World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
100
Citations
35614
World Ranking
8294
National Ranking
810

Philip N. Baker publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip N. Baker sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 703 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Philip N. Baker D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip N. Baker sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 100 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Philip N. Baker is a researcher affiliated with the University of Leicester in the United Kingdom. Their academic work primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with significant contributions to subfields such as Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Immunology.

The main topics of their research include:

  • Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Birth, Development, and Health
  • Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction

Their recent papers demonstrate a focus on maternal health, pregnancy outcomes, and infectious disease impact during pregnancy. These include:

  • "Prenatal anxiety and obstetric decisions among pregnant women in Wuhan and Chongqing during the COVID-19 outbreak: a cross-sectional study" (2020) published in BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
  • "Altered gut bacterial and metabolic signatures and their interaction in gestational diabetes mellitus" (2020) published in Gut Microbes
  • "Safe delivery for pregnancies affected by COVID-19" (2020) published in BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
  • "Advanced Maternal Age-associated SIRT1 Deficiency Compromises Trophoblast Epithelial−Mesenchymal Transition through an Increase in Vimentin Acetylation" (2021) published in Aging Cell
  • "Advanced maternal age causes premature placental senescence and malformation via dysregulated α-Klotho expression in trophoblasts" (2021) published in Aging Cell

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Philip N. Baker include:

  • Chao Tong
  • Richard Saffery
  • Mark D. Kilby
  • Hongbo Qi
  • Li Wen

Their research has been published extensively in a range of scientific venues. The most common publication outlets for their work are:

  • Scientific Reports
  • PLoS ONE
  • BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
  • BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
  • HRB Open Research

Best Publications

  • The Pathophysiology of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

    Jasmine F Plows;Joanna L Stanley;Philip N Baker;Clare M Reynolds

  • Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure

    S. J. Gordijn;I. M. Beune;B. Thilaganathan;A. Papageorghiou

  • The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement: DATA FROM THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY FOR ENGLAND AND WALES

    P. N. Baker;J. H. van der Meulen;J. Lewsey;P. J. Gregg

  • Higher risk of offspring schizophrenia following antenatal maternal exposure to severe adverse life events.

    Ali S. Khashan;Kathryn M. Abel;Roseanne McNamee;Marianne G. Pedersen

  • Placental apoptosis in normal human pregnancy

    Stephen Smith;Philip N. Baker;E.Malcolm Symonds

  • Clinical risk prediction for pre-eclampsia in nulliparous women: development of model in international prospective cohort

    Robyn A North;Lesley M E McCowan;Gustaaf A Dekker;Lucilla Poston

  • Increased placental apoptosis in intrauterine growth restriction

    Stephen C. Smith;Philip N. Baker;E.Malcolm Symonds

  • The pre-eclampsia community guideline (PRECOG): how to screen for and detect onset of pre-eclampsia in the community

    Fiona Milne;Chris Redman;James Walker;Philip Baker

  • A three-year follow-up of children imaged in utero with echo-planar magnetic resonance

    Philip N. Baker;Ian R. Johnson;Paul R. Harvey;Penny A. Gowland

  • Increased placental apoptosis in pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia.

    Danny N. Leung;Stephen C. Smith;K.F. To;Daljit S. Sahota

  • Uterine natural killer cells initiate spiral artery remodeling in human pregnancy

    Andrew Robson;Lynda K. Harris;Barbara A. Innes;Gendie E. Lash

  • Robust Early Pregnancy Prediction of Later Preeclampsia Using Metabolomic Biomarkers

    Louise C. Kenny;David I. Broadhurst;Warwick Dunn;Marie Brown

  • Stereological investigation of placental morphology in pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia with and without intrauterine growth restriction.

    T.M Mayhew;C Ohadike;P.N Baker;I.P Crocker

  • Differences in Apoptotic Susceptibility of Cytotrophoblasts and Syncytiotrophoblasts in Normal Pregnancy to Those Complicated with Preeclampsia and Intrauterine Growth Restriction

    Ian P. Crocker;Suzanne Cooper;Stephen C. Ong;Philip N. Baker

  • Nitric Oxide Produced by Endothelial Cells Increases Production of Eicosanoids Through Activation of Prostaglandin H Synthase

    Sandra T. Davidge;Philip N. Baker;Margaret K. McLaughlin;James M. Roberts

  • Early Pregnancy Prediction of Preeclampsia in Nulliparous Women, Combining Clinical Risk and Biomarkers The Screening for Pregnancy Endpoints (SCOPE) International Cohort Study

    Louise C. Kenny;Michael A. Black;Lucilla Poston;Rennae Taylor

  • Elevated serum levels of vascular endothelial growth factor in patients with preeclampsia

    Philip N. Baker;Joel Krasnow;Joel Krasnow;James M. Roberts;James M. Roberts;Kiang-Teck Yeo;Kiang-Teck Yeo

  • A prospective study of micronutrient status in adolescent pregnancy

    Philip N Baker;Simon J Wheeler;Tom A Sanders;Jane E Thomas

  • Formation of syncytial knots is increased by hyperoxia, hypoxia and reactive oxygen species

    A.E.P. Heazell;S.J. Moll;C.J.P. Jones;P.N. Baker

  • Uterine spiral artery remodeling involves endothelial apoptosis induced by extravillous trophoblasts through Fas/FasL interactions

    Sandra V. Ashton;Guy St. J. Whitley;Philip R. Dash;Mark Wareing

Frequent Co-Authors

Louise C. Kenny
Louise C. Kenny University of Liverpool
Penny A. Gowland
Penny A. Gowland University of Nottingham
Lucilla Poston
Lucilla Poston King's College London
John D. Aplin
John D. Aplin University of Manchester
Keith M. Godfrey
Keith M. Godfrey University of Southampton
Richard Saffery
Richard Saffery University of Melbourne
Douglas B. Kell
Douglas B. Kell University of Liverpool
Mark D. Kilby
Mark D. Kilby University of Birmingham
Zarko Alfirevic
Zarko Alfirevic University of Liverpool
David Broadhurst
David Broadhurst University of Alberta

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens up a range of online degree options and alternative career pathways. For nurses aiming to advance their careers, enrolling in dnp programs online provides an opportunity to achieve the highest level of nursing practice with flexibility for working professionals.

For those who want to enter the healthcare workforce quickly, accelerated lpn pathways allow students to become Licensed Practical Nurses faster, often blending online coursework with in-person clinicals.

If you are drawn to mental health services, consider accelerated msn psychiatric np programs online. These programs are designed for nurses seeking advanced roles in psychiatric and mental health care, helping meet growing demand for specialists.

Alternatively, if you’re interested in healthcare leadership, a health administration degree online can prepare you for management roles within medical facilities. These flexible online degrees make it easier to balance education with work and life.

Best Scientists Citing Philip N. Baker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles