World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Paul Beynon-Davies

Paul Beynon-Davies

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
32
Citations
5034
World Ranking
13076
National Ranking
834

Paul Beynon-Davies publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Beynon-Davies sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 265 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Paul Beynon-Davies D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Beynon-Davies sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul Beynon-Davies is affiliated with Cardiff University in the United Kingdom. Their academic work includes contributions to the field through various publications and book authorship.

Their book publications include titles from two publishers:

  • World Scientific: Data and Society (2021), cited 4 times
  • Concordia University: Business Analysis and Design: Understanding Innovation in Organisation (2021), with no recorded citations

Best Publications

  • Understanding blockchain technology for future supply chains: a systematic literature review and research agenda

    Yingli Wang;Jeong Hugh Han;Paul Beynon-Davies

  • Reconfiguring the user : Using rapid Application Development

    Hugh Mackay;Chris Carne;Paul Beynon-Davies;Doug Tudhope

  • Older people and internet engagement: Acknowledging social moderators of internet adoption, access and use

    Rebecca A. Hill;Paul Beynon-Davies;Michael D. Williams

  • Information systems ‘failure’: the case of the London Ambulance Service's Computer Aided Despatch project

    P. Beynon-Davies

  • An exploration of the attitudes and strategic responses of sole-proprietor micro-enterprises in adopting information and communication technology

    Paul Jones;Geoff Simmons;Gary Packham;Paul Beynon-Davies

  • Constructing electronic government: the case of the UK inland revenue

    Paul Beynon-Davies

  • Rapid application development (RAD): an empirical review

    P. Beynon-Davies;C. Carne;H. Mackay;D. Tudhope

  • Information Systems: An Introduction To Informatics In Organisations

    Paul Beynon-Davies

  • Evaluating electronic local government in the UK

    Paul Beynon-Davies;Michael D Williams

  • Human error and information systems failure: the case of the London ambulance service computer-aided despatch system project

    Paul Beynon-Davies

  • Ebusiness barriers to growth within the SME sector

    Paul Jones;Paul Beynon‐Davies;Elizabeth Muir

  • Models for e‐government

    Paul Beynon-Davies

  • The diffusion of information systems development methods

    Paul Beynon-Davies;Michael D. Williams

  • Information systems evaluation and the information systems development process

    Paul Beynon‐Davies;Ian Owens;Michael D. Williams

  • Information systems prototyping in practice

    Paul Beynon-Davies;Douglas Tudhope;Hugh Mackay

  • Making sense of visual management through affordance theory

    Paul Beynon-Davies;Reeva Lederman

  • The utility of rapid application development in large‐scale, complex projects

    Hilary Berger;Paul Beynon-Davies

  • Ethnography and information systems development: Ethnography of, for and within is development

    Paul Beynon-Davies

  • Design breakdowns, scenarios and rapid application development

    Paul Beynon-Davies;Steve Holmes

  • Information Technology Usage in SMEs in a Developing Economy

    Ademola Afolayan;Eoin Plant;Gareth R.T. White;Paul Jones

  • Information Systems Management

    Paul Beynon-Davies

  • Business Information Systems

    Paul Beynon-Davies

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael D. Williams
Michael D. Williams Swansea University
David Pickernell
David Pickernell Swansea University
Christopher B. Jones
Christopher B. Jones Cardiff University
Stephen James Martin
Stephen James Martin Cardiff University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Computer Science degree in the USA can open doors to a variety of related fields and flexible study options. Many students and professionals are now looking for quick ways to enhance their skills and advance their careers without putting life on hold.

Online MBA programs are a popular choice for those seeking leadership roles that blend technical and business skills. These programs offer the convenience of remote learning with the added value of business acumen valuable in tech management.

Speed is often a priority. Those looking to upskill quickly may consider 1 year online masters programs. These intensive options can fast-track your credentialing and let you enter the workforce sooner.

High earning potential is another key factor. There are various online programs that pay well, allowing you to gain valuable, job-ready skills in less time and at a lower cost.

For those passionate about cutting-edge innovation, the best AI masters programs online make it possible to specialize in artificial intelligence while learning remotely, helping you to tap into one of the fastest-growing tech career paths.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Beynon-Davies

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles