World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 85 14733 1351 305 22986

Judith N. Bulmer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Judith N. Bulmer between 1983 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Judith N. Bulmer published across 40 years, from 1983 to 2022, averaging 7.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2004. 3 of the 307 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2004. 1983: 2 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 6 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 9 publications 1988: 8 publications 1989: 8 publications 1990: 9 publications 1991: 9 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 8 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 18 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 17 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 2 publications 2022: 1 publication
1983 2022

307 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Judith N. Bulmer: publications per year, 1983 to 2022
Year Publications
1983 2
1984 2
1985 6
1986 4
1987 9
1988 8
1989 8
1990 9
1991 9
1992 7
1993 8
1994 4
1995 10
1996 4
1997 2
1998 10
1999 10
2000 1
2001 8
2002 7
2003 11
2004 18
2005 13
2006 14
2007 17
2008 7
2009 10
2010 15
2011 11
2012 10
2013 11
2014 4
2015 8
2016 5
2017 2
2018 2
2019 17
2020 1
2021 2
2022 1
Total 307
Download as CSV

Judith N. Bulmer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Judith N. Bulmer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 301–320 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 305 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834 305
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Judith N. Bulmer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Judith N. Bulmer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003 85
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Judith N. Bulmer was affiliated with Newcastle University in the United Kingdom. Their research focused on multiple areas within medicine, particularly in obstetrics and gynecology, immunology, and reproductive medicine.

The scientist contributed to studies related to reproductive system and pregnancy, endometriosis research and treatment, uterine myomas and treatments, gynecological conditions and treatments, ovarian function and disorders, pregnancy and preeclampsia studies, and maternal and fetal healthcare.

Among their recent publications were:

  • "Are we managing women with Recurrent Miscarriage appropriately? A snapshot survey of clinical practice within the United Kingdom," 2020, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
  • "Transient loss of endothelial cells in human spiral artery remodelling during early pregnancy: Challenging the dogma," 2020, Placenta
  • "Transforming Growth Factor (TGF) β and Endometrial Vascular Maturation," 2021, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
  • "Platelet-derived growth factor BB is reduced in endometrial endothelial cells of women with abnormal uterine bleeding-endometrial disorder," 2022, Reproductive BioMedicine Online
  • "Replication Data for: Malaria in pregnancy: adverse effects on haemoglobin levels and birthweight in primigravidae and multigravidae," 2021, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine

Judith N. Bulmer collaborated frequently with several researchers, including Barbara A. Innes, Gendie E. Lash, Qinsheng Lu, Dingqian Sun, and Sourima Biswas Shivhare. These collaborations contributed multiple coauthored publications in their fields of study.

Their work was published in various scientific venues, such as:

  • Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
  • Placenta
  • Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
  • Reproductive BioMedicine Online
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine

The primary fields of study of Judith N. Bulmer included medicine and immunology and microbiology, with their research spanning important subfields like obstetrics and gynecology, immunology, reproductive medicine, pediatrics, perinatology and child health, and cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

Best Publications

  • Single-cell reconstruction of the early maternal–fetal interface in humans

    Roser Vento-Tormo;Roser Vento-Tormo;Mirjana Efremova;Rachel A. Botting;Margherita Y. Turco

  • Granulated lymphocytes in human endometrium: histochemical and immunohistochemical studies

    Judith N. Bulmer;Lynn Morrison;Margaret Longfellow;Anne Ritson

  • Intermittent sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine to prevent severe anaemia secondary to malaria in pregnancy: a randomised placebo-controlled trial

    CE Shulman;CE Shulman;EK Dorman;EK Dorman;F Cutts;K Kawuondo

  • Spiral artery remodeling and trophoblast invasion in preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction: relationship to clinical outcome.

    Fiona Lyall;Stephen C. Robson;Judith N. Bulmer

  • Expression of angiogenic growth factors by uterine natural killer cells during early pregnancy

    Gendie E. Lash;Barbara Schiessl;Maureen Kirkley;Barbara A. Innes

  • Vitamin D and placental-decidual function.

    Katie N. Evans;Judith N. Bulmer;Judith N. Bulmer;Mark D. Kilby;Mark D. Kilby;Martin Hewison;Martin Hewison

  • Immune cells in the placental bed.

    Judith N. Bulmer;Paula J. Williams;Gendie E. Lash

  • Uterine natural killer cells initiate spiral artery remodeling in human pregnancy

    Andrew Robson;Lynda K. Harris;Barbara A. Innes;Gendie E. Lash

  • Variant surface antigen-specific IgG and protection against clinical consequences of pregnancy-associated Plasmodium falciparum malaria.

    Trine Staalsoe;Caroline E Shulman;Caroline E Shulman;Judith N Bulmer;Ken Kawuondo

  • Uterine natural killer cells and angiogenesis in recurrent reproductive failure

    Siobhan Quenby;Helena Nik;Barbara Innes;Gendie Lash

  • Human uterine natural killer cells: a reappraisal.

    Judith N. Bulmer;Gendie E. Lash

  • Effects of 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 and 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 on Cytokine Production by Human Decidual Cells

    Katie N. Evans;Lisa Nguyen;Junny Chan;Barbara A. Innes

  • Late sporadic miscarriage is associated with abnormalities in spiral artery transformation and trophoblast invasion

    E Ball;J. N. Bulmer;Salma Ayis;F Lyall

  • Review: Functional role of uterine natural killer (uNK) cells in human early pregnancy decidua.

    Gendie Lash;Stephen Robson;Judith Bulmer

  • Decidual leucocyte populations in early to late gestation normal human pregnancy.

    P.J. Williams;R.F. Searle;S.C. Robson;B.A. Innes

  • Oestrogen and progesterone receptor expression in the female lower urinary tract, with reference to oestrogen status

    P.J. Blakeman;P. Hilton;J.N. Bulmer

  • The Ontogeny of 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 1α-Hydroxylase Expression in Human Placenta and Decidua

    Daniel Zehnder;Katie N. Evans;Mark D. Kilby;Judith N. Bulmer

  • Human Trophoblast Invasion and Spiral Artery Transformation : The Role of PECAM-1 in Normal Pregnancy, Preeclampsia, and Fetal Growth Restriction

    Fiona Lyall;Judith Nicola Bulmer;Elizabeth Duffie;Frances Cousins

  • Malaria in pregnancy: adverse effects on haemoglobin levels and birthweight in primigravidae and multigravidae.

    C. E. Shulman;T. Marshall;E. K. Dorman;J. N. Bulmer

  • Inhibition of Trophoblast Cell Invasion by TGFB1, 2, and 3 Is Associated with a Decrease in Active Proteases

    Gendie E. Lash;Harry A. Otun;Barbara A. Innes;Judith N. Bulmer

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen C. Robson
Stephen C. Robson Newcastle University
Mark D. Kilby
Mark D. Kilby University of Birmingham
Kevin Marsh
Kevin Marsh University of Oxford
Richard J. Lilford
Richard J. Lilford University of Birmingham
Martin Hewison
Martin Hewison University of Birmingham
Jayne A. Franklyn
Jayne A. Franklyn University of Birmingham
Felicity Cutts
Felicity Cutts London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Ian D. Cooke
Ian D. Cooke University of Sheffield
Jim Todd
Jim Todd London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
John D. Aplin
John D. Aplin University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re exploring medical studies in the USA, a variety of related online degrees can prepare you for dynamic careers in healthcare. One valuable pathway is pursuing a degree in healthcare administration to build skills in leadership, policy, and organizational management—vital for future health executives and administrators.

Nursing professionals seeking career advancement may consider asn to fnp programs, which offer flexible online options for moving from an Associate Degree in Nursing to becoming a Family Nurse Practitioner.

For those interested in patient health and wellness, exploring the best online nutrition degree options can open doors to roles in clinical nutrition, research, and public health initiatives.

Accreditation is crucial when choosing a healthcare program. Students should prioritize which online healthcare degree programs are recognized for their accreditation by cahme? as this ensures quality education and future opportunities for career growth.

Best Scientists Citing Judith N. Bulmer

Recently Published Articles