative pathways tailored to diverse professional goals. For those seeking to advance quickly, there are fast track lpn programs designed to help you become a Licensed Practical Nurse in less time than traditional courses.

If your interest lies in leadership or healthcare administration, you can access the cheapest online health science degree programs, making this field more affordable and flexible.

Enhanced specializations are also available for working nurses. For example, those wanting to complete a doctoral degree without direct patient care can look for a dnp program without clinical hours.

Mental health is a growing area of need in medicine. Nurses with a master’s degree can qualify as psychiatric nurse practitioners swiftly by enrolling in shortest post master's pmhnp online programs.

These online degrees offer flexibility, faster timelines, and affordable options for individuals looking to make an impact in healthcare beyond the traditional MD route.

Best Scientists Citing John G. Hunter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles