World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
44
Citations
9256
World Ranking
7512
National Ranking
3267

Sean Luke publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sean Luke sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 116 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Sean Luke D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sean Luke sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sean Luke is affiliated with George Mason University in the United States. Their research spans a range of academic disciplines, primarily focusing on Arts and Humanities as well as Computer Science. Within these broader areas, their work is notably concentrated on Philosophy, Artificial Intelligence, Mechanical Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, and History and Philosophy of Science.

The key topics addressed by their research include Theology and Philosophy of Evil, Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence, Medieval Philosophy and Theology, Reinforcement Learning in Robotics, Robotic Path Planning Algorithms, Karl Barth and Christian Theology, and Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems.

Sean Luke has published papers in various venues, with frequent appearances in the Journal of Reformed Theology and Religions. Other publication outlets include arXiv (Cornell University), Scottish Journal of Theology, and Perichoresis.

  • Simulate Less, Expect More: Bringing Robot Swarms to Life via Low-Fidelity Simulations (2023, arXiv (Cornell University))
  • Beatific embodiment: An Augustinian appraisal of our end-time embodiment (2022, Scottish Journal of Theology)
  • Not a Bare Permission (2023, Journal of Reformed Theology)
  • Beatific Satisfaction (2023, Perichoresis)
  • Molinist Thomist Calvinism: A Synthesis (2023, The Heythrop Journal)

Sean Luke collaborates frequently with other researchers, especially Michael Schader, with whom they have coauthored multiple papers. Other coauthors include Matteo D'Auria, Eric O. Scott, Rajdeep Singh Lather, and Javier Hilty.

  • Michael Schader
  • Matteo D'Auria
  • Eric O. Scott
  • Rajdeep Singh Lather
  • Javier Hilty

Best Publications

  • Cooperative Multi-Agent Learning: The State of the Art

    Liviu Panait;Sean Luke

  • MASON: A Multiagent Simulation Environment

    Sean Luke;Claudio Cioffi-Revilla;Liviu Panait;Keith Sullivan

  • MASON: A New Multi-Agent Simulation Toolkit

    Sean Luke;Claudio Cioffi-Revilla;Liviu Panait;Keith Sullivan

  • Ontology-based Web agents

    Sean Luke;Lee Spector;David Rager;James Hendler

  • SHOE: A Knowledge Representation Language for Internet Applications

    Jeff Heflin;James Hendler;Sean Luke

  • Genetic programming needs better benchmarks

    James McDermott;David R. White;Sean Luke;Luca Manzoni

  • A comparison of bloat control methods for genetic programming

    Sean Luke;Liviu Panait

  • Lexicographic parsimony pressure

    Sean Luke;Liviu Panait

  • Evolving teamwork and coordination with genetic programming

    Sean Luke;Lee Spector

  • Better GP benchmarks: community survey results and proposals

    David R. White;James Mcdermott;Mauro Castelli;Luca Manzoni

  • Co-evolving Soccer Softbot Team Coordination with Genetic Programming

    Sean Luke;Charles Hohn;Jonathan Farris;Gary Jackson

  • Two fast tree-creation algorithms for genetic programming

    S. Luke

  • A Comparison of Crossover and Mutation in Genetic Programming

    Sean Luke;Lee Spector

  • A Pheromone-Based Utility Model for Collaborative Foraging

    Liviu Panait;Sean Luke

  • Ontology-Based Knowledge Discovery on the World-Wide Web

    Sean Luke;Lee Spector;David Rager

  • Fighting Bloat with Nonparametric Parsimony Pressure

    Sean Luke;Liviu Panait

  • An overview of cooperative and competitive multiagent learning

    Pieter Jan 't Hoen;Karl Tuyls;Liviu Panait;Sean Luke

  • Theoretical Advantages of Lenient Learners: An Evolutionary Game Theoretic Perspective

    Liviu Panait;Karl Tuyls;Sean Luke

  • Biasing Coevolutionary Search for Optimal Multiagent Behaviors

    L. Panait;S. Luke;R.P. Wiegand

  • Reading Between the Lines: Using SHOE to Discover Implicit Knowledge from the Web

    Jeff Heflin;James Hendler;Sean Luke

  • Improving coevolutionary search for optimal multiagent behaviors

    Liviu Panait;R. Paul Wiegand;Sean Luke

Frequent Co-Authors

James A. Hendler
James A. Hendler Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Lee Spector
Lee Spector Hampshire College
Karl Tuyls
Karl Tuyls DeepMind (United Kingdom)
Luis Almeida
Luis Almeida University of Porto
Andrew Crooks
Andrew Crooks University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Eric Saund
Eric Saund IEEE-USA
Carlotta Domeniconi
Carlotta Domeniconi George Mason University
James A. Landay
James A. Landay Stanford University
Julian Togelius
Julian Togelius New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science doesn’t stop at traditional bachelor’s degrees. Prospective students can consider associates degrees online, which provide foundational knowledge and can lead directly into entry-level tech roles or further study.

For those concerned about costs, there are many affordable online degree programs that make earning a qualification more accessible. These programs allow you to pursue your passion in Computer Science without overwhelming financial strain.

If your academic background isn’t perfect, don’t worry—several online colleges that accept 2.0 gpa provide opportunities for students looking for a second chance to succeed in their studies and future careers.

Additionally, the skills gained in Computer Science can open doors to a variety of sectors. Curious about other career options with related degrees? Learn about what jobs can you get with an environmental science degree to explore interdisciplinary paths that blend technology with real-world impact.

Whether you're just starting out or seeking flexible, affordable routes, online education offers diverse pathways into a rewarding tech career.

Best Scientists Citing Sean Luke

Trending Scientists