World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
65
Citations
34117
World Ranking
2387
National Ranking
1192

Chaomei Chen publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chaomei Chen sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 272 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Chaomei Chen D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chaomei Chen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Chaomei Chen is affiliated with Drexel University in the United States. Their research portfolio encompasses a variety of topics within scientometrics and bibliometrics, with a focus on analyzing research trends and hotspots across disciplines related to mental health, neuroscience, and complex network analysis.

The recent research output of Chaomei Chen includes the following papers:

  • Half a century of research on antipsychotics and schizophrenia: A scientometric study of hotspots, nodes, bursts, and trends (2022) published in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Half a century of research on Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A scientometric study (2022) published in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Thirty years of research on negative symptoms of schizophrenia: A scientometric analysis of hotspots, bursts, and research trends (2022) published in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Bibliometric study on environmental, social, and governance research using CiteSpace (2023) published in Frontiers in Environmental Science
  • Thirty years of research on physical activity, mental health, and wellbeing: A scientometric analysis of hotspots and trends (2022) published in Frontiers in Public Health

The scientist frequently collaborates with the following co-authors:

  • Enrique Herrera-Viedma
  • Fei-Yue Wang
  • Adrian Stoica
  • Maria Pia Fanti
  • Keith W. Hipel

Chaomei Chen publishes regularly in several venues, including:

  • IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • PLoS ONE
  • Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics

Their work spans various subfields of study such as:

  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neurology

The main research topics covered by Chaomei Chen include:

  • Scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Best Publications

  • CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature

    Chaomei Chen

  • Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive knowledge domain visualization

    Chaomei Chen

  • The Structure and Dynamics of Co Citation Clusters: A Multiple Perspective Co-Citation Analysis.

    Chaomei Chen;Fidelia Ibekwe-Sanjuan;Jianhua Hou

  • Visualizing knowledge domains

    Katy Börner;Chaomei Chen;Kevin W. Boyack

  • Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature

    Chaomei Chen

  • Emerging trends in regenerative medicine: a scientometric analysis in CiteSpace

    Chaomei Chen;Zhigang Hu;Shengbo Liu;Hung Tseng

  • Visualizing a field of research: A methodology of systematic scientometric reviews.

    Chaomei Chen;Chaomei Chen;Min Song

  • The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters: A multiple-perspective cocitation analysis

    Chaomei Chen;Fidelia Ibekwe-SanJuan;Jianhua Hou

  • CiteSpace II: visualization and knowledge discovery in bibliographic databases.

    Marie B. Synnestvedt;Chaomei Chen;John H. Holmes

  • Emerging trends and new developments in regenerative medicine: a scientometric update (2000 – 2014)

    Chaomei Chen;Rachael Dubin;Meen Chul Kim

  • Information Visualization: Beyond the Horizon

    Chaomei Chen

  • Mapping Scientific Frontiers

    Chaomei Chen

  • Patterns of connections and movements in dual-map overlays: a new method of publication portfolio analysis

    Chaomei Chen;Loet Leydesdorff

  • Interacting with hypertext: a meta-analysis of experimental studies

    Chaomei Chen;Roy Rada

  • Top 10 unsolved information visualization problems

    C. Chen

  • Towards an Explanatory and Computational Theory of Scientific Discovery

    Chaomei Chen;Chaomei Chen;Yue Chen;Mark Horowitz;Haiyan Hou

  • Information Visualisation and Virtual Environments

    Chaomei Chen

  • visualising semantic spaces and author co-citation networks in digital libraries

    Chaomei Chen

  • Visualizing a knowledge domain's intellectual structure

    Chaomei Chen;R.J. Paul

  • Review of Mining the web: Discovering knowledge from hypertext data by Soumen Chakrabarti. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers 2003

    Chaomei Chen

Frequent Co-Authors

Katy Börner
Katy Börner Indiana University
Michael S. Vogeley
Michael S. Vogeley Drexel University
Ismael Rafols
Ismael Rafols Leiden University
Loet Leydesdorff
Loet Leydesdorff University of Amsterdam
Mary Czerwinski
Mary Czerwinski Microsoft (United States)
Kevin W. Boyack
Kevin W. Boyack SciTech Strategies
Robert D. Macredie
Robert D. Macredie Brunel University London
Ray J. Paul
Ray J. Paul Brunel University London
Min Song
Min Song Yonsei University
Paul L. Rosin
Paul L. Rosin Cardiff University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in computer science and related fields offers flexibility and new opportunities for learners from all backgrounds. For those beginning their journey, online associates programs provide a strong foundational start and can lead directly to in-demand tech roles or further study.

Budget can be a concern, but cheap online degrees fast allow you to earn your credentials quickly and affordably. These programs often cater to working professionals or individuals needing a flexible pace.

If academic history is a barrier, many online graduate programs that accept 2.0 gpa are available, supporting students with lower GPAs in gaining advanced skills and improving their career prospects.

Computer science degrees open doors in tech, but expanding your horizons can also lead to high-paying jobs with environmental science degree options. Cross-disciplinary skills—like data analytics and software development—are in demand across technology, science, and business sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Chaomei Chen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles