World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
72
Citations
15727
World Ranking
2341
National Ranking
1108

Scott R. Whittemore publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott R. Whittemore sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 206 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Scott R. Whittemore D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott R. Whittemore sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Scott R. Whittemore is affiliated with the University of Louisville in the United States. Their research primarily intersects the fields of medicine, neuroscience, and biochemistry, genetics and molecular biology, with a significant focus on spinal cord injury research and related neurological topics.

The scientist's body of work encompasses various specialized subfields including pathology and forensic medicine, endocrine and autonomic systems, molecular biology, cell biology, and cellular and molecular neuroscience.

Key topics explored in their research include:

  • Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
  • Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations
  • Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
  • Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease

The scientist has published extensively in several academic journals, with frequent publications in:

  • Scientific Reports
  • Glia
  • Journal of Neurotrauma
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • eLife

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Scott R. Whittemore include:

  • Long ascending propriospinal neurons provide flexible, context-specific control of interlimb coordination, 2020, eLife
  • Improved locomotor recovery after contusive spinal cord injury in Bmal1−/− mice is associated with protection of the blood spinal cord barrier, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Oligodendrocyte-specific deletion of Xbp1 exacerbates the endoplasmic reticulum stress response and restricts locomotor recovery after thoracic spinal cord injury, 2020, Glia
  • Age-associated temporal decline in butyrate-producing bacteria plays a key pathogenic role in the onset and progression of neuropathology and memory deficits in 3×Tg-AD mice, 2024, Gut Microbes
  • Silencing long-descending inter-enlargement propriospinal neurons improves hindlimb stepping after contusive spinal cord injuries, 2023, eLife

Scott R. Whittemore has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Michal Hetman
  • Sujata Saraswat Ohri
  • Kariena R. Andres
  • Darlene A. Burke
  • Brandon Brown

Best Publications

  • Pluripotent stem cells engrafted into the normal or lesioned adult rat spinal cord are restricted to a glial lineage.

    Qi lin Cao;Y. Ping Zhang;Russell M. Howard;Winston M. Walters

  • Development and regional expression of beta nerve growth factor messenger RNA and protein in the rat central nervous system

    Scott R. Whittemore;Ted Ebendal;Lena Larkfors;Lars Olson

  • The expression, localization and functional significance of β-nerve growth factor in the central nervous system

    Scott R. Whittemore;Åke Seiger

  • Stem cell repair of central nervous system injury.

    Qilin Cao;Richard L. Benton;Scott R. Whittemore

  • Schwann cells genetically modified to secrete human BDNF promote enhanced axonal regrowth across transected adult rat spinal cord

    Philippe Menei;Claudia Montero‐Menei;Scott R. Whittemore;Richard P. Bunge

  • Ret-dependent and -independent Mechanisms of Glial Cell Line-derived Neurotrophic Factor Signaling in Neuronal Cells

    Miles Trupp;Rizaldy Scott;Scott R. Whittemore;Carlos F. Ibáñez

  • Rat beta-nerve growth factor sequence and site of synthesis in the adult hippocampus.

    S. R. Whittemore;S. R. Whittemore;P. L. Friedman;D. Larhammar;H. Persson

  • Functional recovery in traumatic spinal cord injury after transplantation of multineurotrophin-expressing glial-restricted precursor cells.

    Qilin Cao;Xiao Ming Xu;William H. DeVries;Gaby U. Enzmann

  • Differentiation of engrafted neuronal-restricted precursor cells is inhibited in the traumatically injured spinal cord.

    Qi Lin Cao;Russell M. Howard;Jessica B. Dennison;Scott R. Whittemore

  • Decreased level of nerve growth factor (NGF) and its messenger RNA in the aged rat brain

    Lena Lärkfors;Ted Ebendal;Scott R. Whittemore;Håkan Persson

  • Transplantation of ciliary neurotrophic factor-expressing adult oligodendrocyte precursor cells promotes remyelination and functional recovery after spinal cord injury.

    Qilin Cao;Qian He;Qian He;Yaping Wang;Yaping Wang;Xiaoxin Cheng;Xiaoxin Cheng

  • Endogenous Nkx2.2+/Olig2+ oligodendrocyte precursor cells fail to remyelinate the demyelinated adult rat spinal cord in the absence of astrocytes.

    Jason F. Talbott;David N. Loy;David N. Loy;Ying Liu;Ying Liu;Mengsheng S. Qiu

  • Temporal progression of angiogenesis and basal lamina deposition after contusive spinal cord injury in the adult rat

    David N. Loy;Charles H. Crawford;Jessica B. Darnall;Darlene A. Burke

  • Expression of the receptors for the C5a anaphylatoxin, interleukin-8 and FMLP by human astrocytes and microglia.

    Marie Lacy;Jennifer Jones;Scott R. Whittemore;David L. Haviland

  • Mitogen and substrate differentially affect the lineage restriction of adult rat subventricular zone neural precursor cell populations.

    Scott R. Whittemore;Scott R. Whittemore;Dante J. Morassutti;Winston M. Walters;Rong-Huan Liu

  • Functional and electrophysiological changes after graded traumatic spinal cord injury in adult rat

    Qilin Cao;Yi Ping Zhang;Christopher Iannotti;Christopher Iannotti;William H. DeVries

  • Astrocytes from the Contused Spinal Cord Inhibit Oligodendrocyte Differentiation of Adult Oligodendrocyte Precursor Cells by Increasing the Expression of Bone Morphogenetic Proteins

    Yaping Wang;Xiaoxin Cheng;Xiaoxin Cheng;Qian He;Qian He;Yiyan Zheng

  • Functional considerations of stem cell transplantation therapy for spinal cord repair.

    Gaby U Enzmann;Richard L Benton;Jason F Talbott;Qilin Cao

  • Functional Redundancy of Ventral Spinal Locomotor Pathways

    David N. Loy;David S. K. Magnuson;Y. Ping Zhang;Stephen M. Onifer

  • Neuronotrophic factors for mammalian brain neurons: injury induction in neonatal, adult and aged rat brain.

    Scott R. Whittemore;Manuel Nieto-Sampedro;Dwight L. Needels;Carl W. Cotman

Frequent Co-Authors

David S.K. Magnuson
David S.K. Magnuson University of Louisville
Darlene A. Burke
Darlene A. Burke University of Louisville
Michal Hetman
Michal Hetman University of Louisville
Theo Hagg
Theo Hagg East Tennessee State University
Xiao Ming Xu
Xiao Ming Xu Indiana University
Mary Bartlett Bunge
Mary Bartlett Bunge University of Miami
Pantelis Tsoulfas
Pantelis Tsoulfas University of Miami
Peipei Ping
Peipei Ping University of California, Los Angeles
Åke Seiger
Åke Seiger Karolinska Institute
Henry J. Kaplan
Henry J. Kaplan University of Louisville

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience in the USA often inspires students to consider adjacent fields and flexible learning options. Online degrees in areas like psychology, counseling, and therapy not only support diverse career goals but also provide accessibility, affordability, and convenience.

For those interested in direct mental health support, it’s worth looking into the most affordable online masters in mental health counseling. These programs are ideal for students aiming to blend neuroscience with hands-on clinical practice. Similarly, there are reputable online counseling programs that offer flexible paths toward licensure and professional advancement.

Families and relationships are a cornerstone of psychological health, making the best online mft programs a strong choice for those drawn to therapy careers focusing on partnership and family dynamics.

If your interest is more research- or theory-based, you might wonder how much is a master's degree in psychology and what it can offer in terms of career direction. Many online options make advanced study more accessible financially, opening new roles in academia, healthcare, or industry.

Best Scientists Citing Scott R. Whittemore

Trending Scientists