World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
35
Citations
5252
World Ranking
11697
National Ranking
734

Robert D. Macredie publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert D. Macredie sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 127 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Robert D. Macredie D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert D. Macredie sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert D. Macredie is affiliated with Brunel University London in the United Kingdom. Their research intersects the fields of Psychology and Computer Science, with particular emphasis on Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, and Surgery.

The scientist's recent publications include:

  • Chatbots to Support Young Adults' Mental Health: An Exploratory Study of Acceptability, 2022, ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems
  • The effects of augmented reality-supported instruction in tertiary-level medical education, 2021, British Journal of Educational Technology
  • Exploring Student Engagement and Outcomes: Experiences from Three Cycles of an Undergraduate Module, 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)

Main topics addressed in their work encompass:

  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Augmented Reality Applications
  • Surgical Simulation and Training
  • Anatomy and Medical Technology
  • Online Learning and Analytics

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Robert D. Macredie include Theodora Koulouri, David Olakitan, Athanasios Christopoulos, Νικόλαος Πέλλας, and Justyna Kurczaba.

They have contributed consistently to certain publication venues, notably:

  • ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems
  • British Journal of Educational Technology
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Best Publications

  • Cognitive styles and hypermedia navigation: development of a learning model

    Sherry Y. Chen;Robert D. Macredie

  • Effective Communication in Requirements Elicitation: A Comparison of Methodologies

    Jane Coughlan;Robert D. Macredie

  • Navigation in hypermedia learning systems: experts vs. novices

    Sherry Y. Chen;Jing-Ping Fan;Robert D. Macredie

  • Individual differences in virtual environments-introduction and overview

    Chaomei Chen;Mary Czerwinski;Robert Macredie

  • Teaching Introductory Programming: A Quantitative Evaluation of Different Approaches

    Theodora Koulouri;Stanislao Lauria;Robert D. Macredie

  • The assessment of usability of electronic shopping: A heuristic evaluation

    Sherry Y. Chen;Robert D. Macredie

  • The effects of comments and identifier names on program comprehensibility: an experimental investigation.

    Armstrong A. Takang;Penny A. Grubb;Robert D. Macredie

  • Cognitive Modeling of Student Learning in Web-Based Instructional Programs

    Sherry Y. Chen;Robert D. Macredie

  • Hypermedia learning and prior knowledge: domain expertise vs. system expertise

    Timothy John Frederick Mitchell;Sherry Y. Chen;Robert D. Macredie

  • Communication issues in requirements elicitation: A content analysis of stakeholder experiences

    Jane Coughlan;Mark Lycett;Robert D. Macredie

  • Modeling human behavior in user-adaptive systems: Recent advances using soft computing techniques

    E. Frias-Martinez;G. Magoulas;S. Chen;R. Macredie

  • Web-based interaction: A review of three important human factors

    Sherry Y. Chen;Robert Macredie

  • Introduction to the new usability

    Peter Thomas;Robert D. Macredie

  • Migrating agile methods to standardized development practice

    M. Lycett;R.D. Macredie;C. Patel;R.J. Paul

  • Editorial: Data mining for understanding user needs

    Sherry Y. Chen;Robert D. Macredie;Xiaohui Liu;Alistair Sutcliffe

  • Automated user modeling for personalized digital libraries

    E. Frias-Martinez;G. Magoulas;S. Chen;R. Macredie

  • Visualizing and tracking the growth of competing paradigms: two case studies

    Chaomei Chen;Timothy Cribbin;Robert Macredie;Sonali Morar

  • A theory-grounded framework of Open Source Software adoption in SMEs

    Robert D Macredie;Kabiru Mijinyawa

  • Games and the Design of Human‐Computer Interfaces

    Peter Thomas;Robert D. Macredie

  • Understanding the business-IT relationship

    Jane Coughlan;Mark Lycett;Robert D. Macredie

Frequent Co-Authors

Ray J. Paul
Ray J. Paul Brunel University London
Sherry Y. Chen
Sherry Y. Chen National Central University
Enrique Frias-Martinez
Enrique Frias-Martinez Telefónica (Spain)
George D. Magoulas
George D. Magoulas Birkbeck, University of London
Chaomei Chen
Chaomei Chen Drexel University
Mary Czerwinski
Mary Czerwinski Microsoft (United States)
Xiaohui Liu
Xiaohui Liu Brunel University London
Alistair Sutcliffe
Alistair Sutcliffe University of Manchester
Gheorghita Ghinea
Gheorghita Ghinea Brunel University London
Julie Barnett
Julie Barnett University of Bath

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA can open doors to numerous online study options. For those eager to enter the workforce quickly, choosing one of the fastest masters degree online programs is an efficient path to upskilling with minimal downtime. These accelerated programs help you advance rapidly in your career.

When considering which degree to pursue, focus on the most valuable masters degrees. These programs are highly sought after by employers and can significantly increase your earning potential in the tech industry.

Not everyone is ready for a full four-year commitment. An online associate degree in computer science provides foundational skills that can lead to entry-level jobs or serve as a stepping stone to a bachelor’s degree.

Affordability is also a crucial concern for many students. Choosing one of the cheapest online college options can help you minimize debt while earning a quality education.

Best Scientists Citing Robert D. Macredie

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles