World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Una-May O'Reilly

Una-May O'Reilly

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
42
Citations
7694
World Ranking
8359
National Ranking
3584

Una-May O'Reilly publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Una-May O'Reilly sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 283 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Una-May O'Reilly D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Una-May O'Reilly sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Una-May O'Reilly is affiliated with MIT in the United States and is an active researcher in the field of computer science. Their work spans multiple subfields including artificial intelligence, information systems, computer vision and pattern recognition, signal processing, and computer networks and communications.

Their research focuses on several main topics such as evolutionary algorithms and applications, generative adversarial networks and image synthesis, reinforcement learning in robotics, advanced malware detection techniques, network security and intrusion detection, software engineering research, and metaheuristic optimization algorithms research.

Una-May O'Reilly has contributed extensively to research literature, with notable recent publications including:

  • Comprehension of computer code relies primarily on domain-general executive brain regions, 2020, eLife
  • Spatial Coevolution for Generative Adversarial Network Training, 2021, ACM Transactions on Evolutionary Learning and Optimization
  • Evolving code with a large language model, 2024, Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines
  • Linking Threat Tactics, Techniques, and Patterns with Defensive Weaknesses, Vulnerabilities and Affected Platform Configurations for Cyber Hunting, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Evaluating efficacy of indoor non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19 outbreaks with a coupled spatial-SIR agent-based simulation framework, 2022, Scientific Reports

Their collaborations include frequent co-authorship with the following researchers:

  • Erik Hemberg
  • Jamal Toutouh
  • Shashank Srikant
  • Stephen Moskal

They have published prominently in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), the Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion, the Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, ACM Transactions on Evolutionary Learning and Optimization, and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory).

Una-May O'Reilly has also contributed to book publications, including a work titled Search-Based Software Engineering published by Springer Science+Business Media in 2021.

Best Publications

  • OpenTuner: an extensible framework for program autotuning

    Jason Ansel;Shoaib Kamil;Kalyan Veeramachaneni;Jonathan Ragan-Kelley

  • Genetic and Evolutionary Computation -- GECCO-2003

    Erick Cantú-Paz;James A. Foster;Kalyanmoy Deb;Lawrence David Davis

  • Meta optimization: improving compiler heuristics with machine learning

    Mark Stephenson;Saman Amarasinghe;Martin Martin;Una-May O'Reilly

  • Genetic programming needs better benchmarks

    James McDermott;David R. White;Sean Luke;Luca Manzoni

  • Better GP benchmarks: community survey results and proposals

    David R. White;James Mcdermott;Mauro Castelli;Luca Manzoni

  • The Troubling Aspects of a Building Block Hypothesis for Genetic Programming

    Una-May O'Reilly;Franz Oppacher

  • Adversarial Deep Learning for Robust Detection of Binary Encoded Malware

    Abdullah Al-Dujaili;Alex Huang;Erik Hemberg;Una-May OReilly

  • Likely to stop? Predicting Stopout in Massive Open Online Courses

    Colin Taylor;Kalyan Veeramachaneni;Una-May O'Reilly

  • An analysis of genetic programming

    Franz Oppacher;Una-May O'Reilly

  • Evolutionary Approaches To Minimizing Network Coding Resources

    Minkyu Kim;M. Medard;V. Aggarwal;U.-M. O'Reilly

  • Program Search with a Hierarchical Variable Lenght Representation: Genetic Programming, Simulated Annealing and Hill Climbing

    Una-May O'Reilly;Franz Oppacher

  • Multiple regression genetic programming

    Ignacio Arnaldo;Krzysztof Krawiec;Una-May O'Reilly

  • SENSING AND MANIPULATING BUILT-FOR-HUMAN ENVIRONMENTS

    Rodney A. Brooks;Lijin Aryananda;Aaron Edsinger;Paul M. Fitzpatrick

  • Autotuning algorithmic choice for input sensitivity

    Yufei Ding;Jason Ansel;Kalyan Veeramachaneni;Xipeng Shen

  • Using a distance metric on genetic programs to understand genetic operators

    U.-M. O'Reilly

  • Comprehension of computer code relies primarily on domain-general executive brain regions.

    Anna A Ivanova;Anna A Ivanova;Shashank Srikant;Yotaro Sueoka;Yotaro Sueoka;Hope H Kean;Hope H Kean

  • Building Predictive Models via Feature Synthesis

    Ignacio Arnaldo;Una-May O'Reilly;Kalyan Veeramachaneni

  • Using reinforcement learning to optimize occupant comfort and energy usage in HVAC systems

    Pedro Fazenda;Kalyan Veeramachaneni;Pedro Lima;Una-May O'Reilly

  • Hybridized crossover-based search techniques for program discovery

    U.-M. O'Reilly;F. Oppacher

  • Distributed, multi-model, self-learning platform for machine learning

    Will D. Drevo;Kalyan K. Veeramachaneni;Una-May O'Reilly

  • Proceedings of the 7th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation

    Hans-Georg Beyer;Una-May O'Reilly

Frequent Co-Authors

Frank Neumann
Frank Neumann University of Adelaide
Nancy Law
Nancy Law University of Hong Kong
Marina Umaschi Bers
Marina Umaschi Bers Tufts University
Nicola Santoro
Nicola Santoro Carleton University
David E. Goldberg
David E. Goldberg University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
William B. Langdon
William B. Langdon University College London
Sijia Liu
Sijia Liu Michigan State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science education in the USA opens doors to many degree options and career paths. For those planning their academic journey, it’s important to start with the right foundation—considering the college majors that align with your interests and aspirations.

If you want to upskill efficiently, you may wonder what is the easiest masters degree to pursue online. Several programs offer flexible learning and relatively straightforward coursework, making it easier to balance further study with work or personal commitments.

Affordability is another crucial factor. Students seeking an advanced qualification should research the cheapest online doctoral programs, which allow you to earn a respected degree while minimizing student debt. There are also opportunities for fast advancement through online edd programs that offer accelerated pathways to leadership roles.

By understanding these related degrees and career pathways, you can make informed choices that fit your goals, budget, and timeline in the dynamic field of computer science.

Best Scientists Citing Una-May O'Reilly

Trending Scientists