World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 93 10963 10298 345 338 393 29016

Julie A. Simpson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Julie A. Simpson between 1982 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Julie A. Simpson published across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025, averaging 11.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 2017. 55 of the 506 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 2017. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 23 publications 2015: 29 publications 2016: 24 publications 2017: 33 publications 2018: 22 publications 2019: 33 publications 2020: 28 publications 2021: 30 publications 2022: 25 publications 2023: 30 publications 2024: 30 publications 2025: 25 publications
1982 2025

506 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Julie A. Simpson: publications per year, 1982 to 2025
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 0
1984 1
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 4
1997 5
1998 6
1999 10
2000 10
2001 10
2002 12
2003 7
2004 0
2005 4
2006 10
2007 10
2008 15
2009 14
2010 8
2011 8
2012 15
2013 23
2014 23
2015 29
2016 24
2017 33
2018 22
2019 33
2020 28
2021 30
2022 25
2023 30
2024 30
2025 25
Total 506
Download as CSV

Julie A. Simpson publications per year - data summary

  • Julie A. Simpson, a Medicine scholar from University of Melbourne, has 506 publications recorded across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1982 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive years are 2017 and 2019, with 33 publications each.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1982, 1984 and 1993, with 1 publication each.
  • 12 of the 44 years in the span carry no publications at all (1983, 1985, 1986, 1987 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 11.5 papers per year over the whole span, or 15.8 per year counting only the 32 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 140 publications, 28% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1982-1996: 7 publications (0.5 per year); 1997-2011: 129 publications (8.6 per year); 2012-2025: 370 publications (26.4 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Julie A. Simpson publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julie A. Simpson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 381–400 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 393 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861 393
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Julie A. Simpson publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Julie A. Simpson, a Medicine scholar from University of Melbourne, records 393 publications - the 37th percentile of the discipline.
  • 37% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Julie A. Simpson, and about 63% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Julie A. Simpson ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Julie A. Simpson D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julie A. Simpson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 92–93 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839 93
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Julie A. Simpson D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Julie A. Simpson, a Medicine scholar from University of Melbourne, records 93 D-Index - the 47th percentile of the discipline.
  • 47% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Julie A. Simpson, and about 53% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Julie A. Simpson ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Julie A. Simpson is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a strong focus on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Statistics and Probability, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Genetics, and Pharmacology.

The researcher's work addresses several main topics, including:

  • Malaria Research and Control
  • Mosquito-borne diseases and control
  • Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
  • Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
  • Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Child Nutrition and Water Access

Julie A. Simpson has contributed to numerous publication venues, frequently publishing in:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • International Journal of Epidemiology
  • BMC Medicine
  • Malaria Journal
  • BMC Medical Research Methodology

Their recent papers include:

  • Estimating the Proportion of Plasmodium vivax Recurrences Caused by Relapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, 2020, American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
  • Identifying and combating the impacts of COVID-19 on malaria, 2020, BMC Medicine
  • Pregnancy-specific malarial immunity and risk of malaria in pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review, 2020, BMC Medicine
  • Multiple imputation methods for handling incomplete longitudinal and clustered data where the target analysis is a linear mixed effects model, 2020, Biometrical Journal
  • The risk of morbidity and mortality following recurrent malaria in Papua, Indonesia: a retrospective cohort study, 2020, BMC Medicine

The researcher collaborates frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Ric N. Price
  • Nicholas J. White
  • David J. Price
  • Freya J. I. Fowkes
  • S Dini

Best Publications

  • Annual high-dose oral vitamin D and falls and fractures in older women: a randomized controlled trial

    Kerrie M. Sanders;Amanda L. Stuart;Elizabeth J. Williamson;Julie A. Simpson

  • The impact of chronic urticaria on the quality of life

    B.F. O'Donnell;F. Lawlor;Julie Simpson;Myfanwy Morgan

  • Acute Management of Dengue Shock Syndrome: A Randomized Double-Blind Comparison of 4 Intravenous Fluid Regimens in the First Hour

    Ngo Thi Nhan;Cao Xuan Thanh Phuong;Rachel Kneen;Rachel Kneen;Bridget Wills;Bridget Wills

  • Factors contributing to anemia after uncomplicated falciparum malaria

    R N Price;J A Simpson;F Nosten;C Luxemburger

  • A quantitative analysis of the microvascular sequestration of malaria parasites in the human brain.

    Kamolrat Silamut;Nguyen H. Phu;Christopher Whitty;Gareth D.H. Turner

  • Statistical approaches for assessing the relative validity of a food-frequency questionnaire: use of correlation coefficients and the kappa statistic

    Lindsey Fiona Masson;Geraldine McNeill;J. O. Tomany;J. A. Simpson

  • Effects of Plasmodium vivax malaria in pregnancy

    F Nosten;F Nosten;R McGready;R McGready;JA Simpson;KL Thwai

  • The rise of multiple imputation: a review of the reporting and implementation of the method in medical research

    Panteha Hayati Rezvan;Katherine J Lee;Katherine J Lee;Julie A Simpson

  • The Relationship between Anti-merozoite Antibodies and Incidence of Plasmodium falciparum Malaria: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Freya J. I. Fowkes;Jack S. Richards;Jack S. Richards;Julie A. Simpson;James G. Beeson

  • INCREASED RATE OF LUPUS FLARE DURING PREGNANCY AND THE PUERPERIUM: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF 78 PREGNANCIES

    G. Ruiz-Irastorza;F. Lima;J. Alves;M. A. Khamashta

  • Improving the radical cure of vivax malaria (IMPROV): a study protocol for a multicentre randomised, placebo-controlled comparison of short and long course primaquine regimens

    T Abreha;B Alemayehu;A Assefa;GR Awab

  • TARGETING THE CELL STRESS RESPONSE OF PLASMODIUM FALCIPARUM TO OVERCOME ARTEMISININ RESISTANCE

    Con Dogovski;Stanley C. Xie;Gaetan Burgio;Jess Bridgford

  • Impact of Tobacco Control Policies and Mass Media Campaigns on Monthly Adult Smoking Prevalence

    Melanie A. Wakefield;Sarah Durkin;Matthew J. Spittal;Mohammad Siahpush

  • Interpretation of measured red cell mass and plasma volume in adults: Expert Panel on Radionuclides of the International Council for Standardization in Haematology.

    T. C. Pearson;D. L. Guthrie;J. Simpson;S. Chinn

  • Dietary omega-3 fatty acid and fish intake in the primary prevention of age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Elaine W-T Chong;Andréas Josef Kreis;Tien Y Wong;Julie A Simpson

  • Adverse effects in patients with acute falciparum malaria treated with artemisinin derivatives.

    R Price;M van Vugt;L Phaipun;C Luxemburger

  • The prevalence of ear, nose and throat problems in the community: results from a national cross-sectional postal survey in Scotland

    Philip C Hannaford;Julie A Simpson;Ann Fiona Bisset;Adrian Davis

  • Secondary prevention clinics for coronary heart disease: four year follow up of a randomised controlled trial in primary care

    Peter Murchie;Neil Crawford Campbell;Lewis Duthie Ritchie;J. A. Simpson

  • Dermatology quality of life scales--a measure of the impact of skin diseases.

    Myfanwy Morgan;Rose McCreedy;Julie Simpson;Roderick J Hay

  • The automated manufacturing research facility of the national bureau of standards

    J.A. Simpson;R.J. Hocken;J.S. Albus

Frequent Co-Authors

Nicholas J. White
Nicholas J. White Mahidol University
Ric N. Price
Ric N. Price Charles Darwin University
Dallas R. English
Dallas R. English University of Melbourne
François Nosten
François Nosten MORU Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit
Freya J. I. Fowkes
Freya J. I. Fowkes Burnet Institute
Rose McGready
Rose McGready Mahidol University
Graham G. Giles
Graham G. Giles University of Melbourne
James G. Beeson
James G. Beeson Burnet Institute
Robyn H. Guymer
Robyn H. Guymer University of Melbourne
James M. McCaw
James M. McCaw University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in medicine doesn't always mean following the traditional MD route. There are many online degrees that offer diverse healthcare career opportunities. For example, earning a healthcare administration degree online accredited can open doors to leadership roles in hospitals, clinics, and public health organizations.

Nurses aiming to advance their skills often explore specialized bridge programs. ADN to FNP programs let registered nurses become family nurse practitioners, a rapidly growing role supporting primary healthcare access.

Nutrition is another vital area of healthcare. Pursuing an online bachelor's in nutrition provides foundational knowledge for clinical, community, or wellness careers.

Accreditation ensures quality and industry recognition. Prospective healthcare administrators should consider which online healthcare administration programs have CAHME accreditation? This can impact both educational experience and career potential.

Exploring these options can help you find the right fit and maximize your future impact in the healthcare industry.

Best Scientists Citing Julie A. Simpson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles