World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 46 6444 5999 434 408 204 8123

Tina Malti publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tina Malti between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tina Malti published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 10.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2016. 21 of the 243 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2016. 2003: 4 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 4 publications 2008: 18 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 8 publications
2003 2025

243 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tina Malti: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 4
2004 3
2005 1
2006 1
2007 4
2008 18
2009 11
2010 12
2011 8
2012 16
2013 13
2014 13
2015 11
2016 19
2017 13
2018 12
2019 9
2020 9
2021 12
2022 17
2023 16
2024 13
2025 8
Total 243
Download as CSV

Tina Malti publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tina Malti sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–210 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 204 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328 204
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Tina Malti D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tina Malti sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 46
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Tina Malti is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada. Their research primarily spans psychology and social sciences, with a strong focus on clinical psychology, social psychology, and education. They have contributed extensively to the study of child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, early childhood education and development, as well as issues related to child abuse and trauma.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Neuroendocrine Regulation and Behavior
  • Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Migration, Health and Trauma

Among recent publications are:

  • "Supporting Child Development Through Parenting Interventions in Low- to Middle-Income Countries: An Updated Systematic Review" (2021) in Frontiers in Public Health
  • "Kindness: a perspective from developmental psychology" (2020) in European Journal of Developmental Psychology
  • "Children and Violence: Nurturing Social-Emotional Development to Promote Mental Health" (2020) in Social policy report
  • "Moral Development in Adolescence" (2021) in Journal of Research on Adolescence
  • "Screening for economic hardship for child welfare-involved families during the COVID-19 pandemic: A rapid partnership response" (2020) in Child Abuse & Neglect

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Tina Malti include:

  • Tyler Colasante
  • Ruth Speidel
  • Marc Jambon
  • Emma Galarneau
  • Joanna Peplak

They have published multiple studies in the following venues:

  • Developmental Psychology
  • The Journal of Genetic Psychology
  • International Journal of Behavioral Development
  • Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
  • Social Development

Tina Malti's work, grounded in various subfields of psychology, emphasizes clinical aspects as well as social dimensions and educational impact. Their research addresses complex emotional, behavioral, and developmental issues faced by children and adolescents, with implications for mental health, social policy, and intervention strategies.

In recognition of their contributions to psychology, Tina Malti was named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2016.

Best Publications

  • Children's moral motivation, sympathy, and prosocial behavior

    Tina Malti;Michaela Gummerum;Monika Keller;Marlis Buchmann

  • The Relation of Moral Emotion Attributions to Prosocial and Antisocial Behavior: A Meta-Analysis

    Tina Malti;Tobias Krettenauer

  • The multifaceted phenomenon of ‘happy victimizers’: A cross‐cultural comparison of moral emotions

    Monika Keller;Orlando Lourenço;Tina Malti;Henrik Saalbach

  • Group Music Training and Children's Prosocial Skills.

    E. Glenn Schellenberg;Kathleen A. Corrigall;Sebastian P. Dys;Tina Malti

  • The development of moral emotions and moral reasoning.

    Tina Malti;Sophia F. Ongley

  • Moral reasoning and emotion attributions of adolescent bullies, victims, and bully‐victims

    Sonja Perren;Eveline Gutzwiller-Helfenfinger;Tina Malti;Shelley Hymel

  • The Effectiveness of Two Universal Preventive Interventions in Reducing Children's Externalizing Behavior: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

    Tina Malti;Denis Ribeaud;Manuel P. Eisner

  • The development of moral emotion expectancies and the happy victimizer phenomenon: A critical review of theory and application.

    Tobias Krettenauer;Tina Malti;Bryan W. Sokol

  • School-Based Interventions to Promote Empathy-Related Responding in Children and Adolescents: A Developmental Analysis

    Tina Malti;Maria Paula Chaparro;Antonio Zuffianò;Tyler Colasante

  • Aggressive and prosocial children's emotion attributions and moral reasoning.

    Tina Malti;Luciano Gasser;Marlis Buchmann

  • Children's interpretive understanding, moral judgments, and emotion attributions: Relations to social behaviour

    Tina Malti;Luciano Gasser;Eveline Gutzwiller-Helfenfinger

  • Aggressive and Violent Behavior

    Manuel P. Eisner;Tina Malti

  • The role of moral emotions in the development of children’s sharing behavior.

    Sophia F. Ongley;Tina Malti

  • Children's moral emotions and moral cognition: Towards an integrative perspective

    Tina Malti;Brigitte Latzko

  • Developmental trajectories of sympathy, moral emotion attributions, and moral reasoning: the role of parental support

    Tina Malti;Tina Malti;Nancy Eisenberg;Hyunji Kim;Marlis Buchmann

  • Long-Term Course of Schizophrenic Illness: Bleuler’s Study Reconsidered

    Jiri Modestin;Andreas Huber;Engin Satirli;Tina Malti

  • The Social and Developmental Antecedents of Legal Cynicism

    Amy E. Nivette;Manuel Eisner;Tina Malti;Denis Ribeaud

  • Toward an integrated clinical-developmental model of guilt

    Tina Malti

  • Social judgments and emotion attributions about exclusion in Switzerland.

    Tina Malti;Melanie Killen;Luciano Gasser

  • “Who is worthy of my generosity?” Recipient characteristics and the development of children’s sharing

    Tina Malti;Michaela Gummerum;Sophia Ongley;Maria Chaparro

Frequent Co-Authors

Manuel Eisner
Manuel Eisner University of Cambridge
Denis Ribeaud
Denis Ribeaud University of Zurich
Sonja Perren
Sonja Perren University of Konstanz
Melanie Killen
Melanie Killen University of Maryland, College Park
Cindy H. Liu
Cindy H. Liu Brigham and Women's Hospital
Kenneth H. Rubin
Kenneth H. Rubin University of Maryland, College Park
Peter C. M. Molenaar
Peter C. M. Molenaar Pennsylvania State University
Wulf Rössler
Wulf Rössler University of Zurich
Ken J. Rotenberg
Ken J. Rotenberg Keele University
Herbert Scheithauer
Herbert Scheithauer Freie Universität Berlin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring career options within psychology often leads students to consider related fields such as counseling, clinical therapy, and social work. An important factor for many prospective students is choosing an affordable pathway, especially when studying online and seeking quality education without high costs.

Several states offer flexible and budget-friendly options for those pursuing counseling degrees. For students interested in studying in the Rocky Mountains, there are many of the cheapest counseling programs in Colorado. Similarly, New England offers access to some of the cheapest counseling degrees in Connecticut, making it easier for local residents to find cost-effective programs.

In the Midwest, students searching for affordable education can explore affordable counseling degrees in Des Moines, which provide a balance of quality and accessibility. Likewise, those based in the Southeast have access to numerous affordable counseling degrees in Florida for even more options.

Choosing the right online degree or career pathway involves weighing factors such as accreditation, cost, flexibility, and program reputation. Exploring regional and affordable options can broaden your opportunities in psychology and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Tina Malti

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles