World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Maya G. Kopylova publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maya G. Kopylova sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Maya G. Kopylova D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maya G. Kopylova sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Maya G. Kopylova is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada and has contributed extensively to the field of Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their research spans multiple subfields, primarily Geophysics, Artificial Intelligence, Geology, Mechanics of Materials, and Biomaterials.

The scientist's major research interests focus on various aspects of Geological and Geochemical Analysis, incorporating Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping. Other topics covered include High-pressure geophysics and materials, earthquake and tectonic studies, Geological Studies and Exploration, Clay minerals and soil interactions, and Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis.

Recent scholarly work reflects active involvement in several key subjects within these domains. Notable recent papers include:

  • Plume-driven recratonization of deep continental lithospheric mantle, 2021, published in Nature
  • Petrology of lamprophyre dykes in the Kola Alkaline Carbonatite Province (N Europe), 2021, Lithos
  • Constraining carbonation freezing and petrography of the carbonated cratonic mantle with natural samples, 2021, Lithos
  • The assimilation of felsic xenoliths in kimberlites: insights into temperature and volatiles during kimberlite emplacement, 2021, Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology
  • Origin of megacrysts by carbonate-bearing metasomatism: a case study for the Muskox kimberlite, Slave craton, Canada, 2021, Journal of the Geological Society

Kopylova collaborates regularly with several co-authors, including А. А. Носова, А. А. Vozniak, Л. В. Сазонова, Н. М. Лебедева, and N. M. Korolev, reflecting partnerships across multiple research projects.

Their publications most frequently appear in the following venues:

  • Lithos
  • Goldschmidt2021 abstracts
  • Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology
  • Mineralogy and Petrology
  • Chemical Geology

Best Publications

  • Carbonated peridotite xenoliths from Spitsbergen: implications for trace element signature of mantle carbonate metasomatism

    Dmitri A. Ionov;Dmitri A. Ionov;Dmitri A. Ionov;Claude Dupuy;Suzanne Y. O'Reilly;Maya G. Kopylova

  • Petrology of Peridotite and Pyroxenite Xenoliths from the Jericho Kimberlite: Implications for the Thermal State of the Mantle beneath the Slave Craton, Northern Canada

    M. G. Kopylova;J. K. Russell;H. Cookenboo

  • Primitive Magma From the Jericho Pipe, N.W.T., Canada: Constraints on Primary Kimberlite Melt Chemistry

    S. E. Price;J. K. Russell;M. G. Kopylova

  • Lower mantle diamonds from Rio Soriso (Juina area, Mato Grosso, Brazil)

    Patrick C. Hayman;Maya G. Kopylova;Felix V. Kaminsky

  • A redox profile of the Slave mantle and oxygen fugacity control in the cratonic mantle

    C. McCammon;M. G. Kopylova

  • Chemical stratification of cratonic lithosphere: constraints from the Northern Slave craton, Canada

    Maya G. Kopylova;James K. Russell

  • Searching for parental kimberlite melt

    M.G. Kopylova;S. Matveev;M. Raudsepp

  • Carbonate-bearing mantle peridotite xenoliths from Spitsbergen: phase relationships, mineral compositions and trace-element residence

    Dmitri A. Ionov;Suzanne Y. O'Reilly;Yuri S. Genshaft;Maya G. Kopylova

  • CaSiO 3 perovskite in diamond indicates the recycling of oceanic crust into the lower mantle

    F. Nestola;N. Korolev;M. Kopylova;N. Rotiroti

  • Mantle Xenoliths from the Southeastern Slave Craton: Evidence for Chemical Zonation in a Thick, Cold Lithosphere

    M. G. Kopylova;G. Caro

  • Origin of cratonic lithospheric mantle roots: A geochemical study of peridotites from the North Atlantic Craton, West Greenland

    N. Wittig;D.G. Pearson;M. Webb;C.J. Ottley

  • Crystallization of megacrysts from protokimberlitic fluids: Geochemical evidence from high-Cr megacrysts in the Jericho kimberlite

    M.G. Kopylova;G.M. Nowell;D.G. Pearson;G. Markovic

  • A Re–Os isotope and PGE study of kimberlite-derived peridotite xenoliths from Somerset Island and a comparison to the Slave and Kaapvaal cratons

    G. J. Irvine;D. G. Pearson;B. A. Kjarsgaard;R. W. Carlson

  • The origin of high-MgO diamond eclogites from the Jericho Kimberlite, Canada

    Katie A. Smart;Larry M. Heaman;Thomas Chacko;Antonio Simonetti

  • The development of lithospheric keels beneath the earliest continents : time constraints using PGE and Re–Os isotope systematics.

    D. G. Pearson;G. J. Irvine;R. W. Carlson;M. G. Kopylova

  • Diamonds and eclogites of the Jericho kimberlite (Northern Canada)

    Andrea De Stefano;M. G. Kopylova;P. Cartigny;V. Afanasiev

  • Mineral inclusions in diamonds from the River Ranch kimberlite, Zimbabwe

    Maya G. Kopylova;John J. Gurney;Leon R. M. Daniels

  • Plume-driven recratonization of deep continental lithospheric mantle.

    Jingao Liu;Jingao Liu;D. Graham Pearson;Lawrence Hongliang Wang;Kathy A. Mather

  • Heat production and heat flow in the mantle lithosphere, Slave craton, Canada

    James K. Russell;G.M. Dipple;M.G. Kopylova

  • Carbonatitic mineralogy of natural diamond-forming fluids

    M. Kopylova;O. Navon;L. Dubrovinsky;G. Khachatryan

  • Archean calc-alkaline lamprophyres of Wawa, Ontario, Canada: Unconventional diamondiferous volcaniclastic rocks

    Nathalie Lefebvre;Maya Kopylova;Kevin Kivi

  • A steady state conductive geotherm for the north central Slave, Canada: Inversion of petrological data from the Jericho Kimberlite pipe

    James K. Russell;Maya G. Kopylova

Frequent Co-Authors

James K. Russell
James K. Russell University of British Columbia
D.G. Pearson
D.G. Pearson University of Alberta
John J. Gurney
John J. Gurney University of Cape Town
Dmitri A. Ionov
Dmitri A. Ionov University of Montpellier
Fabrizio Nestola
Fabrizio Nestola University of Padua
Leonid Dubrovinsky
Leonid Dubrovinsky University of Bayreuth
Oded Navon
Oded Navon Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Suzanne Y. O'Reilly
Suzanne Y. O'Reilly Macquarie University
Richard W. Carlson
Richard W. Carlson Carnegie Institution for Science
Murli H. Manghnani
Murli H. Manghnani University of Hawaii at Manoa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths and the flexibility of online education. For professionals seeking to enhance their skills or shift careers, various programs cater to specific needs, such as military friendly online spanish degree programs that support veterans in gaining valuable language skills for environmental communication roles.

Creative professionals might explore environmental storytelling through programs like online mfa creative writing, which can enhance the communication of scientific research or advocacy projects focused on Earth sciences.

For those interested in organizational leadership within environmental agencies or companies, pursuing a masters degree in human resource management online can provide critical skills for managing teams and resources effectively.

Additionally, seniors looking to pivot or deepen their knowledge quickly can benefit from one year degrees for seniors, allowing for accelerated education without long-term commitments. These options combined highlight the versatility and accessibility of education aligned with Earth Science careers.

Best Scientists Citing Maya G. Kopylova

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles