World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
7964
World Ranking
10082
National Ranking
4255

Gina Venolia publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gina Venolia sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 109 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Gina Venolia D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gina Venolia sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gina Venolia is affiliated with Microsoft in the United States, where they contribute to research and development activities within the organization. Their work is situated in the context of one of the leading technology companies globally, indicating a focus on applied and possibly industry-oriented research.

Although detailed records of recent publications, co-authors, and frequent venues are not available, the profile indicates a research practitioner actively engaged at Microsoft. The absence of listed papers or topics suggests that their contributions may be more operational or internal to the company's projects, or their research outputs have not been publicly cataloged in academic databases.

No specific book publications or awards have been listed, implying that their acclaimed contributions may primarily be in software development, research implementation, or technical leadership rather than in formal academic publishing or recognized research awards at this time.

The lack of information on main fields of study, subfields, and main topics of work suggests a profile oriented more towards applied science or technological innovation possibly in software engineering, human-computer interaction, or related areas typical of Microsoft's research environment. However, without explicit data, the exact thematic focus remains unspecified.

This scientist's professional activities occur within the research and development sector of a major corporation, emphasizing a role that blends technical expertise with practical applications in technology products and services. They hold a current position and have an ongoing affiliation with Microsoft, contributing to the technological advancements or research initiatives within the company.

Best Publications

  • Maintaining mental models: a study of developer work habits

    Thomas D. LaToza;Gina Venolia;Robert DeLine

  • Information Needs in Collocated Software Development Teams

    Andrew J. Ko;Robert DeLine;Gina Venolia

  • Method and apparatus for providing translucent images on a computer display

    Michael L. Gough;Joseph J. MacDougald;Gina D. Venolia;Thomas S. Gilley

  • The secret life of bugs: Going past the errors and omissions in software repositories

    Jorge Aranda;Gina Venolia

  • System and process for providing dynamic communication access and information awareness in an interactive peripheral display

    Jonathan J. Cadiz;Anoop Gupta;Gavin Jancke;Gina Venolia

  • Let's go to the whiteboard: how and why software developers use drawings

    Mauro Cherubini;Gina Venolia;Rob DeLine;Amy J. Ko

  • Designing and deploying an information awareness interface

    J. J. Cadiz;Gina Venolia;Gavin Jancke;Anoop Gupta

  • Understanding sequence and reply relationships within email conversations: a mixed-model visualization

    Gina Danielle Venolia;Carman Neustaedter

  • User Interface for a System and Process for Providing Dynamic Communication Access and Information Awareness in an Interactive Peripheral Display

    Jonathan J. Cadiz;Anoop Gupta;Gavin Jancke;Gina Venolia

  • Language modeling for soft keyboards

    Joshua Goodman;Gina Venolia;Keith Steury;Chauncey Parker

  • Supporting Email Workflow

    Gina Danielle Venolia;Laura Dabbish;JJ Cadiz;Anoop Gupta

  • Meerkat and Periscope: I Stream, You Stream, Apps Stream for Live Streams

    John C. Tang;Gina Venolia;Kori M. Inkpen

  • SearchBar: a search-centric web history for task resumption and information re-finding

    Dan Morris;Meredith Ringel Morris;Gina Venolia

  • Spell checking for text input via reduced keypad keys

    Joshua T. Goodman;Gina D. Venolia

  • Linking public spaces: technical and social issues

    Gavin Jancke;Gina Danielle Venolia;Jonathan Grudin;J. J. Cadiz

  • Embodied social proxy: mediating interpersonal connection in hub-and-satellite teams

    Gina Venolia;John Tang;Ruy Cervantes;Sara Bly

  • Focusing on shared experiences: moving beyond the camera in video communication

    Jed R. Brubaker;Gina Venolia;John C. Tang

  • Dynamic thumbnails for document navigation

    Robert DeLine;Mary Czerwinski;Brian R. Meyers;Gina Venolia

  • Facile 3D direct manipulation

    Gina Venolia

  • To Beam or Not to Beam: A Study of Remote Telepresence Attendance at an Academic Conference

    Carman Neustaedter;Gina Venolia;Jason Procyk;Daniel Hawkins

Frequent Co-Authors

John C. Tang
John C. Tang Microsoft (United States)
Kori Inkpen
Kori Inkpen Microsoft (United States)
Robert DeLine
Robert DeLine Microsoft (United States)
George G. Robertson
George G. Robertson Microsoft (United States)
Meredith Ringel Morris
Meredith Ringel Morris Google (United States)
Dan Morris
Dan Morris Google (United States)
Mary Czerwinski
Mary Czerwinski Microsoft (United States)
Helen Sharp
Helen Sharp The Open University
Carman Neustaedter
Carman Neustaedter Simon Fraser University
Steven M. Drucker
Steven M. Drucker Microsoft (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re exploring Computer Science in the USA, you may also want to consider related fields that offer promising career pathways and flexible online learning. Modern industries need tech-savvy professionals with diverse expertise, so expanding your skill set can open new opportunities.

For those interested in safeguarding communities or entering public service, a criminal justice major can be a strong alternative. Legal technology, cybersecurity, and digital forensics often overlap with computer science. Similarly, technology roles in finance are booming, making accounting classes online ideal for students interested in data analysis and financial systems.

Fast-growing sectors like artificial intelligence, machine learning, and analytics are accessible through online data science programs. These degrees build on computer science foundations and provide advanced, in-demand technical skills. Additionally, with the increased use of digital tools in building projects, a construction management bachelor degree can be a great fit for those interested in tech-supported project management.

With so many flexible online options, now is the time to explore diverse career pathways that complement and enhance your computer science journey.

Best Scientists Citing Gina Venolia

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles