World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Adelle E. Forth

Adelle E. Forth

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
34
Citations
10771
World Ranking
10011
National Ranking
694

Adelle E. Forth publications per year

1985: 1 publications 1986: 1 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 1 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 1 publications 2006: 1 publications 2007: 1 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 1 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 1 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 7 publications
1985 2025

117 publications in total across all disciplines

Adelle E. Forth publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adelle E. Forth sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 109 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Adelle E. Forth D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adelle E. Forth sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Adelle E. Forth is affiliated with Carleton University in Canada, focusing on research within psychology and social sciences. Their work predominantly engages with clinical psychology and intersects with sociology, political science, gender studies, social psychology, and health.

Their scholarly output addresses several main topics:

  • Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
  • Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Child Abuse and Trauma

Forth has coauthored extensively with several collaborators including:

  • Joanna Pozzulo
  • Craig Bennell
  • Vasileia Karasavva
  • Kristopher J. Brazil
  • Jessie Swanek

Their recent published papers illustrate focused research interests:

  • "Psychopathy", 2021, Nature Reviews Disease Primers
  • "Personality, Attitudinal, and Demographic Predictors of Non-consensual Dissemination of Intimate Images", 2021, Journal of Interpersonal Violence
  • "Toxic Relationships: The Experiences and Effects of Psychopathy in Romantic Relationships", 2021, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology
  • "From myth to reality: sexual image abuse myth acceptance, the Dark Tetrad, and non-consensual intimate image dissemination proclivity", 2022, Journal of Sexual Aggression
  • "Putting the Y in cyberflashing: Exploring the prevalence and predictors of the reasons for sending unsolicited nude or sexual images", 2022, Computers in Human Behavior

Forth's work has appeared frequently in certain academic venues, including:

  • Nature Reviews Disease Primers
  • Computers in Human Behavior
  • Personality and Individual Differences
  • Journal of Interpersonal Violence
  • Current Psychology

Their book publications include a contribution to the field of forensic psychology:

  • Forensic Psychology (2021), Psychology Press eBooks

Best Publications

  • The Hare Psychopathy Checklist—Youth Version.

    Angela S. Book;Adelle E. Forth;Heather J. Clark

  • The revised Psychopathy Checklist: Reliability and factor structure.

    Robert D. Hare;Timothy J. Harpur;A. R. Hakstian;Adelle E. Forth

  • Assessment of psychopathy in male young offenders.

    Adelle E. Forth;Stephen D. Hart;Robert D. Hare

  • Male psychopaths and their criminal careers.

    Robert D. Hare;Leslie M. McPherson;Adelle E. Forth

  • The assessment of psychopathy in male and female noncriminals: Reliability and validity

    Adelle E. Forth;Shelley L. Brown;Stephen D. Hart;Robert D. Hare

  • Psychopathy : theory, research, and implications for society

    David J. Cooke;Adelle E. Forth

  • Factor structure of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version (PCL: YV) in incarcerated adolescents.

    Craig S. Neumann;David S. Kosson;Adelle E. Forth;Robert D. Hare

  • Psychopathy in Adolescence: Assessment, Violence, and Developmental Precursors

    Adelle E. Forth;Heather C. Burke

  • DSM-IV antisocial personality disorder field trial.

    Thomas A. Widiger;Remi Cadoret;Robert Hare;Lee Robins

  • A Meta-Analysis Exploring the Relationship Between Psychopathy and Instrumental Versus Reactive Violence

    Julie Blais;Elizabeth Solodukhin;Elizabeth Solodukhin;Adelle E. Forth

  • Psychopathy and sexual assault: static risk factors, emotional precursors, and rapist subtypes.

    Shelley L. Brown;Adelle E. Forth

  • Psychopathy as a risk marker for violence: Development and validation of a screening version of the revised Psychopathy Checklist.

    Stephen D. Hart;Robert D. Hare;Adelle E. Forth

  • Performance of criminal psychopaths on selected neuropsychological tests.

    Stephen D. Hart;Adelle E. Forth;Robert D. Hare

  • Measures of Criminal Attitudes and Associates (MCAA): development, factor structure, reliability, and validity.

    Jeremy F. Mills;Daryl G. Kroner;Adelle E. Forth

  • A new method for assessing the interpersonal behavior of psychopathic individuals: Preliminary validation studies.

    David S. Kosson;Brian L. Steuerwald;Adelle E. Forth;Katherine J. Kirkhart

  • Instrumentally violent youths: the roles of psychopathic traits, empathy, and attachment

    Jillian I. Flight;Adelle E. Forth

  • The MCMI-II and Psychopathy

    Stephen D. Hart;Adelle E. Forth;Robert D. Hare

  • Psychopathy

    Unknown

  • The contingent negative variation in psychopaths.

    Adelle E. Forth;Robert D. Hare

  • Remembering details of emotional events: A comparison between psychopathic and nonpsychopathic offenders

    Sven-Åke Christianson;Adelle E. Forth;Robert D. Hare;Catherine Strachan

  • The Assessment of psychopathy in male and female noncriminals

    A.-E. Forth;R.-D. Hare;S.-D. Hart;S.-L. Brown

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert D. Hare
Robert D. Hare University of British Columbia
Stephen D. Hart
Stephen D. Hart Simon Fraser University
Daryl G. Kroner
Daryl G. Kroner Southern Illinois University Carbondale
David S. Kosson
David S. Kosson Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science
Erik Simonsen
Erik Simonsen University of Copenhagen
Randall T. Salekin
Randall T. Salekin University of Alabama
Essi Viding
Essi Viding University College London
Eva R. Kimonis
Eva R. Kimonis University of New South Wales
Craig S. Neumann
Craig S. Neumann University of North Texas

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees offers flexibility and a wide range of options for those interested in mental health, counseling, or research careers. Many students seek affordable programs to minimize debt while accessing quality education. For instance, the cheapest psychology programs in Vermont provide budget-friendly alternatives without compromising rigorous curriculum standards.

Geography also plays a significant role in shaping career pathways. If you’re looking to connect with established professionals or a strong alumni network, consider popular psychology degrees in Charlotte, where a thriving urban setting supports numerous internship and employment opportunities. Likewise, studying in the nation’s capital is attractive for those drawn to policy work or federal agencies—see a list of popular psychology programs in Washington, D.C.

Regional factors extend even further, with programs tailored to different community needs and industry connections. For those near the East Coast, the popular psychology programs in Delaware highlight specialized tracks and growing demand in healthcare, education, and social services. No matter where you study, online degrees open doors to rewarding roles across clinical, academic, and corporate settings.

Best Scientists Citing Adelle E. Forth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles