World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 113 4905 4604 2655 2462 443 52742

Steven L. Teitelbaum publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Steven L. Teitelbaum between 1959 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Steven L. Teitelbaum published across 68 years, from 1959 to 2026, averaging 7.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 36 publications in 2023. 6 of the 493 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1959 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 36. Peak 36 publications in 2023. 1959: 1 publication 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 2 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 1 publication 1969: 2 publications 1970: 2 publications 1971: 2 publications 1972: 3 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 5 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 8 publications 1977: 6 publications 1978: 10 publications 1979: 15 publications 1980: 10 publications 1981: 18 publications 1982: 15 publications 1983: 15 publications 1984: 10 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 9 publications 1987: 8 publications 1988: 8 publications 1989: 16 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 13 publications 1992: 9 publications 1993: 14 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 15 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 36 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 5 publications 2026: 1 publication
1959 2026

493 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Steven L. Teitelbaum: publications per year, 1959 to 2026
Year Publications
1959 1
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 2
1967 0
1968 1
1969 2
1970 2
1971 2
1972 3
1973 1
1974 5
1975 1
1976 8
1977 6
1978 10
1979 15
1980 10
1981 18
1982 15
1983 15
1984 10
1985 5
1986 9
1987 8
1988 8
1989 16
1990 7
1991 13
1992 9
1993 14
1994 7
1995 10
1996 5
1997 11
1998 5
1999 6
2000 15
2001 7
2002 8
2003 6
2004 9
2005 11
2006 8
2007 9
2008 8
2009 15
2010 11
2011 11
2012 12
2013 8
2014 6
2015 8
2016 4
2017 3
2018 5
2019 6
2020 6
2021 8
2022 4
2023 36
2024 3
2025 5
2026 1
Total 493
Download as CSV

Steven L. Teitelbaum publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven L. Teitelbaum sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 441–460 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 443 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771 443
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Steven L. Teitelbaum D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven L. Teitelbaum sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 112–113 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 113 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399 113
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - King Faisal Prize

Overview

Steven L. Teitelbaum is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas in medicine, particularly focusing on the interface of metabolism, bone health, and inflammation.

The main fields of study associated with Steven L. Teitelbaum include:

  • Medicine
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Within these broader areas, their work frequently touches upon several subfields, such as:

  • Oncology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Epidemiology
  • Surgery
  • Physiology

The researcher's main topics of work include:

  • Adipose Tissue and Metabolism
  • Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
  • Bone health and treatments
  • Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
  • Bone Metabolism and Diseases
  • COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Immune cells in cancer

Steven L. Teitelbaum has published extensively, with notable works appearing in key journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Aesthetic Surgery Journal
  • Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
  • UNC Libraries
  • Cell Metabolism

Some of their recent papers are:

  • "Intercellular Mitochondria Transfer to Macrophages Regulates White Adipose Tissue Homeostasis and Is Impaired in Obesity" (2020, Cell Metabolism)
  • "Adipose tissue is a critical regulator of osteoarthritis" (2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • "Ablation of Fat Cells in Adult Mice Induces Massive Bone Gain" (2020, Cell Metabolism)
  • "Hepatic lipids promote liver metastasis" (2020, JCI Insight)
  • "Why Do We Need Anatomical Implants? the Science and Rationale for Maintaining Their Availability and Use in Breast Surgery" (2020, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Steven L. Teitelbaum include:

  • Wei Zou
  • Nidhi Rohatgi
  • Yongjia Li
  • Lori B. Pitstick
  • Kathryn A. Wikenheiser-Brokamp

The scientist was awarded the King Faisal Prize in 2019, recognizing achievements in their research areas.

Best Publications

  • Bone Resorption by Osteoclasts

    Steven L. Teitelbaum

  • Genetic regulation of osteoclast development and function

    Steven L. Teitelbaum;F. Patrick Ross

  • TNF-α induces osteoclastogenesis by direct stimulation of macrophages exposed to permissive levels of RANK ligand

    Jonathan Lam;Sunao Takeshita;Jane E. Barker;Osami Kanagawa

  • Osteoclastic bone resorption by a polarized vacuolar proton pump

    Harry C. Blair;Steven L. Teitelbaum;Steven L. Teitelbaum;Robert Ghiselli;Stephen Gluck

  • β3-integrin–deficient mice are a model for Glanzmann thrombasthenia showing placental defects and reduced survival

    Kairbaan M. Hodivala-Dilke;Kevin P. McHugh;Dimitrios A. Tsakiris;Helen Rayburn

  • IL-1 mediates TNF-induced osteoclastogenesis

    Shi Wei;Hideki Kitaura;Ping Zhou;F. Patrick Ross

  • Osteoclasts: what do they do and how do they do it?

    Steven L. Teitelbaum

  • Mice lacking β3 integrins are osteosclerotic because of dysfunctional osteoclasts

    Kevin P. McHugh;Kairbaan Hodivala-Dilke;Ming-Hao Zheng;Noriyuki Namba

  • Osteopetrosis in mice lacking haematopoietic transcription factor PU.1

    M. M. Tondravi;S. R. McKercher;K. Anderson;J. M. Erdmann

  • Interactions between the bone matrix proteins osteopontin and bone sialoprotein and the osteoclast integrin alpha v beta 3 potentiate bone resorption.

    F. P. Ross;J. Chappel;J. I. Alvarez;D. Sander

  • Accelerated bone mineral loss in HIV-infected patients receiving potent antiretroviral therapy.

    Pablo Tebas;William G. Powderly;Sherry Claxton;Donna Marin

  • Notch signaling maintains bone marrow mesenchymal progenitors by suppressing osteoblast differentiation.

    Matthew J Hilton;Xiaolin Tu;Ximei Wu;Shuting Bai

  • Mechanisms of disease osteopetrosis

    Jakub Tolar;Steven L. Teitelbaum;Paul J. Orchard

  • Recognition of osteopontin and related peptides by an alpha v beta 3 integrin stimulates immediate cell signals in osteoclasts.

    A Miyauchi;J Alvarez;E M Greenfield;A Teti

  • Regulation of myc gene expression in HL-60 leukaemia cells by a vitamin D metabolite

    P. H. Reitsma;P. G. Rothberg;S. M. Astrin;J. Trial

  • Successful Bone-Marrow Transplantation for Infantile Malignant Osteopetrosis

    Peter F. Coccia;William Krivit;Jaroslav Cervenka;Carlyle Clawson

  • Induction of monocytic differentiation and bone resorption by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3.

    Zvi Bar-Shavit;Steven L. Teitelbaum;Pieter Reitsma;Ann Hall

  • Autophagy proteins regulate the secretory component of osteoclastic bone resorption

    Carl J. DeSelm;Brian C. Miller;Wei Zou;Wandy L. Beatty

  • Osteoclasts: New Insights

    Feng Xu;Steven L. Teitelbaum

  • Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Mediates Orthopedic Implant Osteolysis

    Kurt D. Merkel;Jeanne M. Erdmann;Kevin P. McHugh;Yousef Abu-Amer

Frequent Co-Authors

F. Patrick Ross
F. Patrick Ross Hospital for Special Surgery
Louis V. Avioli
Louis V. Avioli Washington University in St. Louis
Michael P. Whyte
Michael P. Whyte Washington University in St. Louis
Keith A. Hruska
Keith A. Hruska Washington University in St. Louis
Harry C. Blair
Harry C. Blair University of Pittsburgh
Eduardo Slatopolsky
Eduardo Slatopolsky Washington University in St. Louis
Haibo Zhao
Haibo Zhao Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Roberta Faccio
Roberta Faccio Washington University in St. Louis
Anna Teti
Anna Teti University of L'Aquila
Paul H. Schlesinger
Paul H. Schlesinger Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine doesn’t always require attending traditional, in-person programs. The rise of online learning has made advanced healthcare degrees more accessible and affordable than ever. For those interested in nursing, multiple online pathways can help you boost your credentials and expand your professional options.

If you’re looking for an economical way to advance your nursing education, consider the cheapest fnp programs online. These Family Nurse Practitioner programs enable Registered Nurses to step into advanced practice roles and provide primary care. Alternatively, those who want to upgrade their nursing qualification can pursue the cheapest rn to bsn online pathway, designed to help RNs earn a Bachelor of Science in Nursing.

For higher academic aspirations, a online nursing phd programs option can lead to careers in research, teaching, or leadership. Prospective students can also explore the cheapest online bsn programs for cost-effective ways to earn their bachelor’s in nursing online. Each of these routes offers flexibility and a range of opportunities to excel in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Steven L. Teitelbaum

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles