World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Robert W. Luth

Robert W. Luth

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 36 7355 6808 380 347 90 4169

Robert W. Luth publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Robert W. Luth between 1981 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Robert W. Luth published across 46 years, from 1981 to 2026, averaging 2.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 1993. 2 of the 105 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 1993. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 4 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 7 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 3 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 3 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 0 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 1 publication 2026: 1 publication
1981 2026

105 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Robert W. Luth: publications per year, 1981 to 2026
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 1
1987 2
1988 3
1989 2
1990 1
1991 2
1992 0
1993 7
1994 2
1995 5
1996 1
1997 1
1998 0
1999 1
2000 4
2001 4
2002 3
2003 6
2004 3
2005 1
2006 7
2007 2
2008 4
2009 5
2010 2
2011 3
2012 2
2013 1
2014 3
2015 1
2016 3
2017 5
2018 2
2019 4
2020 1
2021 0
2022 2
2023 2
2024 4
2025 1
2026 1
Total 105
Download as CSV

Robert W. Luth publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert W. Luth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 88–97 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 90 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376 90
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Robert W. Luth D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert W. Luth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389 36
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Robert W. Luth is affiliated with the University of Alberta in Canada and focuses research primarily within the field of Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their work extensively covers geophysics alongside related subfields such as geological and geochemical analysis, materials chemistry, and education.

The scientist's publication record includes contributions to both research articles and reviews. Among recent notable works are:

  • The lithospheric-to-lower-mantle carbon cycle recorded in superdeep diamonds, 2020, published in Nature
  • Experimental Petrology Applied to Natural Diamond Growth, 2022, published in Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry
  • Extreme redox variations in a superdeep diamond from a subducted slab, 2023, published in Nature
  • Sublithospheric diamonds extend Paleoproterozoic record of cold deep subduction into the lower mantle, 2024, published in Earth and Planetary Science Letters
  • Dense hydrated Mg-silicates in diamond: Implications for transport of H 2O into the mantle, 2024, published in Science Advances

Robert W. Luth's research contributes to several main topics, including:

  • Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • High-pressure geophysics and materials
  • Earthquake and tectonic studies
  • Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
  • Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Higher Education Governance and Development
  • Online and Blended Learning

Frequent coauthors in their work include:

  • D. Graham Pearson
  • Thomas Stachel
  • Richard A. Stern
  • Fabrizio Nestola
  • Margo E. Regier

Publication venues where Robert W. Luth most often publishes their work include:

  • Nature
  • Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry
  • Earth and Planetary Science Letters
  • Science Advances
  • Teaching in Higher Education

The subfields identified in their research portfolio are:

  • Geophysics
  • Education
  • Materials Chemistry
  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Geochemistry and Petrology

Robert W. Luth's published works reflect an interdisciplinary approach, linking advanced experimental petrology with geological processes operating in Earth's deep interior. Their research interests also extend into educational domains, with contributions addressing the evaluation of teaching and higher education governance.

Best Publications

  • Experimental data on the speciation of sulfur as a function of oxygen fugacity in basaltic melts

    Pedro J. Jugo;Robert W. Luth;Jeremy P. Richards

  • An Experimental Study of the Sulfur Content in Basaltic Melts Saturated with Immiscible Sulfide or Sulfate Liquids at 1300°C and 1·0 GPa

    Pedro J. Jugo;Robert W. Luth;Jeremy P. Richards

  • Diamond formation — Where, when and how?

    T. Stachel;R.W. Luth

  • Ferric iron in mantle-derived garnets

    Robert W. Luth;David Virgo;Francis R. Boyd;Bernard J. Wood

  • Oxidation of the Kaapvaal lithospheric mantle driven by metasomatism

    Steven Creighton;Thomas Stachel;Sergei Matveev;Heidi Höfer

  • Experimental study of the system phlogopite-diopside from 3.5 to 17 GPa

    Robert W. Luth

  • Diamonds, Eclogites, and the Oxidation State of the Earth's Mantle.

    Robert W. Luth

  • The graphite-COH fluid equilibrium in P, T, \(f_{O_2 } \) space

    Peter Ulmer;Robert W. Luth

  • Characterizing experimental pressure and temperature conditions in multi-anvil apparatus

    M. J. Walter;Y. Thibault;K. Wei;R. W. Luth

  • Experiments on CaCO3-MgCO3 solid solutions at high pressure and temperature

    Alessandra Buob;Robert W. Luth;Max W. Schmidt;Peter Ulmer

  • Experimental determination of the reaction aragonite + magnesite = dolomite at 5 to 9 GPa

    Robert W. Luth

  • The buffering capacity of lithospheric mantle: implications for diamond formation

    Robert W. Luth;Thomas Stachel

  • Powder X-Ray Diffraction Analysis of Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Sedimentary Dolostones

    Brian Jones;Robert W. Luth;Alexander J. MacNeil

  • Raman spectroscopic study of the solubility mechanisms of F in glasses in the system CaO-CaF2 -SiO2

    Robert W. Luth

  • Oxidation state of the lithospheric mantle beneath Diavik diamond mine, central Slave craton, NWT, Canada

    Steven Creighton;Steven Creighton;Thomas Stachel;Dave Eichenberg;Robert W. Luth

  • Ferric iron in mantle-derived pyroxenes and a new oxybarometer for the mantle

    Robert W. Luth;Dante Canil

  • The evolution of calcite-bearing kimberlites by melt-rock reaction: evidence from polymineralic inclusions within clinopyroxene and garnet megacrysts from Lac de Gras kimberlites, Canada

    Y. Bussweiler;R. S. Stone;D. G. Pearson;R. W. Luth

  • IS PHASE A RELEVANT TO THE EARTH'S MANTLE?

    Robert W. Luth

  • Orthopyroxene survival in deep carbonatite melts: implications for kimberlites

    Rebecca S. Stone;Robert W. Luth

  • Carbonation and decarbonation of eclogites: the role of garnet

    Ruth Knoche;Russel J. Sweeney;Robert W. Luth

  • Effect of fluorine on the viscosity of diopside liquid

    Donald B. Dingwell

  • Constraints on the oxidation state of the mantle: An electrochemical and 57Fe Mössbauer study of mantle-derived ilmenites

    David Virgo;Robert W. Luth;Mark A. Moats;Gene C. Ulmer

  • Dolostones from Grand Cayman, British West Indies

    Brian Jones;Robert W. Luth

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas Stachel
Thomas Stachel University of Alberta
Brian Jones
Brian Jones University of Alberta
Richard A. Stern
Richard A. Stern University of Alberta
Jeremy P. Richards
Jeremy P. Richards Laurentian University
David Virgo
David Virgo Carnegie Institution of Washington
D.G. Pearson
D.G. Pearson University of Alberta
Robert A. Creaser
Robert A. Creaser University of Alberta
Michael J. Walter
Michael J. Walter Carnegie Institution for Science
Thomas Chacko
Thomas Chacko University of Alberta
Steven D. Jacobsen
Steven D. Jacobsen Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science opens the door to numerous career opportunities, but complementing your knowledge with related degrees can enhance your prospects even further. For instance, professionals interested in managing teams or organizational development may consider pursuing a masters degree in human resource management online. This can be particularly useful for those aiming to lead within scientific organizations or environmental consultancies.

Earth Science also attracts learners of all ages, including older adults who seek flexible learning options. If you are exploring educational opportunities later in life, reviewing the best college degrees for seniors can help identify programs that fit your lifestyle and career goals, making continuing education both accessible and rewarding.

Another complementary pathway involves library and information sciences, which support the organization and dissemination of scientific research. Those fascinated by this field should explore ala accredited mls programs to find reputable online options that align with career goals in data curation or archival roles.

Deciding whether is library science a good degree depends on your interest in managing knowledge and information systems. For Earth Science professionals, this degree can offer unique skills applicable to research institutions, environmental databases, and academic libraries.

Best Scientists Citing Robert W. Luth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles