World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
66
Citations
39587
World Ranking
1362
National Ranking
20

Marc Barthelemy publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc Barthelemy sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 204 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Marc Barthelemy D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc Barthelemy sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marc Barthelemy is a researcher affiliated with L'Institut de physique théorique in France specializing in interdisciplinary studies bridging social sciences and physics. Their work primarily addresses urban systems, human mobility, and spatial economic dynamics.

The scientist has contributed notably to the field of social sciences, with a significant focus on transportation, economics and econometrics, and statistical and nonlinear physics. Their research also encompasses building and construction as well as global and planetary change.

The range of main topics covered by Barthelemy's publications includes:

  • Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
  • Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
  • Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services

Barthelemy has published extensively in well-regarded venues, with a concentration in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Physical Review E
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Nature Cities
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Recent publications highlight various aspects of urban science and city population dynamics. These include:

  • The growth equation of cities (2020, Nature)
  • The role of complexity for digital twins of cities (2023, Nature Computational Science)
  • Spatial structure of city population growth (2022, Nature Communications)
  • Urban Science: Integrated Theory from the First Cities to Sustainable Metropolises (2020, SSRN Electronic Journal)
  • Defining a city - delineating urban areas using cell-phone data (2024, Nature Cities)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Barthelemy include Vincent Verbavatz, Erwan Taillanter, Olivier Thomine, Samuel Alizon, and Mircea T. Sofonea, each having multiple joint publications.

Best Publications

  • The architecture of complex weighted networks

    Alain Barrat;Marc Barthelemy;Romualdo Pastor-Satorras;Alessandro Vespignani

  • Classes of small-world networks

    L. A. N. Amaral;A. Scala;M. Barthélémy;H. E. Stanley

  • Multilayer Networks

    Mikko Kivelä;Alexandre Arenas;Marc Barthelemy;James P. Gleeson

  • Resolution limit in community detection

    Santo Fortunato;Marc Barthélemy

  • Spatial Networks

    Marc Barthelemy

  • The Architecture of Complex Weighted Networks: Measurements and Models

    Alain Barrat;Marc Barthélemy;Alessandro Vespignani

  • The role of the airline transportation network in the prediction and predictability of global epidemics

    Vittoria Colizza;Alain Barrat;Marc Barthélemy;Alessandro Vespignani

  • Human mobility: Models and applications

    Hugo Barbosa;Marc Barthelemy;Gourab Ghoshal;Charlotte R. James

  • Weighted Evolving Networks: Coupling Topology and Weight Dynamics

    Alain Barrat;Marc Barthélemy;Alessandro Vespignani

  • Velocity and Hierarchical Spread of Epidemic Outbreaks in Scale-Free Networks

    Marc Barthélemy;Alain Barrat;Romualdo Pastor-Satorras;Alessandro Vespignani

  • Betweenness centrality in large complex networks

    M. Barthélemy

  • Dynamical patterns of epidemic outbreaks in complex heterogeneous networks.

    Marc Barthélemy;Alain Barrat;Romualdo Pastor-Satorras;Alessandro Vespignani;Alessandro Vespignani

  • From mobile phone data to the spatial structure of cities

    Thomas Louail;Maxime Lenormand;Oliva G. Cantu Ros;Miguel Picornell

  • Structure of Urban Movements: Polycentric Activity and Entangled Hierarchical Flows

    Camille Roth;Soong Moon Kang;Michael Batty;Marc Barthélemy;Marc Barthélemy

  • Characterization and modeling of weighted networks

    Marc Barthélemy;Alain Barrat;Romualdo Pastor-Satorras;Alessandro Vespignani

  • Modeling the evolution of weighted networks.

    Alain Barrat;Marc Barthélemy;Alessandro Vespignani;Alessandro Vespignani

  • Small-World Networks: Evidence for a Crossover Picture

    Marc Barthélémy;Luís A. Nunes Amaral

  • The Structure of Interurban Traffic: A Weighted Network Analysis:

    Andrea De Montis;Marc Barthélemy;Alessandro Chessa;Alessandro Vespignani

  • Elementary processes governing the evolution of road networks

    Emanuele Strano;Vincenzo Nicosia;Vito Latora;Sergio Porta

  • Modeling Urban Street Patterns

    Marc Barthélemy;Alessandro Flammini

  • Growing Multiplex Networks

    Vincenzo Nicosia;Ginestra Bianconi;Vito Latora;Vito Latora;Marc Barthelemy

  • Resolution limit in community detection

    Marc Barthelemy;Santo Fortunato

Frequent Co-Authors

Alessandro Vespignani
Alessandro Vespignani Northeastern University
Alain Barrat
Alain Barrat Centre de Physique Théorique
José J. Ramasco
José J. Ramasco Spanish National Research Council
Enrique Frias-Martinez
Enrique Frias-Martinez Telefónica (Spain)
Romualdo Pastor-Satorras
Romualdo Pastor-Satorras Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya
Vito Latora
Vito Latora Queen Mary University of London
Michael Batty
Michael Batty University College London
Shlomo Havlin
Shlomo Havlin Bar-Ilan University
Sergey V. Buldyrev
Sergey V. Buldyrev Yeshiva University
H. E. Stanley
H. E. Stanley Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Engineering and Technology in the USA unlocks a range of related online degrees and career pathways. Many students discover the value of interdisciplinary skills—such as communications, business management, and project leadership—to boost their professional potential.

Those interested in sharpening their ability to convey complex technical information can consider the cheapest online communications degree programs. Engineering professionals with entrepreneurial aspirations may benefit from enrolling in the best MBA for entrepreneurship, which provides essential business skills for launching and leading tech startups.

If convenience and accessibility are priorities, prospective students can pursue an MBA online no GMAT required, streamlining the admission process while offering robust business and leadership training. For those aiming to specialize in managing complex projects commonly found in engineering and technology fields, a degree in project management online can build in-demand organizational and strategic skills.

Pursuing these online degree options can expand your professional landscape, combining technical expertise with valuable communication, business, and management abilities.

Best Scientists Citing Marc Barthelemy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles