World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
46
Citations
37480
World Ranking
6630
National Ranking
394

Helen Sharp publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helen Sharp sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 188 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Helen Sharp D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helen Sharp sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Helen Sharp is affiliated with The Open University in the United Kingdom. Their research work primarily focuses on fields including Computer Science and Business, Management and Accounting, with a significant number of publications spanning these areas.

Their subfields of study encompass Information Systems, Management of Technology and Innovation, Computer Science Applications, Strategy and Management, and Management Information Systems.

Main topics covered in their publications include:

  • Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Collaboration in agile enterprises
  • Open Source Software Innovations
  • Software Engineering Research
  • Service and Product Innovation
  • Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Quality and Supply Management

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Helen Sharp feature diverse themes and publication venues. These works include:

  • "Governing the second deep transition towards a circular economy: How rules emerge, align and diffuse" (2020) published in Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions
  • "UX information in the daily work of an agile team: A distributed cognition analysis" (2020) published in International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
  • "Tensions in Organizations Transforming to Agility" (2022) published in IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
  • "An onboarding model for integrating newcomers into agile project teams" (2021) published in Information and Software Technology
  • "The Case for Adaptive Security Interventions" (2021) published in ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology

Helen Sharp frequently publishes in venues such as Information and Software Technology, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, Ökologisches Wirtschaften - Fachzeitschrift, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), and SSRN Electronic Journal.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Helen Sharp include:

  • Leonor Barroca
  • Peggy Gregory
  • Luciana Zaina
  • Cleidson R. B. de Souza
  • Maduka Uwadi

Best Publications

  • Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction.

    Y Rogers;H Sharp;J Preece

  • Interaction Design

    Jenny Preece;Yvonne Rogers;Helen Sharp

  • Human-Computer Interaction

    Jenny Preece;Yvonne Rogers;Helen Sharp;David Benyon

  • Motivation in Software Engineering: A systematic literature review

    Sarah Beecham;Nathan Baddoo;Tracy Hall;Hugh Robinson

  • Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. Second Edition

    Yvonne Rogers;Helen Sharp;Jenny Preece

  • Stakeholder identification in the requirements engineering process

    H. Sharp;A. Finkelstein;G. Galal

  • Towards a framework for integrating agile development and user-centred design

    Stephanie Chamberlain;Helen Sharp;Neil Maiden

  • Models of motivation in software engineering

    Helen Sharp;Nathan Baddoo;Sarah Beecham;Tracy Hall

  • Beyond Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction

    Jenny Preece;Yvonne Rogers;Helen Sharp

  • An Ethnographic Study of XP Practice

    Helen Sharp;Hugh Robinson

  • Ethnographically-informed empirical studies of software practice

    Hugh Robinson;Judith Segal;Helen Sharp

  • Collaboration and co-ordination in mature eXtreme programming teams

    Helen Sharp;Hugh Robinson

  • Pedagogical Patterns: Advice For Educators

    J. Bergin;J. Eckstein;M. Manns;H. Sharp

  • Exploring the Influence of Identifier Names on Code Quality: An Empirical Study

    Simon Butler;Michel Wermelinger;Yijun Yu;Helen Sharp

  • The role of physical artefacts in agile software development: Two complementary perspectives

    Helen Sharp;Hugh Robinson;Marian Petre

  • The Role of Ethnographic Studies in Empirical Software Engineering

    Helen Sharp;Yvonne Dittrich;Cleidson R. B. de Souza

  • The challenges that challenge

    Peggy Gregory;Leonor Barroca;Helen Sharp;Advait Deshpande

  • Relating Identifier Naming Flaws and Code Quality: An Empirical Study

    Simon Butler;Michel Wermelinger;Yijun Yu;Helen Sharp

  • A systematic review of theory use in studies investigating the motivations of software engineers

    Tracy Hall;Nathan Baddoo;Sarah Beecham;Hugh Robinson

  • Knowledge transfer in pair programming: An in-depth analysis

    Laura Plonka;Helen Sharp;Janet van der Linden;Yvonne Dittrich

  • The Top 10 Burning Research Questions from Practitioners

    Sallyann Freudenberg;Helen Sharp

  • Agile Processes, in Software Engineering, and Extreme Programming: 17th International Conference, XP 2016, Edinburgh, UK, May 24-27, 2016, Proceedings

    Helen Sharp;Tracy Hall

Frequent Co-Authors

Marian Petre
Marian Petre The Open University
Tracy Hall
Tracy Hall Lancaster University
Bashar Nuseibeh
Bashar Nuseibeh The Open University
Rashina Hoda
Rashina Hoda Monash University
Yvonne Rogers
Yvonne Rogers University College London
Jenny Preece
Jenny Preece University of Maryland, College Park
Yijun Yu
Yijun Yu The Open University
Rafael Prikladnicki
Rafael Prikladnicki Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul
Gina Venolia
Gina Venolia Microsoft (United States)
Frank Maurer
Frank Maurer University of Calgary

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens the door to numerous online degree options, each offering unique career opportunities. Choosing the right college is essential, so it's helpful to explore lists of good online colleges that are recognized for quality and accreditation.

Specialized fields such as game development are growing rapidly. Students interested in digital entertainment can consider a game development online degree to gain skills relevant to the gaming industry.

Cybersecurity is also in high demand across various sectors. Pursuing one of the available cyber security degrees can help students prepare for roles protecting important digital assets and infrastructures.

Beyond traditional computing, tech-driven industries like construction management value technical expertise. If you're interested in both technology and large-scale project management, consider an affordable online construction management degree.

These online pathways make it easier than ever to access diverse tech careers, all from the flexibility and convenience of home.

Best Scientists Citing Helen Sharp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles