World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
59
Citations
13385
World Ranking
3696
National Ranking
18

Richard J. Siegert publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard J. Siegert sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 234 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Richard J. Siegert D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard J. Siegert sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard J. Siegert is affiliated with Auckland University of Technology in New Zealand. Their research spans multiple disciplines within medicine and psychology, focusing on clinical and experimental aspects. The primary fields of study cover Medicine with 84 publications and Psychology with 65 publications. Within these, notable subfields include Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Emergency Medicine, and General Health Professions.

Siegert's scientific work addresses a variety of specific topics, with a strong emphasis on Traumatic Brain Injury Research, accounting for 44 publications. Other prominent topics include Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation, Mental Health Research Topics, Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions, as well as anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, and cognitive processes. The scope of their recent research also extends into COVID-19 and Mental Health issues.

Their frequent co-authors demonstrate collaborative engagement with other researchers in related fields. These include Ajit Narayanan, Christian U. Krägeloh, Deborah L. Snell, Alice Theadom, and Margaret Sandham. Co-authorship counts range from 10 to 14 joint publications.

Richard J. Siegert's research is often published in specialized venues related to mental health, rehabilitation, and brain injury. The most frequent publication outlets include the journal Mindfulness (4 publications), Brain Injury (3), Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (3), Disability and Rehabilitation (3), and Brain Impairment (3).

Recent papers representative of their work include:

  • Network Analysis of Mindfulness Facets, Affect, Compassion, and Distress, 2020, Mindfulness
  • Applying Generalizability Theory to Differentiate Between Trait and State in the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ), 2020, Mindfulness
  • Is the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire a Reliable and Valid Measure to Assess Long-Term Symptoms in Traumatic Brain Injury and Orthopedic Injury Patients? A Novel Investigation Using Rasch Analysis, 2020, Neurotrauma Reports
  • The post-ICU presentation screen (PICUPS) and rehabilitation prescription (RP) for intensive care survivors part I: Development and preliminary clinimetric evaluation, 2021, Journal of the Intensive Care Society
  • Evaluation of the Fear Avoidance Behavior after Traumatic Brain Injury Questionnaire, 2020, Journal of Neurotrauma

Best Publications

  • Depression in multiple sclerosis: a review

    R J Siegert;D A Abernethy

  • Toward a comprehensive theory of child sexual abuse: A theory knitting perspective

    Tony Ward;Richard J. Siegert

  • Theory of mind in schizophrenia: a critical review.

    Leigh Harrington;Richard J. Siegert;John Mcclure

  • Attachment style and intimacy deficits in sexual offenders: A theoretical framework

    Tony Ward;Stephen M. Hudson;William L. Marshall;Richard Siegert

  • Theoretical aspects of goal-setting and motivation in rehabilitation.

    Richard J Siegert;William J Taylor

  • Is goal planning in rehabilitation effective? A systematic review

    William M M Levack;Kathryn Taylor;Richard J Siegert;Sarah G Dean

  • Goal setting and strategies to enhance goal pursuit for adults with acquired disability participating in rehabilitation

    William M M Levack;Mark Weatherall;E Jean C Hay-Smith;Sarah G Dean

  • The development and validation of the King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease (K-BILD) health status questionnaire

    Amit Suresh Patel;Richard J Siegert;Katherine Brignall;Patrick Gordon

  • Areas of consensus and controversy about goal setting in rehabilitation: a conference report

    E Diane Playford;Richard Siegert;William Levack;Jennifer Freeman

  • A systematic review of measures of self-reported adherence to unsupervised home-based rehabilitation exercise programmes, and their psychometric properties

    Jessica C Bollen;Sarah G Dean;Richard J Siegert;Tracey E Howe

  • Is implicit sequence learning impaired in Parkinson's disease? A meta-analysis.

    Richard J. Siegert;Kathryn D. Taylor;Mark Weatherall;David A. Abernethy

  • Schizophrenia, theory of mind, and persecutory delusions.

    Leigh Harrington;Robyn Langdon;Richard J Siegert;John McClure

  • Navigating patient-centered goal setting in inpatient stroke rehabilitation: how clinicians control the process to meet perceived professional responsibilities.

    William M.M. Levack;Sarah Gerard Dean;Richard John Siegert;Kath Margaret McPherson

  • A systematic review of psychological treatments for mild traumatic brain injury: an update on the evidence.

    Deborah L. Snell;Lois J. Surgenor;E. Jean C. Hay-Smith;Richard J. Siegert

  • Using feedback from patient-reported outcome measures in mental health services: A scoping study and typology.

    Christian U. Krägeloh;Karol J. Czuba;D. Rex Billington;Paula Kersten

  • Rapists' Offense Processes A Preliminary Descriptive Model

    Devon L. L. Polaschek;Stephen M. Hudson;Tony Ward;Richard J. Siegert

  • Predictors of Two Types of Earthquake Preparation Survival Activities and Mitigation Activities

    Matthew J. Spittal;John McClure;Richard J. Siegert;Frank H. Walkey

  • Measuring mindfulness

    Unknown

  • Prevalence of symptoms in patients with multiple myeloma: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

    Christina Ramsenthaler;Christina Ramsenthaler;Pauline Kane;Wei Gao;Richard J. Siegert;Richard J. Siegert

  • Purposes and mechanisms of goal planning in rehabilitation: The need for a critical distinction

    William M M Levack;Sarah G Dean;Richard J Siegert;Kath M McPherson

  • Preserved implicit learning on both the serial reaction time task and artificial grammar in patients with Parkinson's disease.

    Jared Smith;Richard J. Siegert;John McDowall;David Abernethy

  • Toward a cognitive-affective model of goal-setting in rehabilitation: is self-regulation theory a key step?

    Richard J Siegert;Kathryn M McPherson;William J Taylor

Frequent Co-Authors

Irene J Higginson
Irene J Higginson King's College London
Christian U. Krägeloh
Christian U. Krägeloh Auckland University of Technology
Tony Ward
Tony Ward Victoria University of Wellington
Athol U. Wells
Athol U. Wells Imperial College London
Alexander Sumich
Alexander Sumich Nottingham Trent University
Mark Weatherall
Mark Weatherall University of Otago
Toby M. Maher
Toby M. Maher University of Southern California
Richard Harding
Richard Harding King's College London
John McClure
John McClure Victoria University of Wellington
Wei Gao
Wei Gao University of Auckland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens up flexible and accessible options for students across the country. Affordability is a major consideration, with many universities making efforts to offer programs that fit a variety of budgets. Whether you're considering undergraduate or graduate pathways, evaluating cost is crucial as tuition greatly varies by location and institution.

If budget is your top concern, you might want to look into the cheapest psychology programs in Bethlehem for lower tuition options in Pennsylvania, or consider the affordable psychology programs in Boca Raton if you are interested in studying in Florida.

Other top destinations like Massachusetts and California also offer competitive options. Take a look at affordable psychology programs in Boston and affordable psychology degrees in California for more choices.

With a degree in psychology, graduates can pursue roles in counseling, human resources, social services, or proceed to graduate studies for careers like clinical psychologist or researcher. Choosing the right online program can set the stage for a rewarding, diverse career.

Best Scientists Citing Richard J. Siegert

Trending Scientists