World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
44
Citations
7192
World Ranking
7193
National Ranking
3106

Pantelis Tsoulfas publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pantelis Tsoulfas sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 70 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Pantelis Tsoulfas D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pantelis Tsoulfas sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Pantelis Tsoulfas is affiliated with the University of Miami in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within neuroscience, biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine. The primary fields of study associated with their work include Neuroscience, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine, with a total of 17 publications in neuroscience alone.

The scientist's subfields of study focus on Molecular Biology, Neurology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems. Their research topics cover various specialized subjects such as Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms, Spinal Cord Injury Research, Neuroscience of Respiration and Sleep, Neurogenesis and Neuroplasticity Mechanisms, Extracellular Vesicles in Disease, Single-cell and Spatial Transcriptomics, and Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations.

Tsoulfas has contributed to the following recent papers:

  • Single-cell analysis of the cellular heterogeneity and interactions in the injured mouse spinal cord, 2021, The Journal of Experimental Medicine
  • mGreenLantern: a bright monomeric fluorescent protein with rapid expression and cell filling properties for neuronal imaging, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Brain-wide analysis of the supraspinal connectome reveals anatomical correlates to functional recovery after spinal injury, 2022, eLife
  • Single Nuclei Analyses Reveal Transcriptional Profiles and Marker Genes for Diverse Supraspinal Populations, 2022, Journal of Neuroscience
  • Single cell analysis of the cellular heterogeneity and interactions in the injured mouse spinal cord, 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Tsoulfas include Murray G. Blackmore, Zimei Wang, Elizabeth Batsel, Lindsay M. Milich, and James S. Choi. Their publication record is distributed across venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Experimental Neurology, The Journal of Experimental Medicine, Journal of Neuroscience, and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Experimental Neurology
  • The Journal of Experimental Medicine
  • Journal of Neuroscience
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

  • Murray G. Blackmore
  • Zimei Wang
  • Elizabeth Batsel
  • Lindsay M. Milich
  • James S. Choi

Best Publications

  • Pluripotent stem cells engrafted into the normal or lesioned adult rat spinal cord are restricted to a glial lineage.

    Qi lin Cao;Y. Ping Zhang;Russell M. Howard;Winston M. Walters

  • Perivascular fibroblasts form the fibrotic scar after contusive spinal cord injury.

    Cynthia Soderblom;Xueting Luo;Ezra Blumenthal;Eric Bray

  • The rat trkC locus encodes multiple neurogenic receptors that exhibit differential response to neurotrophin-3 in PC12 cells

    Pantelis Tsoulfas;Dan Soppet;Enrique Escandon;Lino Tessarollo

  • Neurotrophin and Neurotrophin Receptors in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells: Regulation of Expression in Response to Injury

    M. J. Donovan;R. C. Miranda;R. Kraemer;T. A. McCaffrey

  • trkC, a receptor for neurotrophin-3, is widely expressed in the developing nervous system and in non-neuronal tissues

    Lino Tessarollo;Pantelis Tsoulfas;Dionisio Martin-Zanca;Debra J. Gilbert

  • Functional recovery in traumatic spinal cord injury after transplantation of multineurotrophin-expressing glial-restricted precursor cells.

    Qilin Cao;Xiao Ming Xu;William H. DeVries;Gaby U. Enzmann

  • Targeted deletion of all isoforms of the trkC gene suggests the use of alternate receptors by its ligand neurotrophin-3 in neuronal development and implicates trkC in normal cardiogenesis

    Lino Tessarollo;Pantelis Tsoulfas;Michael J. Donovan;Mary Ellen Palko

  • Three receptor-linked protein-tyrosine phosphatases are selectively expressed on central nervous system axons in the Drosophila embryo.

    Shin Shay Tian;Pantelis Tsoulfas;Kai Zinn

  • Single-cell analysis of the cellular heterogeneity and interactions in the injured mouse spinal cord.

    Lindsay M. Milich;James S. Choi;Christine Ryan;Susana R. Cerqueira

  • Neurotrophin-3 induced by tri-iodothyronine in cerebellar granule cells promotes Purkinje cell differentiation.

    D Lindholm;E Castrén;P Tsoulfas;R Kolbeck

  • An immunoglobulin-like domain determines the specificity of neurotrophin receptors.

    Roman Urfer;Pantelis Tsoulfas;Lori O'Connell;David L. Shelton

  • Hippocampal stem cells differentiate into excitatory and inhibitory neurons.

    Carlos Vicario-Abejón;Carlos Collin;Pantelis Tsoulfas;Ronald D. G. McKay

  • mGreenLantern: a bright monomeric fluorescent protein with rapid expression and cell filling properties for neuronal imaging.

    Benjamin C. Campbell;Elisa M. Nabel;Mitchell H. Murdock;Cristina Lao-Peregrin

  • Three-dimensional evaluation of retinal ganglion cell axon regeneration and pathfinding in whole mouse tissue after injury.

    Xueting Luo;Yadira Salgueiro;Samuel R. Beckerman;Vance P. Lemmon

  • Widespread cellular proliferation and focal neurogenesis after traumatic brain injury in the rat.

    Carlos Urrea;Daniel A Castellanos;Jacqueline Sagen;Pantelis Tsoulfas

  • The binding epitopes of neurotrophin-3 to its receptors trkC and gp75 and the design of a multifunctional human neurotrophin

    Roman Urfer;Pantelis Tsoulfas;Dan Soppet;Enrique Escandón

  • Absence of Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I on Neural Stem Cells Does Not Permit Natural Killer Cell Killing and Prevents Recognition by Alloreactive Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes In Vitro

    Michele Mammolenti;Shyam Gajavelli;Pantelis Tsoulfas;Robert Levy

  • TrkC Isoforms with Inserts in the Kinase Domain Show Impaired Signaling Responses

    Pantelis Tsoulfas;Robert M. Stephens;David R. Kaplan;Luis F. Parada

  • High Resolution Mapping of the Binding Site of TrkA for Nerve Growth Factor and TrkC for Neurotrophin-3 on the Second Immunoglobulin-like Domain of the Trk Receptors

    Roman Urfer;Pantelis Tsoulfas;Lori O'Connell;Jo Anne Hongo

  • Consequences of noggin expression by neural stem, glial, and neuronal precursor cells engrafted into the injured spinal cord.

    Gaby U. Enzmann;Richard L. Benton;John P. Woock;Russell M. Howard

Frequent Co-Authors

Luis F. Parada
Luis F. Parada Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Vance Lemmon
Vance Lemmon University of Miami
Scott R. Whittemore
Scott R. Whittemore University of Louisville
Lino Tessarollo
Lino Tessarollo National Institutes of Health
W. Dalton Dietrich
W. Dalton Dietrich University of Miami
Barbara L. Hempstead
Barbara L. Hempstead Cornell University
Peipei Ping
Peipei Ping University of California, Los Angeles
Mary Bartlett Bunge
Mary Bartlett Bunge University of Miami
David L. Kaplan
David L. Kaplan Tufts University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can open many doors for students interested in neuroscience and related fields. With the growing popularity of remote learning, students can now access a range of online college courses that offer flexibility and convenience alongside quality education.

Many students also look into specialized certifications or advanced programs to boost their employability. Obtaining certifications that pay well can provide a competitive edge in a variety of health and research professions. These certifications often complement neuroscience qualifications and increase job prospects in both clinical and non-clinical roles.

For those interested in mental health or social work, there are cheap online msw programs that provide an affordable pathway to meaningful careers in counseling, community outreach, or case management. Similarly, aspiring behavior analysts might pursue bcba masters programs online, which prepare graduates for high-demand roles in therapy and education.

By considering these online degree options and specialized pathways, students interested in neuroscience can find affordable, accessible, and lucrative routes toward their future careers.

Best Scientists Citing Pantelis Tsoulfas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles