World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
48
Citations
10700
World Ranking
5889
National Ranking
36

Stephen M. Hudson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen M. Hudson sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 92 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Stephen M. Hudson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen M. Hudson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephen M. Hudson is affiliated with the University of Canterbury in New Zealand. Their primary research fields are within Medicine, with a specialization in Epidemiology and Hepatology.

Their research contributions include work focused on Hepatitis B Virus Studies and Hepatitis C virus research.

Publication venues where Stephen M. Hudson has contributed include:

  • Cancer Research

One recent paper authored involving Stephen M. Hudson is:

  • Abstract 807: RSV vaccine hesitancy among southern rural veterans with cancer in the Arkansas-Louisiana-Texas (ArkLATX) region: The impact of vaccine fatigue (2025), published in Cancer Research

Frequent co-authors in this research span several collaborators, including:

  • Philip A. Haddad
  • Crystal Barmer
  • Monica Craig
  • Ankita Gupta

Best Publications

  • Evidence-based guidelines for treating bipolar disorder: Revised third edition recommendations from the British Association for Psychopharmacology

    G. M. Goodwin;P. M. Haddad;I. N. Ferrier;J. K. Aronson

  • Motivational interviewing in health settings: a review

    Eileen Britt;Stephen M Hudson;Neville M Blampied

  • Empathy in sex offenders

    W.L. Marshall;S.M. Hudson;R. Jones;Yolanda Maria Fernandez

  • Cognitive distortions in sex offenders: An integrative review

    Tony Ward;Stephen M. Hudson;Lucy Johnston;William L. Marshall

  • Attachment style in sex offenders: A preliminary study

    Tony Ward;Stephen M. Hudson;William L. Marshall

  • A Descriptive Model of the Offense Chain for Child Molesters

    Tony Ward;Kirsten Louden;Stephen M. Hudson;William L. Marshall

  • Sexual assault in society: The role of the juvenile offender.

    Howard E. Barbaree;Stephen M. Hudson;Michael C. Seto

  • Attachment style and intimacy deficits in sexual offenders: A theoretical framework

    Tony Ward;Stephen M. Hudson;William L. Marshall;Richard Siegert

  • The juvenile sex offender

    Howard E. Barbaree;William L. Marshall;Stephen M. Hudson

  • A Model of the Relapse Process in Sexual Offenders

    Tony Ward;Stephen M. Hudson

  • An Examination of Intimacy and Loneliness in Sex Offenders

    Bonnie T. Seidman;W. L. Marshall;Stephen M. Hudson;Paul J. Robertson

  • Remaking Relapse Prevention with Sex Offenders: A Sourcebook

    D. Richard Laws;Stephen M. Hudson;Tony Ward

  • A Self-Regulation Model of Relapse Prevention

    Tony Ward;Stephen M. Hudson

  • Cognitive Distortions and Affective Deficits in Sex Offenders: A Cognitive Deconstructionist Interpretation1

    Tony Ward;Stephen M. Hudson;William L. Marshall

  • Understanding cognitive, affective, and intimacy deficits in sexual offenders: A developmental perspective

    Tony Ward;Thomas Keenan;Stephen M Hudson

  • Sourcebook of treatment programs for sexual offenders

    Unknown

  • Offense Pathways in Sexual Offenders

    Stephen M. Hudson;Tony Ward;Julie C. McCORMACK

  • Rapists' Offense Processes A Preliminary Descriptive Model

    Devon L. L. Polaschek;Stephen M. Hudson;Tony Ward;Richard J. Siegert

  • The Construction and Development of Theory in the Sexual Offending Area: A Metatheoretical Framework:

    Tony Ward;Stephen M. Hudson

  • Psychometric Assessment of Dynamic Risk Factors for Child Molesters

    Michael Allan;Randolph C. Grace;Bronwyn Rutherford;Stephen M. Hudson

  • The importance of attachment bonds in the development of juvenile sex offending.

    William L. Marshall;Stephen M. Hudson;Sharon Hodkinson

  • A Self-Regulation Model of the Sexual Offense Process:

    Tony Ward;Stephen M. Hudson;Thomas Keenan

  • Dynamic risk factors: the Kia Marama evaluation.

    Stephen M. Hudson;David S. Wales;Leon Bakker;Tony Ward

Frequent Co-Authors

Tony Ward
Tony Ward Victoria University of Wellington
William L. Marshall
William L. Marshall Queen's University
Lucy Johnston
Lucy Johnston University of Canterbury
Devon L. L. Polaschek
Devon L. L. Polaschek University of Waikato
Richard J. Siegert
Richard J. Siegert Auckland University of Technology
Howard E. Barbaree
Howard E. Barbaree University of Toronto
Neville M. Blampied
Neville M. Blampied University of Canterbury
Michael C. Seto
Michael C. Seto University of Ottawa
Randolph C. Grace
Randolph C. Grace University of Canterbury
Cynthia M. Bulik
Cynthia M. Bulik University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees in the USA opens up a wide range of career pathways, especially in the field of counseling. Many students are seeking accelerated programs to enter the workforce quickly while balancing their schedules. Choosing the right educational path can significantly impact how soon you can start working as a professional counselor.

When considering your options, it’s important to look at state-specific requirements and opportunities. For example, you can learn about the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Georgia or explore the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Hawaii. Some states, like Idaho, offer specialized programs known for speed, which you can find by reading about Idaho fastest counseling programs.

If you’re interested in the Midwest, check out the fastest way to become a counselor in Illinois. No matter where you plan to study, online degrees can provide flexibility and support for those aiming for a rewarding career in counseling and mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen M. Hudson

Recently Published Articles