World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Enrique Frias-Martinez

Enrique Frias-Martinez

Enrique Frias-Martinez publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Enrique Frias-Martinez between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Enrique Frias-Martinez published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 2.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 2013. 3 of the 79 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 2013. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 4 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 1 publication 2019: 3 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 1 publication
1999 2025

79 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Enrique Frias-Martinez: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 1
2001 2
2002 3
2003 1
2004 3
2005 3
2006 4
2007 3
2008 2
2009 6
2010 6
2011 5
2012 5
2013 7
2014 3
2015 1
2016 4
2017 1
2018 1
2019 3
2020 2
2021 5
2022 4
2023 0
2024 2
2025 1
Total 79
Download as CSV

Enrique Frias-Martinez publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Enrique Frias-Martinez sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Enrique Frias-Martinez D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Enrique Frias-Martinez sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Enrique Frias-Martinez is affiliated with Telefónica (Spain) and focuses research primarily within the intersecting fields of Social Sciences, Medicine, and Mathematics. Their work encompasses a range of subfields including Transportation, Modeling and Simulation, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Artificial Intelligence, and Global and Planetary Change.

Their research topics prominently cover Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis, COVID-19 epidemiological studies, Mosquito-borne diseases and control, Zoonotic diseases and public health, Data-Driven Disease Surveillance, Impact of Light on Environment and Health, and Crime Patterns and Interventions.

Key recent publications by Enrique Frias-Martinez include:

  • "Trade-offs between individual and ensemble forecasts of an emerging infectious disease" (2021), published in Nature Communications
  • "Enhancing short-term crime prediction with human mobility flows and deep learning architectures" (2022), published in EPJ Data Science
  • "Comparing sources of mobility for modelling the epidemic spread of Zika virus in Colombia" (2022), published in PLoS neglected tropical diseases
  • "Spatial sensitivity analysis for urban hotspots using cell phone traces" (2021), published in Environment and Planning B Urban Analytics and City Science
  • "The contribution of telco data to fight the COVID-19 pandemic: Experience of Telefonica throughout its footprint" (2021), published in Data & Policy

Frequent co-authors in Enrique Frias-Martinez's collaborations include Pedro A. de Alarcón, Rachel J. Oidtman, Elisa Omodei, Moritz U. G. Kraemer, and Carlos A Castañeda-Orjuela. These collaborations reflect multidisciplinary approaches that integrate data science, epidemiology, and urban analytics.

Their work has been published across multiple venues with repeated contributions to bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Nature Communications, EPJ Data Science, PLoS neglected tropical diseases, and Environment and Planning B Urban Analytics and City Science.

Best Publications

  • From mobile phone data to the spatial structure of cities

    Thomas Louail;Maxime Lenormand;Oliva G. Cantu Ros;Miguel Picornell

  • Characterizing Urban Landscapes Using Geolocated Tweets

    Vanessa Frias-Martinez;Victor Soto;Heath Hohwald;Enrique Frias-Martinez

  • Spectral clustering for sensing urban land use using Twitter activity

    Vanessa Frias-Martinez;Enrique Frias-Martinez

  • An Agent-Based Model of Epidemic Spread Using Human Mobility and Social Network Information

    Enrique Frias-Martinez;Graham Williamson;Vanessa Frias-Martinez

  • Uncovering the spatial structure of mobility networks

    Thomas Louail;Maxime Lenormand;Miguel Picornell;Oliva García Cantú

  • Cross-checking different sources of mobility information.

    Maxime Lenormand;Miguel Picornell;Oliva G. Cantú-Ros;Antònia Tugores

  • Support vector machines versus multi-layer perceptrons for efficient off-line signature recognition

    Enrique Frías-Martínez;Ángel Sánchez;José Francisco Vélez

  • Prediction of socioeconomic levels using cell phone records

    Victor Soto;Vanessa Frias-Martinez;Jesus Virseda;Enrique Frias-Martinez

  • Exploiting Foursquare and Cellular Data to Infer User Activity in Urban Environments

    Anastasios Noulas;Cecilia Mascolo

  • Modeling human behavior in user-adaptive systems: Recent advances using soft computing techniques

    E. Frias-Martinez;G. Magoulas;S. Chen;R. Macredie

  • Assessing the potential of ride-sharing using mobile and social data: a tale of four cities

    Blerim Cici;Athina Markopoulou;Enrique Frias-Martinez;Nikolaos Laoutaris

  • Survey of Data Mining Approaches to User Modeling for Adaptive Hypermedia

    E. Frias-martinez;S.Y. Chen;Xiaohui Liu

  • Automated land use identification using cell-phone records

    Víctor Soto;Enrique Frías-Martínez

  • Automated user modeling for personalized digital libraries

    E. Frias-Martinez;G. Magoulas;S. Chen;R. Macredie

  • Evaluation of a personalized digital library based on cognitive styles: Adaptivity vs. adaptability

    Enrique Frias-Martinez;Sherry Y. Chen;Xiaohui Liu

  • Comparing and modelling land use organization in cities

    Maxime Lenormand;Miguel Picornell;Oliva G. Cantú-Ros;Thomas Louail

  • Estimation of urban commuting patterns using cellphone network data

    Vanessa Frias-Martinez;Cristina Soguero;Enrique Frias-Martinez

  • A Characterization of the COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on a Mobile Network Operator Traffic

    Andra Lutu;Diego Perino;Marcelo Bagnulo;Enrique Frias-Martinez

  • Characterizing Dense Urban Areas from Mobile Phone-Call Data: Discovery and Social Dynamics

    Marcos R. Vieira;Vanessa Frias-Martinez;Nuria Oliver;Enrique Frias-Martinez

  • Comparing and modeling land use organization in cities

    Maxime Lenormand;Miguel Picornell;Oliva G. Cantú-Ros;Thomas Louail

Frequent Co-Authors

Sherry Y. Chen
Sherry Y. Chen National Central University
Nuria Oliver
Nuria Oliver European Laboratory for Learning and Intelligent Systems
Manuel Cebrian
Manuel Cebrian Carlos III University of Madrid
José J. Ramasco
José J. Ramasco Spanish National Research Council
Moritz U G Kraemer
Moritz U G Kraemer University of Oxford
Marc Barthelemy
Marc Barthelemy L'Institut de physique théorique
Xiaohui Liu
Xiaohui Liu Brunel University London
Nikolaos Laoutaris
Nikolaos Laoutaris Madrid Institute for Advanced Studies
Robert D. Macredie
Robert D. Macredie Brunel University London
Athina Markopoulou
Athina Markopoulou University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As technology evolves, students exploring Computer Science in the USA may also consider related online degrees and accelerated pathways. For those interested in big data and analytics, pursuing a data scientist degree can open doors to high-demand jobs and offer flexibility through online study.

Engineering fields continue to intersect with computer science. The online electrical engineering degree ranking is a great resource for finding top programs that you can complete remotely, leading to careers in automation, telecommunications, and more.

If you're seeking faster entry into the tech workforce, there are also 3-month certificate programs that pay well in IT, cybersecurity, and related fields. These certifications are often industry-aligned and focus on specific, in-demand skills.

For those looking to advance quickly, you can obtain a graduate credential in less time by exploring the shortest online masters degree options. These programs allow you to upskill or pivot careers efficiently.

Best Scientists Citing Enrique Frias-Martinez

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles