World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
40
Citations
7790
World Ranking
7226
National Ranking
1976

Andrew Crooks publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew Crooks sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 147 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Andrew Crooks D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew Crooks sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrew Crooks is affiliated with the University at Buffalo, State University of New York, in the United States. Their research primarily resides within the Social Sciences, with notable contributions across several interrelated subfields, including Transportation, Sociology and Political Science, Global and Planetary Change, Building and Construction, and Modeling and Simulation.

Their work addresses diverse topics, with particular emphasis on Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis, Land Use and Ecosystem Services, COVID-19 epidemiological studies, Geographic Information Systems Studies, Urban Design and Spatial Analysis, Misinformation and Its Impacts, and Data-Driven Disease Surveillance.

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Andrew Crooks include:

  • Future Developments in Geographical Agent-Based Models: Challenges and Opportunities, 2020, Geographical Analysis
  • Insights into human-wildlife interactions in cities from bird sightings recorded online, 2020, Landscape and Urban Planning
  • Crowdsourcing Street View Imagery: A Comparison of Mapillary and OpenStreetCam, 2020, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
  • Unraveling the complexity of human behavior and urbanization on community vulnerability to floods, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • Shaping urbanization to achieve communities resilient to floods, 2021, Environmental Research Letters

Andrew Crooks has collaborated frequently with a range of researchers, including Na Jiang, Hamdi Kavak, Arie Croitoru, Qingqing Chen, and Andreas Züfle. These collaborations reflect a sustained engagement with co-authors contributing to multiple publications together.

Their publications have appeared predominantly in the following venues:

  • Environment and Planning B Urban Analytics and City Science
  • ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
  • Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory
  • SIGSPATIAL Special
  • Computers Environment and Urban Systems

Best Publications

  • #Earthquake: Twitter as a Distributed Sensor System

    Andrew Crooks;Arie Croitoru;Anthony Stefanidis;Jacek Radzikowski

  • Key challenges in agent-based modelling for geo-spatial simulation

    Andrew Crooks;Christian Castle;Michael Batty

  • Harvesting ambient geospatial information from social media feeds

    Anthony Stefanidis;Andrew Crooks;Jacek Radzikowski

  • Agent-based Models of Geographical Systems

    Alison J. Heppenstall;Andrew T. Crooks;Linda M. See;Michael Batty

  • Introduction to Agent-Based Modelling

    Andrew T. Crooks;Alison J. Heppenstall

  • Principles and Concepts of Agent-Based Modelling for Developing Geospatial Simulations

    Cje Castle;AT Crooks

  • Crowdsourcing urban form and function

    Andrew Crooks;Dieter Pfoser;Andrew Jenkins;Arie Croitoru

  • Map mashups, Web 2.0 and the GIS revolution

    Michael Batty;Andrew Hudson-Smith;Richard Milton;Andrew Crooks

  • A Critical Review of High and Very High-Resolution Remote Sensing Approaches for Detecting and Mapping Slums: Trends, Challenges and Emerging Opportunities

    Ron Mahabir;Arie Croitoru;Andrew T. Crooks;Peggy Agouris

  • Random planar graphs and the London street network

    A. P. Masucci;D. Smith;A. Crooks;M. Batty

  • Mapping for the Masses

    Andrew Hudson-Smith;Michael Batty;Andrew Crooks;Richard Milton

  • The Integration of Agent-Based Modelling and Geographical Information for Geospatial Simulation

    Andrew T. Crooks;Christian J. E. Castle

  • The Measles Vaccination Narrative in Twitter: A Quantitative Analysis.

    Jacek Radzikowski;Anthony Stefanidis;Kathryn H Jacobsen;Arie Croitoru

  • NeoGeography and Web 2.0: concepts, tools and applications

    Andrew Hudson-Smith;Andrew Crooks;Maurizio Gibin;Richard Milton

  • An agent-based modeling approach applied to the spread of cholera

    Andrew T. Crooks;Atesmachew B. Hailegiorgis

  • GIS and agent-based models for humanitarian assistance

    Andrew T. Crooks;Sarah Wise

  • Assessing Completeness and Spatial Error of Features in Volunteered Geographic Information

    Steven P. Jackson;William Mullen;Peggy Agouris;Andrew Crooks

  • Utilizing Python for Agent-Based Modeling: The Mesa Framework

    Jackie Kazil;David Masad;Andrew Crooks

  • Constructing and implementing an agent-based model of residential segregation through vector GIS

    A. T. Crooks

  • Crowdsourcing a Collective Sense of Place.

    Andrew Jenkins;Arie Croitoru;Andrew T. Crooks;Anthony Stefanidis

  • Geosocial gauge: a system prototype for knowledge discovery from social media

    Arie Croitoru;Andrew Crooks;Jacek Radzikowski;Anthony Stefanidis

  • Examining Emergent Communities and Social Bots Within the Polarized Online Vaccination Debate in Twitter

    Xiaoyi Yuan;Ross J. Schuchard;Andrew T. Crooks

  • The Renaissance of Geographic Information: Neogeography, Gaming and Second Life

    A Hudson-Smith;A Crooks

  • Demarcating new boundaries: mapping virtual polycentric communities through social media content

    Anthony Stefanidis;Amy Cotnoir;Arie Croitoru;Andrew Crooks

  • Future Developments in Geographical Agent‐Based Models: Challenges and Opportunities

    Alison Heppenstall;Andrew Crooks;Nick Malleson;Nick Malleson;Ed Manley;Ed Manley

  • Exploring Cities Using Agent Based Models and GIS

    AT Crooks

  • Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media Data for Socio-Environmental Systems Research

    Bianca E. Lopez;Nicholas R. Magliocca;Andrew T. Crooks

  • Modeling the emergence of riots: A geosimulation approach

    Bianica Pires;Bianica Pires;Andrew T. Crooks;Andrew T. Crooks

  • Location-Based Social Network Data Generation Based on Patterns of Life

    Joon-Seok Kim;Hyunjee Jin;Hamdi Kavak;Ovi Chris Rouly

  • Perspectives on Agent-Based Models and Geographical Systems

    Michael Batty;Andrew T. Crooks;Linda M. See;Alison J. Heppenstall

  • Data Mash-ups and the Future of Mapping

    R Milton;S Anand;M Batty;A Crooks

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Batty
Michael Batty University College London
Dieter Pfoser
Dieter Pfoser George Mason University
Linda See
Linda See International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
Emily K. Vraga
Emily K. Vraga University of Minnesota
Bruce R. Ellingwood
Bruce R. Ellingwood Colorado State University
Paul A. Longley
Paul A. Longley University College London
Sean Luke
Sean Luke George Mason University
Jhumka Gupta
Jhumka Gupta George Mason University
Daniel R. Montello
Daniel R. Montello University of California, Santa Barbara
Jean-Paul Rodrigue
Jean-Paul Rodrigue Texas A&M University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online education is transforming how students pursue Engineering and Technology careers in the USA. Flexible programs now allow learners to balance studies with work and family responsibilities. For those seeking a fast-track credential, 6 month master's degree online options make it possible to earn an advanced degree much more quickly than traditional paths.

Not everyone needs a full degree to launch or level up their career. There are now many high paying certificate jobs available after completing concise, targeted training. Some of these jobs only require short-term study, such as 6 week certificate programs online, allowing students to gain valuable skills and credentials in less than two months.

Flexibility is especially valuable for busy parents. Programs like online school for moms offer supportive learning environments and adaptable schedules. Whether you're seeking a degree or a certificate, the range of online options covers both traditional students and working professionals looking for advancement.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew Crooks

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles