World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
51
Citations
8253
World Ranking
5426
National Ranking
324

Ray J. Paul publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ray J. Paul sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 267 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ray J. Paul D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ray J. Paul sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ray J. Paul is affiliated with Brunel University London in the United Kingdom. Their research profile is characterized by work conducted within this institution, contributing to the academic environment there.

No recent papers, co-authors, or publication venues are currently documented for Ray J. Paul.

No information is available regarding specific fields or subfields of study, main topics addressed, or books published by this researcher.

There are no recorded awards associated with Ray J. Paul at this time.

Best Publications

  • Review of "The labyrinths of information: Challenging the wisdoms of systems" by Claudio Ciborra, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2002

    Ray J. Paul

  • Investigating evaluation frameworks for health information systems.

    Maryati Mohd. Yusof;Anastasia Papazafeiropoulou;Ray J. Paul;Lampros K. Stergioulas

  • Visualizing a knowledge domain's intellectual structure

    Chaomei Chen;R.J. Paul

  • Simulation model reuse: definitions, benefits and obstacles

    Stewart Robinson;Richard E. Nance;Ray J. Paul;Michael Pidd

  • Quantitative and qualitative decision‐making methods in simulation modelling

    Tillal Eldabi;Zahir Irani;Ray J. Paul;Peter E.D. Love

  • On simulation model complexity

    Leonardo Chwif;Marcos Ribeiro Pereira Barretto;Ray J. Paul

  • Simulation modelling in healthcare: reviewing legacies and investigating futures

    Tillal Eldabi;Ray J. Paul;Terry Young

  • ERP problems and application integration issues: an empirical survey

    M. Themistocleous;Z. Irani;R.M. O'Keefe;R. Paul

  • Towards a Framework for Health Information Systems Evaluation

    M.Mohd. Yusof;R.J. Paul;L.K. Stergioulas

  • Evolutionary Web Development

    Arno Scharl;J. Kuljis;P. J. Thomas;R. J. Paul

  • Migrating agile methods to standardized development practice

    M. Lycett;R.D. Macredie;C. Patel;R.J. Paul

  • A case of an intervention in an outpatients department

    Brian Lehaney;Steve Clarke;Ray J. Paul

  • Evaluating business information systems fit: from concept to practical application

    P. Kanellis;M. Lycett;R. J. Paul

  • Web-based simulation: revolution or evolution?

    Ernest H. Page;Arnold Buss;Paul A. Fishwick;Kevin J. Healy

  • Multi-Product Inventory Situations with One Restriction

    E. Page;R. J. Paul

  • The Use of Soft Systems Methodology in the Development of a Simulation of Out-patient Services at Watford General Hospital

    Brian Lehaney;Ray J. Paul

  • Dynamic modeling to assess the business value of electronic commerce

    George M. Giaglis;Ray J. Paul;Georgios I. Doukidis

  • Simulation in healthcare management: a soft approach (MAPIU)

    Lynne P. Baldwin;Tillal Eldabi;Ray J. Paul

  • Simulation optimisation using a genetic algorithm

    Ray J Paul;Tomas S Chanev

  • Fitting the jigsaw of citation: information visualization in domain analysis

    Chaomei Chen;Ray J. Paul;Bob O'Keefe

  • Integrating simulation in organizational design studies

    George M Giaglis;Ray J Paul;Vlatka Hlupic

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert D. Macredie
Robert D. Macredie Brunel University London
George M. Giaglis
George M. Giaglis University of Nicosia
Wei-Tek Tsai
Wei-Tek Tsai Arizona State University
Chaomei Chen
Chaomei Chen Drexel University
Yogesh K. Dwivedi
Yogesh K. Dwivedi King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
George D. Magoulas
George D. Magoulas Birkbeck, University of London
Zahir Irani
Zahir Irani University of Bradford
Richard M. Fujimoto
Richard M. Fujimoto Georgia Institute of Technology
Xiaoying Bai
Xiaoying Bai Tsinghua University
Stewart Robinson
Stewart Robinson Loughborough University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in computer science opens up a wealth of options for students with varying backgrounds and goals. If affordability is your priority, consider cheap online college classes, which allow you to gain essential skills without a hefty tuition fee.

Don’t let past academic performance limit your ambitions. Many online graduate schools with low gpa requirements provide flexible admission paths, making advanced study more accessible than ever before.

A computer science degree online offers accelerated formats so you can jumpstart your career quickly and efficiently. If you’re eager to join the tech workforce sooner, explore the best computer science degree online programs for streamlined learning at your own pace.

Finally, remember that digital skills intersect with many other fields and careers. For example, see what can you do with an environmental science degree to understand how tech skills can open doors across industries, from research to policy analysis and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Ray J. Paul

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles