World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 34 10118 9469 5335 4870 107 6056

Cindy H. Liu publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Cindy H. Liu between 2008 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Cindy H. Liu published across 18 years, from 2008 to 2025, averaging 8.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2021. 40 of the 160 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2021. 2008: 4 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 3 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 3 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 31 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 24 publications
2008 2025

160 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Cindy H. Liu: publications per year, 2008 to 2025
Year Publications
2008 4
2009 0
2010 2
2011 2
2012 1
2013 3
2014 1
2015 3
2016 5
2017 7
2018 4
2019 6
2020 17
2021 31
2022 19
2023 15
2024 16
2025 24
Total 160
Download as CSV

Cindy H. Liu publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cindy H. Liu sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 107 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 107
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Cindy H. Liu D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cindy H. Liu sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 34
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Cindy H. Liu is affiliated with Brigham and Women's Hospital in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Medicine, with a significant focus on Clinical Psychology. The body of work encompasses subfields such as Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Social Psychology, and General Health Professions.

The scientist's research topics cover extensive areas, including:

  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Migration, Health and Trauma
  • COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access

Liu has authored numerous publications, with recent papers reflecting a focus on mental health challenges exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Notable works include:

  • "Factors associated with depression, anxiety, and PTSD symptomatology during the COVID-19 pandemic: Clinical implications for U.S. young adult mental health" (2020, Psychiatry Research)
  • "Potential Impact of COVID-19-Related Racial Discrimination on the Health of Asian Americans" (2020, American Journal of Public Health)
  • "Towards a youth mental health paradigm: a perspective and roadmap" (2023, Molecular Psychiatry)
  • "Risk factors for depression, anxiety, and PTSD symptoms in perinatal women during the COVID-19 Pandemic" (2020, Psychiatry Research)
  • "Priorities for addressing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on college student mental health" (2020, Journal of American College Health)

Liu frequently publishes in venues including Psychiatry Research, Journal of Affective Disorders, Journal of American College Health, American Journal of Public Health, and Journal of Psychiatric Research. The most prolific of these is Psychiatry Research, with 12 publications in total.

Collaborations form an important aspect of Liu's research, with frequent co-authors including Hyeouk Chris Hahm, Carmina Erdei, Justin A. Chen, Leena Mittal, and Sunah Hyun. The number of joint works with these collaborators ranges from 16 to 27, indicating sustained research partnerships.

Best Publications

  • The prevalence and predictors of mental health diagnoses and suicide among U.S. college students: Implications for addressing disparities in service use.

    Cindy H. Liu;Courtney Stevens;Sylvia H.M. Wong;Miwa Yasui

  • Towards a youth mental health paradigm: a perspective and roadmap

    Unknown

  • Potential Impact of COVID-19-Related Racial Discrimination on the Health of Asian Americans.

    Justin A. Chen;Emily Zhang;Cindy H. Liu

  • Evidence for elevated psychiatric distress, poor sleep, and quality of life concerns during the COVID-19 pandemic among U.S. young adults with suspected and reported psychiatric diagnoses.

    C.H. Liu;C.H. Liu;C. Stevens;R.C. Conrad;H.C. Hahm

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation among Ph.D. students

    Emily N. Satinsky;Tomoki Kimura;Mathew V. Kiang;Rediet Abebe

  • Risk factors for depression, anxiety, and PTSD symptoms in perinatal women during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

    Cindy H. Liu;Carmina Erdei;Leena Mittal

  • Rates and Predictors of Postpartum Depression by Race and Ethnicity: Results from the 2004 to 2007 New York City PRAMS Survey (Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System)

    Cindy H. Liu;Ed Tronick

  • Priorities for addressing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on college student mental health.

    Cindy H Liu;Stephanie Pinder-Amaker;Hyeouk Chris Hahm;Justin A Chen

  • College student mental health risks during the COVID-19 pandemic: Implications of campus relocation.

    Rachel C. Conrad;Hyeouk “Chris” Hahm;Amanda Koire;Stephanie Pinder-Amaker

  • Psychiatric Symptoms and Diagnoses Among U.S. College Students: A Comparison by Race and Ethnicity

    Justin A. Chen;Courtney Stevens;Sylvia H. M. Wong;Cindy H. Liu

  • Psychosocial Stress Contagion in Children and Families During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

    Cindy H. Liu;Stacey N. Doan

  • Perceived COVID-19-related anti-Asian discrimination predicts post traumatic stress disorder symptoms among Asian and Asian American young adults.

    Hyeouk Chris Hahm;Yoonsook Ha;Judith C Scott;Venissala Wongchai

  • The Impact of Social Media on College Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Multinational Review of the Existing Literature.

    Jessica M. Haddad;Jessica M. Haddad;Christina Macenski;Christina Macenski;Alison Mosier-Mills;Alice Hibara

  • Psychiatric impacts of the COVID-19 global pandemic on U.S. sexual and gender minority young adults.

    Kanika Kamal;Jason J. Li;Hyeouk Chris Hahm;Cindy H. Liu

  • Perinatal Risks and Childhood Premorbid Indicators of Later Psychosis: Next Steps for Early Psychosocial Interventions

    Cindy H. Liu;Matcheri S. Keshavan;Ed Tronick;Larry J. Seidman

  • Racial/ethnic disparities in US college students’ experience: Discrimination as an impediment to academic performance

    Courtney Stevens;Cindy H Liu;Justin A Chen

  • Psychological correlates of poor sleep quality among U.S. young adults during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Sunah Hyun;Hyeouk Chris Hahm;Ga Tin Fifi Wong;Emily Zhang

  • Maternal sensitivity in dyadic context: Mutual regulation, meaning-making, and reparation

    Marjorie Beeghly;Marina Fuertes;Cindy H. Liu;M. Susan Delonis

  • Experiences of COVID-19-related anti-Asian discrimination and affective reactions in a multiple race sample of U.S. young adults.

    Hyeouk Chris Hahm;Casey D Xavier Hall;Kana Tsurudome Garcia;Anna Cavallino

  • Innovations in biological assessments of chronic stress through hair and nail cortisol: Conceptual, developmental, and methodological issues

    Cindy H. Liu;Stacey N. Doan

  • Racial and Ethnic Differences in Prenatal Life Stress and Postpartum Depression Symptoms.

    Cindy H. Liu;Rebecca Giallo;Stacey N. Doan;Larry J. Seidman

Frequent Co-Authors

Tina Malti
Tina Malti University of Toronto
Larry J. Seidman
Larry J. Seidman Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Rebecca Giallo
Rebecca Giallo Deakin University
Marjorie Beeghly
Marjorie Beeghly Wayne State University
Ross A. Thompson
Ross A. Thompson University of California, Davis
Mark Tomlinson
Mark Tomlinson Queen's University Belfast
Günther Fink
Günther Fink Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute
Alexander C. Tsai
Alexander C. Tsai Harvard University
Thomas S. Weisner
Thomas S. Weisner University of California, Los Angeles
Jerrold S. Meyer
Jerrold S. Meyer University of Massachusetts Amherst

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online psychology degrees in the USA have become increasingly accessible, offering pathways for both traditional and non-traditional students. When exploring your options, location, program length, and career outcomes are all important factors. For example, the easiest online psychology programs in the South often emphasize flexibility and affordability, making them popular among working adults.

If you reside in Texas, you might consider the easiest online psychology degree programs in Texas, which are known for their student support services and transfer-friendly options. Meanwhile, the Wisconsin psychology programs online provide a range of specializations, preparing graduates for various settings such as counseling, social work, or human resources.

For learners hoping to accelerate their education, the accelerated online psychology programs in Arizona focus on helping students complete their degrees quickly without compromising academic quality. Ultimately, online programs open diverse career pathways, including mental health services, research, education, and more—meeting the needs of today’s dynamic workforce.

Best Scientists Citing Cindy H. Liu

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles