World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Patrick Lussier

Patrick Lussier

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 37 9238 8635 628 589 152 5159

Patrick Lussier publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Patrick Lussier between 2000 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Patrick Lussier published across 27 years, from 2000 to 2026, averaging 6.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2021. 8 of the 177 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2021. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 5 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 28 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 6 publications 2026: 2 publications
2000 2026

177 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Patrick Lussier: publications per year, 2000 to 2026
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 2
2002 0
2003 0
2004 1
2005 5
2006 1
2007 2
2008 5
2009 6
2010 8
2011 14
2012 7
2013 6
2014 11
2015 12
2016 8
2017 10
2018 7
2019 4
2020 7
2021 28
2022 10
2023 8
2024 6
2025 6
2026 2
Total 177
Download as CSV

Patrick Lussier publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Lussier sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 152 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 152
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Patrick Lussier D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Lussier sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 37
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Patrick Lussier is affiliated with Université Laval in Canada and has a substantial body of research focused primarily on topics related to criminology, forensic psychiatry, and psychology. Their work spans multiple aspects of criminal behavior, particularly recidivism among sexual offenders and the broader criminal justice system.

Among their recent publications are the following:

  • A meta-analysis of trends in general, sexual, and violent recidivism among youth with histories of sex offending (2023) in Trauma Violence & Abuse
  • The sexual recidivism drop in Canada: A meta-analysis of sex offender recidivism rates over an 80-year period (2022) in Criminology & Public Policy
  • Sex Offender Recidivism: Some Lessons Learned From Over 70 Years of Research (2023) in Criminal Justice Review
  • Psychopathy and the prospective prediction of adult offending through age 29: Revisiting unfulfilled promises of developmental criminology (2020) in Journal of Criminal Justice

Lussier's research contributions include interdisciplinary perspectives combining social sciences and psychology with a strong focus on clinical psychology and sociology. The main fields of study represented in their work include:

  • Social Sciences
  • Psychology

Within these fields, Lussier has concentrated on subfields such as sociology and political science, clinical psychology, and general health professions. Their research topics cover areas including:

  • Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology

The scholar has frequently published in venues such as CrimRxiv, Journal of Criminal Justice, and Criminologie, among others. The most common publication venues include:

  • CrimRxiv
  • Journal of Criminal Justice
  • Criminologie
  • Trauma Violence & Abuse
  • International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology

Collaborative work is evident in the scholar's career, with frequent co-authorship by several researchers. Their most frequent collaborators are:

  • Evan McCuish
  • Julien Fréchette
  • Stéphanie Chouinard Thivierge
  • Raymond R. Corrado
  • Stéphanie Chouinard-Thivierge

Best Publications

  • The criminal activity of sexual offenders in adulthood: revisiting the specialization debate.

    Patrick Lussier

  • The generality of criminal behavior: A confirmatory factor analysis of the criminal activity of sex offenders in adulthood

    Patrick Lussier;Marc LeBlanc;Jean Proulx

  • Antisociality, Sexual Deviance, and Sexual Reoffending in Juvenile Sex Offenders A Meta-Analytical Investigation

    Kristie McCann;Patrick Lussier

  • Forensic psychiatric inpatients and aggression: an exploration of incidence, prevalence, severity, and interventions by gender.

    Tonia L. Nicholls;Johann Brink;Johann Brink;Caroline Greaves;Patrick Lussier

  • Criminal propensity, deviant sexual interests and criminal activity of sexual aggressors against women: A comparison of explanatory models.

    Patrick Lussier;Jean Proulx;Marc Leblanc

  • The adolescence-adulthood transition and Robins's continuity paradox: Criminal career patterns of juvenile and adult sex offenders in a prospective longitudinal birth cohort study

    Patrick Lussier;Arjan Blokland

  • Beyond sexual recidivism : a review of the sexual criminal career parameters of adult sex offenders

    Patrick Lussier;Jesse Cale

  • IS THE ANTISOCIAL CHILD FATHER OF THE ABUSIVE MAN? A 40-YEAR PROSPECTIVE LONGITUDINAL STUDY ON THE DEVELOPMENTAL ANTECEDENTS OF INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE*

    Patrick Lussier;David P. Farrington;Terrie E. Moffitt

  • Criminal Trajectories of Adult Sex Offenders and the Age Effect: Examining the Dynamic Aspect of Offending in Adulthood

    Patrick Lussier;Stacy Tzoumakis;Jesse Cale;Joanna Amirault

  • A person-oriented perspective on sexual offenders, offending trajectories, and risk of recidivism: A new challenge for policymakers, risk assessors, and actuarial prediction?

    Patrick Lussier;Garth Davies

  • A Developmental Taxonomy of Juvenile Sex Offenders for Theory, Research, and Prevention: The Adolescent-Limited and the High-Rate Slow Desister

    Patrick Lussier;Chantal Van den Berg;Catrien C. J. H. Bijleveld;jan Hendriks

  • Patterns of criminal achievement in sexual offending: Unravelling the “successful” sex offender

    Patrick Lussier;Martin Bouchard;Eric Beauregard

  • Rediscovering Quetelet, Again: The “Aging” Offender and the Prediction of Reoffending in a Sample of Adult Sex Offenders

    Patrick Lussier;Jay Healey

  • Developmental Pathways of Deviance in Sexual Aggressors

    Patrick Lussier;Benoit Leclerc;Jesse Cale;Jean Proulx

  • Psychopathic traits and offending trajectories from early adolescence to adulthood

    Evan C. McCuish;Raymond Corrado;Raymond Corrado;Patrick Lussier;Stephen D. Hart;Stephen D. Hart

  • The role of sexual interests and situational factors on rapists' modus operandi: Implications for offender profiling

    Eric Beauregard;Patrick Lussier;Patrick Lussier;Jean Proulx;Jean Proulx

  • An Exploration of Developmental Factors Related to Deviant Sexual Preferences Among Adult Rapists

    Eric Beauregard;Patrick Lussier;Jean Proulx

  • Sexual Sadism in the Context of Rape and Sexual Homicide An Examination of Crime Scene Indicators

    Jay Healey;Patrick Lussier;Eric Beauregard

  • Confessing their Crime: Factors Influencing the Offender’s Decision to Confess to the Police

    Nadine Deslauriers‐Varin;Patrick Lussier;Michel St‐Yves

  • Pathways to Sexual Aggression

    Jean Proulx;Eric Beauregard;Patrick Lussier;Benoit Leclerc

Frequent Co-Authors

Jean Proulx
Jean Proulx University of Montreal
Eric Beauregard
Eric Beauregard Simon Fraser University
Arjan Blokland
Arjan Blokland Maastricht University
Martin Bouchard
Martin Bouchard Simon Fraser University
Stephen D. Hart
Stephen D. Hart Simon Fraser University
Douglas A. Gentile
Douglas A. Gentile Iowa State University
Rolf Loeber
Rolf Loeber University of Pittsburgh
David P. Farrington
David P. Farrington University of Cambridge
Craig A. Anderson
Craig A. Anderson Iowa State University
Terrie E. Moffitt
Terrie E. Moffitt Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA has become more accessible thanks to a growing range of affordable online programs. These offerings cater to students from diverse backgrounds who seek flexibility and value. Choosing the right online degree can help minimize student debt, and it's important to compare options across different states and institutions.

For example, students looking for the most affordable psychology degree programs in Tuscaloosa will find several universities that offer competitive tuition rates. Similarly, learners researching the cheapest psychology degrees in Texas have numerous accredited programs to consider.

Those in Pennsylvania can explore affordable psychology programs in University Park, which combine quality education with cost-effectiveness. Meanwhile, prospective students in the West should review the cheapest psychology programs in Utah for additional budget-friendly options.

Earning an online psychology degree also opens doors to varied career pathways, including counseling, human resources, research, and further graduate study. Comparing program costs, accreditation, and career services are essential steps when planning your academic journey in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Patrick Lussier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles