World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
78
Citations
25113
World Ranking
17954
National Ranking
8953

Mark A. Talamini publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. Talamini sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 442 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Mark A. Talamini D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. Talamini sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark A. Talamini is affiliated with Stony Brook University in the United States. Their research is focused predominantly in the field of Medicine, with a significant number of publications contributing to the subfields of Surgery, Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The scientist's main research topics include:

  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Surgical Simulation and Training
  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Hernia Repair and Management
  • Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
  • COVID-19 and Healthcare Impacts

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Mark A. Talamini are:

  • Aurora D. Pryor
  • Jie Yang
  • Konstantinos Spaniolas
  • Jerry A. Rubano
  • Salvatore Docimo

The scientist's work has been published extensively in various venues, with the most frequent publication venues being:

  • Surgical Endoscopy
  • Annals of Surgery
  • Hernia
  • Annals of Surgical Oncology
  • Advances in Surgery

Some of Mark A. Talamini's recent papers include:

  • "Pancreatic Cancer Patient-derived Organoids Can Predict Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy" (2022), published in Annals of Surgery
  • "Acute Gastrointestinal Injury and Feeding Intolerance as Prognostic Factors in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients" (2021), published in Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
  • "D-Dimer-Driven Anticoagulation Reduces Mortality in Intubated COVID-19 Patients: A Cohort Study With a Propensity-Matched Analysis" (2021), published in Frontiers in Medicine
  • "Trends in the Utilization and Perioperative Outcomes of Primary Robotic Bariatric Surgery from 2015 to 2018: A Study of 46,764 Patients from the MBSAQIP Data Registry" (2020), published in Surgical Endoscopy
  • "Development of Cancer After Bariatric Surgery" (2020), published in Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases

Best Publications

  • Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes.

    Charles J. Yeo;John L. Cameron;Taylor A. Sohn;Keith D. Lillemoe

  • A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy

    Charles J. Yeo;John L. Cameron;Michael M. Maher;Patricia K. Sauter

  • A telerobotic assistant for laparoscopic surgery

    R.H. Taylor;J. Funda;B. Eldridge;S. Gomory

  • Surgical Management of Bile Duct Injuries Sustained During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Perioperative Results in 200 Patients

    Jason K. Sicklick;Melissa S. Camp;Keith D. Lillemoe;Genevieve B. Melton

  • Postoperative bile duct strictures: management and outcome in the 1990s.

    Keith D. Lillemoe;Genevieve B. Melton;John L. Cameron;Henry A. Pitt;Henry A. Pitt

  • Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome: Evaluation with CT Angiography

    Karen M. Horton;Mark A. Talamini;Elliot K. Fishman

  • Surgical Rates and Operative Mortality for Open and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Maryland

    Claudia A. Steiner;Eric B. Bass;Mark A. Talamini;Henry A. Pitt

  • Transgastric endoscopic splenectomy: is it possible?

    S. V. Kantsevoy;B. Hu;S. B. Jagannath;C. A. Vaughn

  • Robotic abdominal surgery

    Eric J. Hanly;Eric J. Hanly;Mark A. Talamini

  • A prospective analysis of 211 robotic-assisted surgical procedures

    M. A. Talamini;S. Chapman;S. Horgan;W. S. Melvin

  • Adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. A 28-year experience.

    Mark A. Talamini;Robert C. Moesinger;Henry A. Pitt;Taylor A. Sohn

  • Early total parenteral nutrition in acute pancreatitis: lack of beneficial effects.

    Harry C. Sax;Brad W. Warner;Mark A. Talamini;Frederick N. Hamilton

  • Gallbladder cancer: the role of laparoscopy and radical resection.

    Samuel P. Shih;Richard D. Schulick;John L. Cameron;Keith D. Lillemoe

  • Major bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Follow-up after combined surgical and radiologic management.

    Keith D. Lillemoe;Scot A. Martin;John L. Cameron;Charles J. Yeo

  • Pathologic examination accurately predicts prognosis in mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas.

    Robb E. Wilentz;Jorge Albores-Saavedra;Marianna Zahurak;Mark A. Talamini

  • Traditional versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

    Thomas R. Gadacz;Mark A. Talamini

  • Examining a Common Disease with Unknown Etiology: Trends in Epidemiology and Surgical Management of Appendicitis in California, 1995–2009

    Jamie E. Anderson;Stephen W. Bickler;David C. Chang;Mark A. Talamini

  • Should pancreaticoduodenectomy be performed in octogenarians

    Taylor A. Sohn;Charles J. Yeo;John L. Cameron;Keith D. Lillemoe

  • Cystadenomas of the pancreas: is enucleation an adequate operation?

    Mark A. Talamini;Robert Moesinger;Charles J. Yeo;Benjamin Poulose

  • Postoperative Enteral vs Parenteral Nutrition: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Robert H. Bower;Mark A. Talamini;Harry C. Sax;Frederick Hamilton

Frequent Co-Authors

David C. Chang
David C. Chang Massachusetts General Hospital
Keith D. Lillemoe
Keith D. Lillemoe Harvard University
Michael Bouvet
Michael Bouvet University of California, San Diego
Charles J. Yeo
Charles J. Yeo Thomas Jefferson University
Robert M. Hoffman
Robert M. Hoffman AntiCancer (United States)
John L. Cameron
John L. Cameron Johns Hopkins University
Lee L. Swanstrom
Lee L. Swanstrom Institute of Image-Guided Surgery
Josef E. Fischer
Josef E. Fischer University of Cincinnati
Alfred Cuschieri
Alfred Cuschieri University of Dundee
Ralph H. Hruban
Ralph H. Hruban Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring medical professionals in the USA have a range of online degrees and alternative career pathways to consider. For registered nurses looking to advance their education without traditional in-person requirements, rn to bsn without clinicals programs provide flexibility and convenience, making higher qualifications more accessible.

Those interested in pursuing advanced practice or leadership roles often seek the most efficient routes to a doctorate. The shortest online dnp program options allow practicing nurses to reach their goals swiftly, minimizing time away from work and family. If ease of program completion is crucial, checking experiences and recommendations—like those found in discussions on the easiest dnp program reddit—can help candidates choose the right fit.

For those seeking to enter the medical field quickly, accelerated courses such as a 9 month lpn program online offer fast-track opportunities. These programs are ideal for students who want to start working sooner and gain hands-on healthcare experience.

Best Scientists Citing Mark A. Talamini

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles