World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 153 70 40 503 91610

Rolf Loeber publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rolf Loeber between 1971 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rolf Loeber published across 53 years, from 1971 to 2023, averaging 10.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2011. 1 of the 546 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1971 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2011. 1971: 1 publication 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 2 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 7 publications 1990: 14 publications 1991: 18 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 11 publications 1995: 12 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 21 publications 1999: 17 publications 2000: 20 publications 2001: 18 publications 2002: 21 publications 2003: 21 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 23 publications 2006: 19 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 23 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 32 publications 2012: 32 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 26 publications 2015: 25 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication
1971 2023

546 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rolf Loeber: publications per year, 1971 to 2023
Year Publications
1971 1
1972 1
1973 0
1974 0
1975 2
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 1
1980 0
1981 2
1982 2
1983 2
1984 3
1985 4
1986 3
1987 4
1988 5
1989 7
1990 14
1991 18
1992 8
1993 9
1994 11
1995 12
1996 10
1997 11
1998 21
1999 17
2000 20
2001 18
2002 21
2003 21
2004 10
2005 23
2006 19
2007 16
2008 23
2009 16
2010 18
2011 32
2012 32
2013 15
2014 26
2015 25
2016 20
2017 11
2018 6
2019 4
2020 0
2021 1
2022 0
2023 1
Total 546
Download as CSV

Rolf Loeber publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rolf Loeber sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 501–510 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 503 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23 503
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Rolf Loeber D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rolf Loeber sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 144+ D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 153 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98 153
Download as CSV

Overview

Rolf Loeber was affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States. Their research spanned several disciplines including social sciences, environmental science, and psychology, with a particular focus on sociology and political science, management, monitoring, policy and law, as well as clinical psychology.

Their scholarly work addressed a range of topics predominantly related to youth and social dynamics. Key topics included psychosocial factors impacting youth, Korean urban and social studies, crime patterns and interventions, child abuse and trauma, and criminal justice and corrections analysis.

Among their recent academic contributions was the paper titled Associations between Heavy Drinking and Changes in Impulsive Behavior among Adolescent Males, published in 2020 in UNC Libraries. This publication brought together elements of behavioral study and public health concerns as they relate to adolescence.

Throughout their career, Loeber collaborated with several frequent coauthors including:

  • Helene R. White
  • Naomi R. Marmorstein
  • Fulton T. Crews
  • Marsha E. Bates
  • Eun-Young Mun

Their publications were featured primarily in venues such as UNC Libraries, reflecting a targeted approach to dissemination within specific academic communities. The span of their work across multiple fields and topics indicated a multidisciplinary approach to social science research.

Loeber's academic activities contributed to broader understandings of social behavior, justice systems, and youth-related issues, particularly through empirical studies intersecting psychology and social policy.

Best Publications

  • Early predictors of male delinquency: a review.

    R. Loeber;T. Dishion

  • Family Factors as Correlates and Predictors of Juvenile Conduct Problems and Delinquency

    Rolf Loeber;Magda Stouthamer-Loeber

  • Developmental Trajectories of Childhood Disruptive Behaviors and Adolescent Delinquency: A Six-Site, Cross-National Study

    Lisa M. Broidy;Daniel S. Nagin;Richard E. Tremblay;John E. Bates

  • Key issues in the development of aggression and violence from childhood to early adulthood

    Rolf Loeber;Dale Hay

  • The Reactive-Proactive Aggression Questionnaire: Differential Correlates of Reactive and Proactive Aggression in Adolescent Boys.

    Adrian Raine;Kenneth A. Dodge;Rolf Loeber;Lisa Gatzke-Kopp

  • Development and risk factors of juvenile antisocial behavior and delinquency.

    Rolf Loeber

  • Serious and Violent Juvenile Offenders: Risk Factors and Successful Interventions

    Carl-Gunnar Janson;Rolf Loeber;David P. Farrington

  • Oppositional defiant and conduct disorder: a review of the past 10 years, part I.

    Rolf Loeber;Jeffrey D. Burke;Benjamin B. Lahey;Alaina Winters

  • Development of juvenile aggression and violence. Some common misconceptions and controversies

    Rolf Loeber;Magda Stouthamer-Loeber

  • The stability of antisocial and delinquent child behavior: A review.

    Rolf Loeber

  • Young children who commit crime: Epidemiology, developmental origins, risk factors, early interventions, and policy implications

    Rolf Loeber;David P. Farrington

  • Antisocial Behavior and Mental Health Problems: Explanatory Factors in Childhood and Adolescence

    Rolf Loeber;David P. Farrington;Magda Stouthamer-Loeber;Welmoet B. Van Kammen

  • Toward a Developmental Criminology

    Rolf Loeber;Marc Le Blanc

  • Developmental pathways in disruptive child behavior

    Rolf Loeber;Phen Wung;Kate Keenan;Bruce Giroux

  • Academic Performance and Delinquency

    Eugene Maguin;Rolf Loeber

  • Oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder: a review of the past 10 years, part II.

    Jeffrey D. Burke;Rolf Loeber;Boris Birmaher

  • Developmental change in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in boys: a four-year longitudinal study.

    Elizabeth L. Hart;Benjamin B. Lahey;Rolf Loeber;Brooks Applegate

  • Interaction between conduct disorder and its comorbid conditions: Effects of age and gender

    Rolf Loeber;Kate Keenan

  • Patterns and correlates of agreement between parent, teacher, and male adolescent ratings of externalizing and internalizing problems.

    Eric Youngstrom;Rolf Loeber;Magda Stouthamer-Loeber

  • Longitudinal Evidence that Psychopathy Scores in Early Adolescence Predict Adult Psychopathy

    Donald R. Lynam;Avshalom Caspi;Terrie E. Moffitt;Rolf Loeber

Frequent Co-Authors

Magda Stouthamer-Loeber
Magda Stouthamer-Loeber University of Pittsburgh
David P. Farrington
David P. Farrington University of Cambridge
Benjamin B. Lahey
Benjamin B. Lahey University of Chicago
Dustin A. Pardini
Dustin A. Pardini Arizona State University
Alison E. Hipwell
Alison E. Hipwell University of Pittsburgh
Helene R. White
Helene R. White Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Jeffrey D. Burke
Jeffrey D. Burke University of Connecticut
Kate Keenan
Kate Keenan University of Chicago
Machteld Hoeve
Machteld Hoeve University of Amsterdam
Stephanie D. Stepp
Stephanie D. Stepp University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens up many related online educational and career opportunities—including in fields like social work, counseling, and human services. Many psychology graduates explore advanced social work roles, which commonly require specialized degrees and certifications that can now be earned online from accredited programs across the USA.

There has been a rising demand for popular social work degrees in Arizona, showing that students value flexibility and local relevance. Similarly, the community of Duluth, Minnesota, is recognized for its popular social work degrees in Duluth, reflecting strong regional interest in social services.

In North Carolina, students increasingly seek popular social work degrees in North Carolina online, expanding their employment prospects while balancing life and study. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, stands out for offering some of the most popular social work degree programs in Pittsburgh, further illustrating the broad appeal and accessibility of these pathways.

Whether you pursue counseling, case management, or clinical support, online degrees provide flexible and diverse routes for psychology graduates looking to make a difference in people’s lives—locally and nationwide.

Best Scientists Citing Rolf Loeber

Recently Published Articles