World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 81 16547 15564 6 4 361 26481

Rose McGready publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rose McGready between 1994 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rose McGready published across 33 years, from 1994 to 2026, averaging 11.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 34 publications in 2012. 13 of the 387 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 34. Peak 34 publications in 2012. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 34 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 27 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 11 publications 2026: 2 publications
1994 2026

387 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rose McGready: publications per year, 1994 to 2026
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 1
1996 0
1997 0
1998 3
1999 7
2000 5
2001 7
2002 5
2003 9
2004 11
2005 7
2006 14
2007 10
2008 14
2009 13
2010 13
2011 12
2012 34
2013 10
2014 12
2015 19
2016 19
2017 27
2018 21
2019 14
2020 21
2021 22
2022 17
2023 11
2024 15
2025 11
2026 2
Total 387
Download as CSV

Rose McGready publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rose McGready sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 361–380 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 361 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838 361
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Rose McGready D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rose McGready sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972 81
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Distinguished International Fellow of the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (ASTMH)
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

Rose McGready is affiliated with Mahidol University in Thailand and has made substantial contributions to medical research with a focus on maternal and child health. Their primary field of study is Medicine, encompassing 197 publications, with concentrated expertise in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Epidemiology, and Clinical Psychology.

Their research covers a range of topics including:

  • Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Malaria Research and Control
  • Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Birth, Development, and Health
  • Neonatal Health and Biochemistry
  • Gestational Diabetes Research and Management

Rose McGready has published extensively, with frequent venues including Wellcome Open Research, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, PLoS ONE, BMC Medicine, and The Lancet. Notable recent papers include:

  • "Achieving accurate estimates of fetal gestational age and personalised predictions of fetal growth based on data from an international prospective cohort study: a population-based machine learning study," 2020, The Lancet Digital Health
  • "Vaginal Microbiota and Cytokine Levels Predict Preterm Delivery in Asian Women," 2021, Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
  • "The risk of Plasmodium vivax parasitaemia after P. falciparum malaria: An individual patient data meta-analysis from the WorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network," 2020, PLoS Medicine
  • "Deleterious effects of malaria in pregnancy on the developing fetus: a review on prevention and treatment with antimalarial drugs," 2020, The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health
  • "Association Between Preterm-Birth Phenotypes and Differential Morbidity, Growth, and Neurodevelopment at Age 2 Years," 2021, JAMA Pediatrics

The scientist frequently collaborates with colleagues including François Nosten, Mary Ellen Gilder, Verena I. Carrara, Aung Myat Min, and Tobias Brummaier. These collaborations have contributed to a broad spectrum of publications.

Among the accolades awarded to Rose McGready are the Distinguished International Fellow of the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (ASTMH) received in 2018 and fellowship in The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom.

Best Publications

  • Epidemiology and burden of malaria in pregnancy

    Meghna Desai;Feiko O ter Kuile;Feiko O ter Kuile;François Nosten;François Nosten;Rose McGready;Rose McGready

  • Emergence of artemisinin-resistant malaria on the western border of Thailand: a longitudinal study

    Aung Pyae Phyo;Standwell Nkhoma;Kasia Stepniewska;Kasia Stepniewska;Elizabeth A. Ashley;Elizabeth A. Ashley

  • Mefloquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum and increased pfmdr1 gene copy number.

    Ric N. Price;Ric N. Price;Anne Catrin Uhlemann;Alan Brockman;Rose McGready

  • US Immigration Westernizes the Human Gut Microbiome.

    Pajau Vangay;Abigail J. Johnson;Tonya L. Ward;Gabriel A. Al-Ghalith

  • Artemether-lumefantrine treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria: a systematic review and meta-analysis of day 7 lumefantrine concentrations and therapeutic response using individual patient data

    EA Ashley;F Aweeka;KI Barnes;Q Bassat

  • Effects of artesunate-mefloquine combination on incidence of Plasmodium falciparum malaria and mefloquine resistance in western Thailand: a prospective study

    F Nosten;F Nosten;M van Vugt;R Price;R Price;C Luxemburger;C Luxemburger

  • A Major Genome Region Underlying Artemisinin Resistance in Malaria

    Ian H. Cheeseman;Becky A. Miller;Shalini Nair;Standwell Nkhoma

  • Effects of Plasmodium vivax malaria in pregnancy

    F Nosten;F Nosten;R McGready;R McGready;JA Simpson;KL Thwai

  • The sick placenta: The role of malaria

    Bernard Brabin;Bernard Brabin;C. Romagosa;S. Abdelgalil;C. Menendez

  • Adverse effects in patients with acute falciparum malaria treated with artemisinin derivatives.

    R Price;M van Vugt;L Phaipun;C Luxemburger

  • Fake antimalarials in Southeast Asia are a major impediment to malaria control: multinational cross‐sectional survey on the prevalence of fake antimalarials

    A. M. Dondorp;P. N. Newton;P. N. Newton;M. Mayxay;W. Van Damme

  • International estimated fetal weight standards of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project

    J Stirnemann;J Villar;L J Salomon;E Ohuma;E Ohuma

  • Changes in the Treatment Responses to Artesunate-Mefloquine on the Northwestern Border of Thailand during 13 Years of Continuous Deployment

    Verena Ilona Carrara;Julien Zwang;Elizabeth A. Ashley;Elizabeth A. Ashley;Ric N. Price;Ric N. Price

  • Epidemiology and burden of malaria in pregnancy.

    Desai M;ter Kuile Fo;Nosten F;McGready R

  • Declining Efficacy of Artemisinin Combination Therapy Against P. Falciparum Malaria on the Thai–Myanmar Border (2003–2013): The Role of Parasite Genetic Factors

    Aung Pyae Phyo;Aung Pyae Phyo;Elizabeth A. Ashley;Elizabeth A. Ashley;Tim J C Anderson;Zbynek Bozdech

  • Characterization of Solid Counterfeit Drug Samples by Desorption Electrospray Ionization and Direct-analysis-in-real-time Coupled to Time-of-flight Mass Spectrometry

    Facundo M. Fernández;Robert B. Cody;Michael D. Green;Christina Y. Hampton

  • Central Role of the Spleen in Malaria Parasite Clearance

    Kesinee Chotivanich;Rachanee Udomsangpetch;Rose McGready;Stephane Proux

  • Manslaughter by Fake Artesunate in Asia—Will Africa Be Next?

    Paul N Newton;Rose McGready;Facundo Fernandez;Michael D Green

  • Safety of the insect repellent N,N-diethyl-M-toluamide (DEET) in pregnancy.

    Rose Mcgready;Katie A. Hamilton;Julie A. Simpson;Thein Cho

  • Effects of Malaria during Pregnancy on Infant Mortality in an Area of Low Malaria Transmission

    Christine Luxemburger;Rose McGready;Am Kham;Linda Morison

Frequent Co-Authors

François Nosten
François Nosten MORU Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit
Nicholas J. White
Nicholas J. White Mahidol University
Elizabeth A. Ashley
Elizabeth A. Ashley University of Oxford
Julie A. Simpson
Julie A. Simpson University of Melbourne
Pratap Singhasivanon
Pratap Singhasivanon Mahidol University
Kasia Stepniewska
Kasia Stepniewska University of Oxford
Nicholas P. J. Day
Nicholas P. J. Day University of Oxford
Freya J. I. Fowkes
Freya J. I. Fowkes Burnet Institute
Niklas Lindegardh
Niklas Lindegardh Mahidol University
Sornchai Looareesuwan
Sornchai Looareesuwan Mahidol University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

While pursuing Medicine in the USA is a rewarding journey, there are other healthcare pathways and online degree options to consider. For those interested in nursing but without a nursing background, direct entry msn programs online allow non-nurses to transition quickly into advanced practice roles.

Some prospective students look for programs that offer more accessible admission criteria. If you want to know what’s the easiest nursing program to get into?, many schools now offer flexible prerequisites and supportive learning environments.

Not interested in clinical roles? Consider health administration and support careers. There are top medical billing and coding schools that accept fafsa, making this field more financially accessible.

Finally, some nursing schools make the entry process easier by not requiring admissions exams. You may be wondering, do you have to take a teas test for lpn? Many schools now waive this requirement, broadening your options in nursing education.

Best Scientists Citing Rose McGready

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles