World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
80
Citations
24713
World Ranking
17064
National Ranking
1547

Mark D. Kilby publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark D. Kilby sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 531 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Mark D. Kilby D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark D. Kilby sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark D. Kilby is affiliated with the University of Birmingham in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with significant contributions across subfields such as Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Genetics, Molecular Biology, and Epidemiology.

The scientist's work encompasses a range of main topics including:

  • Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
  • Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
  • Birth, Development, and Health
  • Blood groups and transfusion
  • Parvovirus B19 Infection Studies

Mark D. Kilby has co-authored numerous publications with frequent collaborators such as Philip N. Baker, Chao Tong, Richard Saffery, Li Wen, and Fionnuala Mone. The scientist's work is published predominantly in specific academic journals including:

  • Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (17 publications)
  • Prenatal Diagnosis (10 publications)
  • BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (7 publications)
  • The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (5 publications)
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (4 publications)

Among notable papers, the following are identified with publication year and venue:

  • "Genetic predisposition to hypertension is associated with preeclampsia in European and Central Asian women," 2020, Nature Communications
  • "COngenital heart disease and the Diagnostic yield with Exome sequencing (CODE) study: prospective cohort study and systematic review," 2020, Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • "Advanced Maternal Age-associated SIRT1 Deficiency Compromises Trophoblast Epithelial−Mesenchymal Transition through an Increase in Vimentin Acetylation," 2021, Aging Cell
  • "Advanced maternal age causes premature placental senescence and malformation via dysregulated α-Klotho expression in trophoblasts," 2021, Aging Cell
  • "Nipocalimab in Early-Onset Severe Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn," 2024, New England Journal of Medicine

Best Publications

  • Normal human pregnancy is associated with an elevation in the immune suppressive CD25+ CD4+ regulatory T-cell subset.

    David A Somerset;Yong Zheng;Mark D Kilby;David M Sansom

  • Association Between Thyroid Autoantibodies and Miscarriage and Preterm Birth: Meta-analysis of Evidence

    S. Thangaratinam;A. Tan;E. Knox;M.D. Kilby

  • Prenatal exome sequencing analysis in fetal structural anomalies detected by ultrasonography (PAGE): a cohort study

    Jenny Lord;Dominic J McMullan;Ruth Y Eberhardt;Gabriele Rinck

  • Differential Regulation of Vitamin D Receptor and Its Ligand in Human Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells

    Martin Hewison;Lisa Freeman;Susan V. Hughes;Katie N. Evans

  • ISUOG Practice Guidelines: role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy.

    A. Khalil;M. Rodgers;A. Baschat;A. Bhide

  • Expert consensus document: Clinical and molecular diagnosis, screening and management of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome: an international consensus statement.

    Frédéric Brioude;Jennifer M Kalish;Alessandro Mussa;Alison C Foster;Alison C Foster

  • Vitamin D and placental-decidual function.

    Katie N. Evans;Judith N. Bulmer;Judith N. Bulmer;Mark D. Kilby;Mark D. Kilby;Martin Hewison;Martin Hewison

  • Percutaneous vesicoamniotic shunting versus conservative management for fetal lower urinary tract obstruction (PLUTO): a randomised trial.

    Rachel K Morris;Gemma L Malin;Elisabeth Quinlan-Jones;Lee J Middleton

  • Prognosis for the co-twin following single-twin death: a systematic review.

    Ssc Ong;J Zamora;KS Khan;Kilby

  • Reduced Placental 11β-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type 2 mRNA Levels in Human Pregnancies Complicated by Intrauterine Growth Restriction: An Analysis of Possible Mechanisms

    C. L. McTernan;N. Draper;H. Nicholson;S. M. Chalder

  • Use of prenatal chromosomal microarray: prospective cohort study and systematic review and meta-analysis

    S. C. Hillman;D. J. McMullan;G. Hall;F. S. Togneri

  • Fetoscopic laser coagulation of the vascular equator versus selective coagulation for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: an open-label randomised controlled trial

    Femke Slaghekke;Enrico Lopriore;Liesbeth Lewi;Johanna M Middeldorp

  • A Randomized Trial of Progesterone in Women with Recurrent Miscarriages

    Arri Coomarasamy;Helen Williams;Ewa Truchanowicz;Paul T Seed

  • 11Beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 in human pregnancy and reduced expression in intrauterine growth restriction.

    M Shams;M D Kilby;D A Somerset;A J Howie

  • Effects of 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 and 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 on Cytokine Production by Human Decidual Cells

    Katie N. Evans;Lisa Nguyen;Junny Chan;Barbara A. Innes

  • Hypoplastic left heart syndrome

    David J Barron;Mark D Kilby;Ben Davies;John G C Wright

  • Interventions for the treatment of twin‐twin transfusion syndrome

    Devender Roberts;James P Neilson;Mark D Kilby;Simon Gates

  • Additional information from array comparative genomic hybridization technology over conventional karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    S. C. Hillman;S. Pretlove;A. Coomarasamy;D. J. Mcmullan

  • Prenatal exome sequencing analysis in fetal structural anomalies detected by ultrasonography (PAGE): a cohort study

    Lord J;McMullan Dj;Eberhardt Ry;Rinck G

  • Expert consensus document: Clinical and molecular diagnosis, screening and management of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome: an international consensus statement

    Brioude F;Kalish Jm;Mussa A;Foster Ac

Frequent Co-Authors

Jayne A. Franklyn
Jayne A. Franklyn University of Birmingham
Martin Hewison
Martin Hewison University of Birmingham
Philip N. Baker
Philip N. Baker University of Leicester
Eamonn R. Maher
Eamonn R. Maher University of Cambridge
Khalid S. Khan
Khalid S. Khan University of Granada
Paul Moss
Paul Moss University of Birmingham
Richard Saffery
Richard Saffery University of Melbourne
Judith N. Bulmer
Judith N. Bulmer Newcastle University
Matthew E. Hurles
Matthew E. Hurles Wellcome Sanger Institute
Andrew Shennan
Andrew Shennan King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore studying Medicine in the USA, it's important to know there are diverse online degree paths that can support your career in healthcare. Options range from advanced nursing to healthcare leadership, each offering flexibility and affordability for students.

For nursing professionals aiming to specialize quickly, the shortest online pmhnp programs allow you to become a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner in less time, helping you fast-track your impact in mental health care.

If you're interested in the business side of healthcare, pursuing a health administration degree can prepare you for administrative, policy, or management roles. You can find the cheapest online mha options to ensure your education remains cost-effective.

For clinically experienced nurses aspiring to the highest levels of practice, the best dnp programs online offer flexible pathways to boost your credentials without putting your career on hold.

These online programs provide accessible, respected options to advance your healthcare career while balancing work and life commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Mark D. Kilby

Trending Scientists