World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
70
Citations
29385
World Ranking
6855
National Ranking
240

James E. Till publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James E. Till sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 177 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

James E. Till D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James E. Till sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2000 - Fellow of the Royal Society, United Kingdom

Overview

James E. Till is affiliated with the Ontario Institute for Cancer Research in Canada. Their research spans multiple fields, focusing primarily on sports medicine and social psychology. More specifically, their work involves orthopedics, sports medicine, and the study of ergonomics and musculoskeletal disorders.

The scientist has contributed to topics centered on sports performance and training, as well as ergonomics and musculoskeletal disorders. These areas reflect interdisciplinary research that combines physiological, biomechanical, and psychological aspects relevant to sports and physical health.

Recent publications by James E. Till include:

  • Is reducing weight categories the correct decision? The case of judo athletes with visual impairments under new categories (2025), published in Managing Sport and Leisure
  • Engineering O 2-Tolerant Chimeric Hydrogenases Optimized for Ferredoxin Coupling in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 (2025), published in ACS Synthetic Biology

Their work has appeared in journals such as Managing Sport and Leisure and ACS Synthetic Biology.

Collaborations have been noted with several frequent coauthors, including:

  • Rafael Lima Kons
  • Jonathan Ache Dias
  • Andrew M. Lane
  • Ross Cloak
  • Daniele Detanico

James E. Till was recognized as a Fellow of the Royal Society, United Kingdom in the year 2000.

Best Publications

  • A Direct Measurement of the Radiation Sensitivity of Normal Mouse Bone Marrow Cells

    James E. Till;Ernest A. McCulloch

  • Cytological Demonstration of the Clonal Nature of Spleen Colonies Derived from Transplanted Mouse Marrow Cells

    Andrew J. Becker;Ernest A. McCulloch;James E. Till

  • The distribution of colony‐forming cells among spleen colonies

    Louis Siminovitch;Ernest A. McCulloch;James E. Till

  • A STOCHASTIC MODEL OF STEM CELL PROLIFERATION, BASED ON THE GROWTH OF SPLEEN COLONY-FORMING CELLS

    James E. Till;Ernest A. McCulloch;Louis Siminovitch

  • The Effect of Differing Demands for Blood Cell Production on DNA Synthesis by Hemopoietic Colony-Forming Cells of Mice

    A. J. Becker;A. J. Becker;E. A. Mcculloch;E. A. Mcculloch;L. Siminovitch;L. Siminovitch;J. E. Till;J. E. Till

  • Colony Formation by Normal and Leukemic Human Marrow Cells in Culture: Effect of Conditioned Medium From Human Leukocytes

    N. N. Iscove;N. N. Iscove;J. S. Senn;J. S. Senn;J. E. Till;E. A. Mcculloch

  • A rapid method for the isolation of L-cell surface membranes using an aqueous two-phase polymer system.

    D. M. Brunette;J. E. Till

  • Cancer patients: their desire for information and participation in treatment decisions.

    H J Sutherland;H A Llewellyn-Thomas;G A Lockwood;D L Tritchler

  • Physical separation of hemopoietic stem cells from cells forming colonies in culture.

    R. G. Worton;E. A. McCulloch;J. E. Till

  • CYTOLOGICAL EVIDENCE FOR A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NORMAL HEMATOPOIETIC COLONY-FORMING CELLS AND CELLS OF THE LYMPHOID SYSTEM

    Alan M. Wu;James E. Till;Louis Siminovitch;Ernest A. McCulloch

  • Ouabain-resistant mutants of mouse and hamster cells in culture

    R.M. Baker;R.M. Baker;R.M. Baker;D.M. Brunette;D.M. Brunette;D.M. Brunette;R. Mankovitz;R. Mankovitz;R. Mankovitz;L.H. Thompson;L.H. Thompson;L.H. Thompson

  • The cellular basis of the genetically determined hemopoietic defect in anemic mice of genotype Sl-Sld.

    Ernest A. McCulloch;Louis Siminovitch;James E. Till;Elizabeth S. Russell

  • Spleen-Colony Formation in Anemic Mice of Genotype WW

    Ernest A. McCulloch;Louis Siminovitch;James E. Till

  • Hemopoietic stem cell differentiation

    J.E. Till;E.A. McCulloch

  • Pleiotropic phenotype of colchicine-resistant CHO cells: cross-resistance and collateral sensitivity.

    N. T. Bech-Hansen;J. E. Till;V. Ling

  • The Radiation Sensitivity of Normal Mouse Bone Marrow Cells, Determined by Quantitative Marrow Transplantation into Irradiated Mice

    Ernest A. McCulloch;James E. Till

  • COLONY ASSAY FOR PROLIFERATIVE BLAST CELLS CIRCULATING IN MYELOBLASTIC LEUKÆMIA

    R.N. Buick;J.E. Till;E.A. Mcculloch

  • DECLINE IN COLONY-FORMING ABILITY OF MARROW CELLS SUBJECTED TO SERIAL TRANSPLANTATION INTO IRRADIATED MICE.

    L. Siminovitch;J. E. Till;E. A. McCulloch

  • Interacting cell populations affecting granulopoietic colony formation by normal and leukemic human marrow cells.

    H. A. Messner;J. E. Till;E. A. McCulloch

  • DNA synthesis in individual L-strain mouse cells

    C.P. Stanners;J.E. Till

Frequent Co-Authors

Louis Siminovitch
Louis Siminovitch University of Toronto
Gina Lockwood
Gina Lockwood Canadian Partnership Against Cancer
Norman F. Boyd
Norman F. Boyd Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Donald M. Brunette
Donald M. Brunette University of British Columbia
Victor Ling
Victor Ling BC Cancer Research Centre
Tak W. Mak
Tak W. Mak Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Norman N. Iscove
Norman N. Iscove University of Toronto
Padraig Warde
Padraig Warde Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Rob Sanson-Fisher
Rob Sanson-Fisher University of Newcastle Australia
Gunther Eysenbach
Gunther Eysenbach University of Victoria

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing James E. Till

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles