World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 52 4980 4618 529 500 278 11223

Manuel Eisner publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Manuel Eisner between 1987 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Manuel Eisner published across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025, averaging 10.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 58 publications in 2021. 54 of the 423 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 58. Peak 58 publications in 2021. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 3 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 30 publications 2021: 58 publications 2022: 46 publications 2023: 36 publications 2024: 30 publications 2025: 24 publications
1987 2025

423 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Manuel Eisner: publications per year, 1987 to 2025
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 0
1989 0
1990 3
1991 0
1992 3
1993 1
1994 1
1995 0
1996 1
1997 3
1998 3
1999 3
2000 1
2001 1
2002 2
2003 7
2004 5
2005 5
2006 15
2007 7
2008 6
2009 11
2010 6
2011 12
2012 12
2013 10
2014 11
2015 14
2016 12
2017 9
2018 17
2019 17
2020 30
2021 58
2022 46
2023 36
2024 30
2025 24
Total 423
Download as CSV

Manuel Eisner publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Manuel Eisner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 271–280 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 278 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151 278
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Manuel Eisner D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Manuel Eisner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390 52
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Manuel Eisner is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on psychology and social sciences, with notable contributions to clinical psychology, sociology and political science, social psychology, health, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

The main topics covered in their work include child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, crime patterns and interventions, bullying, victimization, and aggression, intimate partner and family violence, child abuse and trauma, behavioral health and interventions, and maternal mental health during pregnancy and postpartum.

Their recent publications demonstrate a strong engagement with contemporary social and psychological issues, especially relating to young adults and the impacts of COVID-19. Notable papers include:

  • Non-compliance with COVID-19-related public health measures among young adults in Switzerland: Insights from a longitudinal cohort study, 2020, Social Science & Medicine
  • Emotional distress in young adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence of risk and resilience from a longitudinal cohort study, 2022, Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
  • A global analysis of the impact of COVID-19 stay-at-home restrictions on crime, 2021, Nature Human Behaviour
  • Self-injury from early adolescence to early adulthood: age-related course, recurrence, and services use in males and females from the community, 2020, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • Cohort Profile: The Zurich Project on the Social Development from Childhood to Adulthood (z-proso), 2022, Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology

Eisner frequently collaborates with a group of researchers, with the most common co-authors being:

  • Denis Ribeaud
  • Aja Louise Murray
  • Lilly Shanahan
  • Annekatrin Steinhoff
  • Laura Bechtiger

Their work has been published extensively in several academic venues known for research in developmental and social sciences:

  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence
  • Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • The Journal of Early Adolescence

Best Publications

  • Long-Term Historical Trends in Violent Crime

    Manuel Eisner

  • Non-compliance with COVID-19-related public health measures among young adults in Switzerland: Insights from a longitudinal cohort study.

    Amy Nivette;Denis Ribeaud;Aja Louise Murray;Annekatrin Steinhoff

  • Modernization, Self‐Control and Lethal Violence. The Long‐term Dynamics of European Homicide Rates in Theoretical Perspective

    Melanie Eisner

  • Drawing conclusions about causes from systematic reviews of risk factors: The Cambridge Quality Checklists

    Joseph Murray;David P. Farrington;Manuel P. Eisner

  • Violence Between the Police and the Public: Influences of Work-Related Stress, Job Satisfaction, Burnout, and Situational Factors

    Patrik Manzoni;Manuel Eisner

  • A global analysis of the impact of COVID-19 stay-at-home restrictions on crime.

    Amy E. Nivette;Renee Zahnow;Raul Aguilar;Andri Ahven

  • The development of the general factor of psychopathology 'p factor' through childhood and adolescence

    Aja Louise Murray;Manuel Eisner;Denis Ribeaud

  • Are Moral Disengagement, Neutralization Techniques, and Self-Serving Cognitive Distortions the Same? Developing a Unified Scale of Moral Neutralization of Aggression

    Denis Ribeaud;Manuel P. Eisner

  • The Effectiveness of Two Universal Preventive Interventions in Reducing Children's Externalizing Behavior: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

    Tina Malti;Denis Ribeaud;Manuel P. Eisner

  • From Swords to Words: Does Macro-Level Change in Self-Control Predict Long-Term Variation in Levels of Homicide?

    Manuel Eisner

  • Aggressive and Violent Behavior

    Manuel P. Eisner;Tina Malti

  • Modernity Strikes Back? A Historical Perspective on the Latest Increase in Interpersonal Violence (1960–1990)

    Manuel Eisner

  • Honor killing attitudes amongst adolescents in Amman, Jordan.

    Manuel P. Eisner;Lana Ghuneim

  • A Longitudinal Study on Stability and Transitions Among Bullying Roles.

    Izabela Zych;Maria M. Ttofi;Vicente J. Llorent;David P. Farrington

  • Do legitimate polities have fewer homicides? A cross-national analysis

    Amy E. Nivette;Manuel P. Eisner

  • Developmental Predictors of Violent Extremist Attitudes: A Test of General Strain Theory

    Amy Nivette;Manuel Eisner;Denis Ribeaud

  • The Social and Developmental Antecedents of Legal Cynicism

    Amy E. Nivette;Manuel Eisner;Tina Malti;Denis Ribeaud

  • A Non-bipartite Propensity Score Analysis of the Effects of Teacher–Student Relationships on Adolescent Problem and Prosocial Behavior

    Ingrid Obsuth;Aja Louise Murray;Tina Malti;Philippe Sulger

  • Stages of Parental Engagement in a Universal Parent Training Program

    Manuel Eisner;Ursula Meidert

Frequent Co-Authors

Denis Ribeaud
Denis Ribeaud University of Zurich
Aja Louise Murray
Aja Louise Murray University of Edinburgh
Tina Malti
Tina Malti University of Toronto
Maria M. Ttofi
Maria M. Ttofi University of Cambridge
David P. Farrington
David P. Farrington University of Cambridge
Mark Tomlinson
Mark Tomlinson Queen's University Belfast
Lucie Cluver
Lucie Cluver University of Oxford
Joseph Murray
Joseph Murray Universidade Federal de Pelotas
Karen McKenzie
Karen McKenzie Northumbria University
Lilly Shanahan
Lilly Shanahan University of Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology in the USA often leads students to consider related fields and career routes, such as social work. Many aspiring professionals value the flexibility of online degrees and are especially interested in programs that offer affordability alongside comprehensive education.

For those targeting specific locations, options like affordable social work degrees in Arkansas and the cheapest social work degrees in Atlanta provide avenues to enter the field without excessive financial burden. Similarly, students in the Southwest can consider the most affordable social work degree programs in Arizona for cost-effective learning that aligns with regional needs.

Northeast learners are not left behind; a range of affordable social work programs in Boston ensures that quality education remains accessible in major U.S. cities. These pathways allow Psychology graduates to branch into impactful fields, like counseling, advocacy, and community action, while balancing financial realities with professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Manuel Eisner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles