World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
73
Citations
21656
World Ranking
1951
National Ranking
109

Stephen D. Hart publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen D. Hart sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 196 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Stephen D. Hart D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen D. Hart sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephen D. Hart is affiliated with Simon Fraser University in Canada. Their research primarily spans psychology and social sciences, with a particular focus on clinical psychology and sociology and political science as key subfields.

The scientist's work concentrates on several topics, including:

  • Psychopathy, forensic psychiatry, and sexual offending
  • Personality disorders and psychopathology
  • Stalking, cyberstalking, and harassment
  • Criminal justice and corrections analysis
  • Crime patterns and interventions
  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Gambling behavior and treatments

Their recent publications demonstrate a consistent interest in psychopathy and related areas. Notable papers include:

  • "Statement of concerned experts on the use of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in capital sentencing to assess risk for institutional violence," 2020, Psychology Public Policy and Law
  • "How much does that cost? Examining the economic costs of crime in North America attributable to people with psychopathic personality disorder," 2022, Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment
  • "Urgent issues and prospects in correctional rehabilitation practice and research," 2022, Legal and Criminological Psychology
  • "Evaluating the Test Validity of the Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality Symptom Rating Sale (CAPP SRS)," 2021, Journal of Personality Assessment
  • "Forecasting Stalking Recidivism Using the Guidelines for Stalking Assessment and Management (SAM)," 2022, Assessment

Frequent coauthors include Kevin S. Douglas, Dylan T. Gatner, P. Randall Kropp, David DeMatteo, and Kirk Heilbrun. These collaborations emphasize research consistency within the fields of personality disorders and forensic psychology.

The scientist regularly publishes in specialized venues including:

  • Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment
  • CrimRxiv
  • Psychology Public Policy and Law
  • Legal and Criminological Psychology
  • Assessment

Overall, their body of work reflects a multifaceted approach to understanding psychopathy, personality disorders, and related forensic and clinical psychological phenomena, incorporating issues from economic impacts of crime to practical rehabilitation and risk assessment methodologies.

Best Publications

  • Psychopathy and the DSM-IV Criteria for Antisocial Personality Disorder

    Robert D. Hare;Stephen D. Hart;Timothy J. Harpur

  • The revised Psychopathy Checklist: Reliability and factor structure.

    Robert D. Hare;Timothy J. Harpur;A. R. Hakstian;Adelle E. Forth

  • Assessing emotional intelligence: reliability and validity of the Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ-i) in university students

    Darek Dawda;Stephen D. Hart

  • Psychosis as a risk factor for violence to others: a meta-analysis.

    Kevin S. Douglas;Laura S. Guy;Stephen D. Hart

  • The role of psychopathy in assessing risk for violence: Conceptual and methodological issues

    Stephen D. Hart

  • Performance of male psychopaths following conditional release from prison.

    Stephen D. Hart;Philip R. Kropp;Robert D. Hare

  • Assessment of psychopathy in male young offenders.

    Adelle E. Forth;Stephen D. Hart;Robert D. Hare

  • The Psychopathy Checklist—Revised (PCL-R)

    Stephen D. Hart;Robert D. Hare;Timothy J. Harpur

  • Psychopathy: Assessment and association with criminal conduct.

    Stephen D. Hart;Robert D. Hare

  • Precision of actuarial risk assessment instruments: evaluating the 'margins of error' of group v. individual predictions of violence.

    Stephen D. Hart;Christine Michie;David John Cooke

  • Reconstructing psychopathy: clarifying the significance of antisocial and socially deviant behavior in the diagnosis of psychopathic personality disorder.

    David J. Cooke;Christine Michie;Stephen D. Hart;Daniel A. Clark

  • The Spousal Assault Risk Assessment (SARA) Guide: reliability and validity in adult male offenders

    P. Randall Kropp;Stephen D. Hart

  • The assessment of psychopathy in male and female noncriminals: Reliability and validity

    Adelle E. Forth;Shelley L. Brown;Stephen D. Hart;Robert D. Hare

  • Discriminant validity of the psychopathy checklist in a forensic psychiatric population

    Stephen D. Hart;Robert D. Hare

  • Evaluation of a model of violence risk assessment among forensic psychiatric patients.

    Kevin S Douglas;James Robert P Ogloff;Stephen D Hart

  • Evaluating the Screening Version of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist—Revised (PCL:SV): An item response theory analysis.

    David J. Cooke;Christine Michie;Stephen D. Hart;Robert D. Hare

  • Evidence for Long-Term, Specific Effects of Childhood Abuse and Neglect on Criminal Behavior in Men

    Donald G. Dutton;Stephen D. Hart

  • DSM-IV antisocial personality disorder field trial.

    Thomas A. Widiger;Remi Cadoret;Robert Hare;Lee Robins

  • Predictive validity of the Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version for general and violent recidivism

    Raymond R. Corrado;Gina M. Vincent;Stephen D. Hart;Irwin M. Cohen

  • Psychopathy as a risk marker for violence: Development and validation of a screening version of the revised Psychopathy Checklist.

    Stephen D. Hart;Robert D. Hare;Adelle E. Forth

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert D. Hare
Robert D. Hare University of British Columbia
Kevin S. Douglas
Kevin S. Douglas Simon Fraser University
David J. Cooke
David J. Cooke Australian Catholic University
Ronald Roesch
Ronald Roesch Simon Fraser University
Adelle E. Forth
Adelle E. Forth Carleton University
James R. P. Ogloff
James R. P. Ogloff Swinburne University of Technology
Donald G. Dutton
Donald G. Dutton University of British Columbia
John F. Edens
John F. Edens Texas A&M University
Sheilagh Hodgins
Sheilagh Hodgins University of Montreal
Matt DeLisi
Matt DeLisi Iowa State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens diverse career pathways, including roles like substance abuse counseling. Many students pursue licensure as addiction counselors, a profession in high demand across the USA. While specific requirements vary by location, you’ll find that a bachelor’s or master’s degree in psychology is often the foundation. Online degrees make it easier to meet these requirements while balancing studies with existing commitments.

Each state and city sets unique criteria. For example, Long Beach substance abuse counselor certification requirements include supervised clinical hours and passing a state exam. If you’re interested in the West Coast, learn more about becoming a substance abuse counselor in Los Angeles, where specialized certification is essential.

Interested in opportunities further east? The substance abuse counselor requirements in Louisville and the Lubbock substance abuse counselor certification requirements illustrate the location-based differences for licensure and continuing education. No matter the city, pursuing an online degree in psychology can set you on a rewarding professional path.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen D. Hart

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles