World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Thomas Stachel

Thomas Stachel

Thomas Stachel publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Stachel sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Thomas Stachel D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Stachel sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas Stachel is a researcher primarily affiliated with the University of Alberta in Canada. Their work centers on Earth and Planetary Sciences, with significant contributions across related subfields including Geophysics, Materials Chemistry, Artificial Intelligence, Geochemistry and Petrology, and Geology.

The main topics explored by Thomas Stachel include Geological and Geochemical Analysis, High-pressure Geophysics and Materials, earthquake and tectonic studies, Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research, Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping, Geological Formations and Processes Exploration, and Geological Studies and Exploration.

Frequent publication venues for their research are:

  • Mineralogy and Petrology
  • Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
  • Earth and Planetary Science Letters
  • Borealis
  • Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry

Thomas Stachel has frequently collaborated with several other researchers in their field. Common coauthors include:

  • D. Graham Pearson
  • Richard A. Stern
  • Fabrizio Nestola
  • Matthew F. Hardman
  • Jeff W. Harris

Notable recent papers authored or coauthored by Thomas Stachel are:

  • Mineral Inclusions in Lithospheric Diamonds (2022), published in Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry
  • Carbon and Nitrogen in Mantle-Derived Diamonds (2022), published in Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry

Other significant papers associated with their collaborators include:

  • The lithospheric-to-lower-mantle carbon cycle recorded in superdeep diamonds (2020), Nature
  • Deep carbon through time: Earth's diamond record and its implications for carbon cycling and fluid speciation in the mantle (2020), Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
  • Sublithospheric diamond ages and the supercontinent cycle (2023), Nature

Their research contributions focus on understanding the formation and properties of diamonds, carbon cycling in the Earth's interior, and the geological processes influencing deep Earth materials. This work intersects fields such as geophysics and materials chemistry within a geological context.

Best Publications

  • The origin of cratonic diamonds — Constraints from mineral inclusions

    T. Stachel;J.W. Harris

  • Kankan diamonds (Guinea) II: lower mantle inclusion parageneses

    Thomas Stachel;Jeff W. Harris;Gerhard P. Brey;Werner Joswig

  • The trace element composition of silicate inclusions in diamonds: a review

    Thomas Stachel;Sonja Aulbach;Gerhard P. Brey;Jeff W. Harris

  • Diamond formation — Where, when and how?

    T. Stachel;R.W. Luth

  • Inclusions in sublithospheric diamonds: Glimpses of deep Earth

    Thomas Stachel;Gerhard P. Brey;Jeffrey W. Harris

  • Metasomatic processes in lherzolitic and harzburgitic domains of diamondiferous lithospheric mantle: REE in garnets from xenoliths and inclusions in diamonds

    Thomas Stachel;K.Stephanus Viljoen;Gerhard Brey;Jeff W Harris

  • Rare and unusual mineral inclusions in diamonds from Mwadui, Tanzania

    Thomas Stachel;Jeff W. Harris;Gerhard P. Brey

  • Kankan diamonds (Guinea) I: from the lithosphere down to the transition zone

    Thomas Stachel;Gerhard P. Brey;Jeff W. Harris

  • Diamonds from the asthenosphere and the transition zone

    Thomas Stachel

  • Oxidation of the Kaapvaal lithospheric mantle driven by metasomatism

    Steven Creighton;Thomas Stachel;Sergei Matveev;Heidi Höfer

  • Diamond precipitation and mantle metasomatism - evidence from the trace element chemistry of silicate inclusions in diamonds from Akwatia, Ghana

    Thomas Stachel;Jeff W. Harris

  • Sources of carbon in inclusion bearing diamonds

    Thomas Stachel;Jeff W. Harris;Karlis Muehlenbachs

  • NEW CA-SILICATE INCLUSIONS IN DIAMONDS : TRACERS FROM THE LOWER MANTLE

    Werner Joswig;Thomas Stachel;Jeff W. Harris;Werner H. Baur

  • Formation of diamond in the Earth's mantle.

    Thomas Stachel;Jeff W Harris

  • The chlorine isotope composition of chondrites and Earth

    Z.D. Sharp;J.A. Mercer;R.H. Jones;A.J. Brearley

  • Diamonds from Jagersfontein (South Africa): messengers from the sublithospheric mantle

    Ralf Tappert;Thomas Stachel;Jeff W. Harris;Karlis Muehlenbachs

  • Subducting oceanic crust: The source of deep diamonds

    Ralf Tappert;Thomas Stachel;Jeff W. Harris;Karlis Muehlenbachs

  • Syngenetic inclusions in diamond from the Birim field (Ghana) – a deep peridotitic profile with a history of depletion and re-enrichment

    T. Stachel;Jeffrey W. Harris

  • Detection of a Ca-rich lithology in the Earth's deep (>300 km) convecting mantle

    Frank E. Brenker;Laszlo Vincze;Bart Vekemans;Lutz Nasdala

  • Diamond growth from oxidized carbon sources beneath the Northern Slave Craton, Canada: A δ13C–N study of eclogite-hosted diamonds from the Jericho kimberlite

    Katie A. Smart;Thomas Chacko;Thomas Stachel;Karlis Muehlenbachs

  • Eclogitic and websteritic diamond sources beneath the Limpopo Belt - is slab-melting the link?

    Sonja Aulbach;Thomas Stachel;Stephanus K. Viljoen;Gerhard P. Brey

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeff W. Harris
Jeff W. Harris University of Glasgow
Richard A. Stern
Richard A. Stern University of Alberta
Sonja Aulbach
Sonja Aulbach Goethe University Frankfurt
D.G. Pearson
D.G. Pearson University of Alberta
Gerhard P. Brey
Gerhard P. Brey Goethe University Frankfurt
Karlis Muehlenbachs
Karlis Muehlenbachs University of Alberta
Robert W. Luth
Robert W. Luth University of Alberta
Larry M. Heaman
Larry M. Heaman University of Alberta
Robert A. Creaser
Robert A. Creaser University of Alberta
Steven B. Shirey
Steven B. Shirey Carnegie Institution for Science

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science opens various career opportunities, but diversifying your skillset through complementary online degrees can enhance your prospects. For example, veterans interested in expanding their education might consider programs like a spanish degree online for veterans, which can offer language skills beneficial in global environmental research or consulting roles.

Creative professionals aiming to integrate artistic perspectives into scientific communication might explore an mfa degree online. This pathway supports careers blending Earth Science with art, such as scientific illustration or environmental storytelling.

Those interested in leadership and organizational roles within environmental firms or agencies can pursue management-focused qualifications. The best online human resource management masters degree prepares graduates to handle workforce planning and development in science-driven industries.

Additionally, seniors or professionals seeking quick upskilling may find one year degree programs for seniors highly practical. These accelerated options enable learners to swiftly gain relevant credentials without long-term commitment.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Stachel

Trending Scientists