World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
USA
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
115
Citations
301272
World Ranking
182
National Ranking
106

David E. Goldberg publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David E. Goldberg sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 487 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

David E. Goldberg D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David E. Goldberg sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 115 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in United States Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in United States Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in United States Leader Award
  • 2010 - Evolutionary Computation Pioneer Award, IEEE Computational Intelligence Society

Overview

David E. Goldberg is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields of study, focusing primarily on Psychology and Neuroscience, with specific attention to Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, and General Psychology.

The main topics covered in their work include Educational and Psychological Assessments, Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function, and Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology.

Their recent publication includes the paper titled Remembering Jeffrey Horn (1963-2024), published in 2024 in ACM SIGEVOlution.

  • Nina Jirouskova
  • Kalyanmoy Deb
  • William B. Langdon

  • ACM SIGEVOlution

David E. Goldberg has authored books published by Fordham University Press eBooks, including The Retreats of Reconstruction, released in 2020.

In 2010, they were recognized with the Evolutionary Computation Pioneer Award from the IEEE Computational Intelligence Society.

Best Publications

  • Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning

    David E. Goldberg

  • Genetic Algorithms

    D E Goldberg;William Shakespeare

  • Genetic Algorithms in Search

    D. E. Goldberg

  • Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestry

    David Goldberg;David Nichols;Brian M. Oki;Douglas Terry

  • Genetic Algorithms and Machine Learning

    David E. Goldberg;John H. Holland

  • A niched Pareto genetic algorithm for multiobjective optimization

    J. Horn;N. Nafpliotis;D.E. Goldberg

  • A Comparative Analysis of Selection Schemes Used in Genetic Algorithms

    David E. Goldberg;Kalyanmoy Deb

  • Genetic algorithms with sharing for multimodal function optimization

    David E. Goldberg;Jon Richardson

  • What every computer scientist should know about floating-point arithmetic

    David Goldberg

  • Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization & Machine Learning

    D. E. Goldberg

  • Alleles, loci and the traveling salesman problem

    D. E. Goldberg

  • A Survey of Optimization by Building and Using Probabilistic Models

    Martin Pelikan;David E. Goldberg;Fernando G. Lobo

  • Messy genetic algorithms: motivation, analysis, and first results

    David E. Goldberg;Bradley Korb;Kalyanmoy Deb

  • The compact genetic algorithm

    G.R. Harik;F.G. Lobo;D.E. Goldberg

  • The Design of Innovation: Lessons from and for Competent Genetic Algorithms

    David E. Goldberg

  • Classifier systems and genetic algorithms

    L. B. Booker;D. E. Goldberg;J. H. Holland

  • Genetic Algorithms, Tournament Selection, and the Effects of Noise.

    Brad L. Miller;David E. Goldberg

  • An Investigation of Niche and Species Formation in Genetic Function Optimization

    Kalyanmoy Deb;David E. Goldberg

  • BOA: the Bayesian optimization algorithm

    Martin Pelikan;David E. Goldberg;Erick Cantú-Paz

  • Genetic Algorithm in Search

    D. E. Goldberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Kumara Sastry
Kumara Sastry University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Martin Pelikan
Martin Pelikan University of Missouri
Martin V. Butz
Martin V. Butz University of Tübingen
Pier Luca Lanzi
Pier Luca Lanzi Polytechnic University of Milan
Kalyanmoy Deb
Kalyanmoy Deb Michigan State University
Barbara S. Minsker
Barbara S. Minsker Southern Methodist University
Erick Cantú-Paz
Erick Cantú-Paz Amazon (United States)
Stewart W. Wilson
Stewart W. Wilson University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Duane D. Johnson
Duane D. Johnson Iowa State University
Patrick M. Reed
Patrick M. Reed Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and emerging career pathways. Many students are exploring fields such as criminal justice, accounting, data science, and construction management to broaden their skills and career prospects.

For those interested in justice and law, understanding the cost of criminal justice degree can help you plan your studies and budget effectively. Similarly, future financial experts can compare programs using the cheapest accredited online accounting degree to balance affordability and accreditation.

Aspiring data scientists should explore the cheapest masters in data science programs that blend advanced skills with cost-efficiency. For those drawn to project management and the building industry, the fastest online construction management degree can significantly shorten your time to graduation.

Whether you seek flexibility, affordability, or a fast track to a rewarding career, researching these online degrees can support your professional journey after studying Computer Science in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing David E. Goldberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles