World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 47 6144 5710 3342 3030 111 9703

Cristine H. Legare publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Cristine H. Legare between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Cristine H. Legare published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 6 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2018. 13 of the 132 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2018. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 10 publications
2004 2025

132 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Cristine H. Legare: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 1
2006 0
2007 1
2008 3
2009 3
2010 3
2011 7
2012 3
2013 10
2014 9
2015 5
2016 11
2017 8
2018 12
2019 5
2020 9
2021 12
2022 9
2023 7
2024 3
2025 10
Total 132
Download as CSV

Cristine H. Legare publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cristine H. Legare sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 111 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 111
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Cristine H. Legare D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cristine H. Legare sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 47
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Cristine H. Legare is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences, with significant contributions to subfields including Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology, Education, Sociology and Political Science, and General Health Professions.

The core topics explored in their work include:

  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Child Nutrition and Water Access

Legare has published extensively in several academic venues. The most frequent publication venues are:

  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • Developmental Science
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Child Development
  • Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

The scientist's work often arises in collaboration with other researchers, including frequent co-authors such as Oskar Bürger, Sudipta Mondal, Bruce Rawlings, Faiz A. Hashmi, and Vivian Dzokoto.

Representative recent publications are:

  • "Exploration, Explanation, and Parent-Child Interaction in Museums" (2020), Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development
  • "Sensing the presence of gods and spirits across cultures and faiths" (2021), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Similarities and differences in concepts of mental life among adults and children in five cultures" (2021), Nature Human Behaviour
  • "Ritual explained: interdisciplinary answers to Tinbergen's four questions" (2020), Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • "Relations between parent-child interaction and children's engagement and learning at a museum exhibit about electric circuits" (2020), Developmental Science

Legare's research investigates themes such as the interaction between cultural context and psychological development, particularly focusing on childhood learning and parent-child dynamics. Their contributions intersect with understanding the role of ritual, cultural cognition, and educational environments in shaping developmental outcomes.

Best Publications

  • The persistent sampling bias in developmental psychology: A call to action

    Mark Nielsen;Mark Nielsen;Daniel Haun;Joscha Kärtner;Cristine H. Legare

  • Investigating the links between the subcomponents of executive function and academic achievement: a cross-cultural analysis of Chinese and American preschoolers.

    Xuezhao Lan;Cristine H. Legare;Claire Cameron Ponitz;Su Li

  • Imitation and Innovation: The Dual Engines of Cultural Learning

    Cristine H. Legare;Mark Nielsen;Mark Nielsen

  • The coexistence of natural and supernatural explanations across cultures and development.

    Cristine H. Legare;E. Margaret Evans;Karl S. Rosengren;Paul L. Harris

  • Bewitchment, Biology, or Both: The Co‐Existence of Natural and Supernatural Explanatory Frameworks Across Development

    Cristine H. Legare;Susan A. Gelman

  • Stick to the script: The effect of witnessing multiple actors on children’s imitation

    Patricia A. Herrmann;Cristine H. Legare;Paul L. Harris;Harvey Whitehouse

  • The Social Functions of Group Rituals

    Rachel E. Watson-Jones;Cristine H. Legare

  • Inconsistency With Prior Knowledge Triggers Children’s Causal Explanatory Reasoning

    Cristine H. Legare;Susan A. Gelman;Henry M. Wellman

  • Concepts and Folk Theories

    Susan A. Gelman;Cristine H. Legare

  • Exploring Explanation: Explaining Inconsistent Evidence Informs Exploratory, Hypothesis-Testing Behavior in Young Children

    Cristine H. Legare

  • Imitative flexibility and the development of cultural learning.

    Cristine H. Legare;Nicole J. Wen;Patricia A. Herrmann;Harvey Whitehouse

  • Evaluating ritual efficacy: evidence from the supernatural.

    Cristine H. Legare;André L. Souza

  • Task-specific effects of ostracism on imitative fidelity in early childhood☆

    Rachel E. Watson-Jones;Cristine H. Legare;Harvey Whitehouse;Jennifer M. Clegg

  • In-Group Ostracism Increases High-Fidelity Imitation in Early Childhood

    Rachel E. Watson-Jones;Harvey Whitehouse;Cristine H. Legare

  • Developmental changes in the coherence of essentialist beliefs about psychological characteristics.

    Susan A. Gelman;Gail D. Heyman;Cristine H. Legare

  • Selective effects of explanation on learning during early childhood.

    Cristine H. Legare;Tania Lombrozo

  • Cumulative cultural learning: Development and diversity.

    Cristine H Legare

  • Evidence for an explanation advantage in naïve biological reasoning

    Cristine H. Legare;Henry M. Wellman;Susan A. Gelman

  • Explain This, Explore That: A Study of Parent–Child Interaction in a Children's Museum

    Aiyana K. Willard;Justin T.A. Busch;Katherine A. Cullum;Susan M. Letourneau

  • The Ontogeny of Cultural Learning.

    Cristine H. Legare;Paul L. Harris

  • Explaining prompts children to privilege inductively rich properties.

    Caren M. Walker;Tania Lombrozo;Cristine H. Legare;Alison Gopnik

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark Nielsen
Mark Nielsen University of Queensland
Susan A. Gelman
Susan A. Gelman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Harvey Whitehouse
Harvey Whitehouse University of Oxford
Tania Lombrozo
Tania Lombrozo Princeton University
David M. Sobel
David M. Sobel Brown University
Gail D. Heyman
Gail D. Heyman University of California, San Diego
Paul L. Harris
Paul L. Harris Harvard University
Maureen A. Callanan
Maureen A. Callanan University of California, Santa Cruz
Leslie J. Carver
Leslie J. Carver University of California, San Diego
Henry M. Wellman
Henry M. Wellman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens the door to a wide range of online programs and career paths. One of the most impactful fields is substance abuse counseling, where professionals help individuals overcome addiction and rebuild their lives. The journey to becoming a counselor often starts with earning a bachelor’s degree in psychology or a related field, followed by gaining practical experience and specialized certifications.

Specific requirements can vary significantly by location. For example, if you are interested in becoming a substance abuse counselor in Oakland, you’ll encounter different steps and state regulations compared to those aiming to learn how to become a substance abuse counselor in Oklahoma City. Similarly, Omaha substance abuse counselors education requirements and substance abuse counselor requirements in Orlando have their own criteria, including supervised internships and licensure exams.

Online psychology degrees offer the flexibility to start your journey towards these roles from anywhere in the country. They provide foundational knowledge while preparing you for the unique demands of each state’s counseling pathway.

Best Scientists Citing Cristine H. Legare

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles