World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
62
Citations
9759
World Ranking
3283
National Ranking
1847

Joseph W. LaBrie publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph W. LaBrie sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 199 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Joseph W. LaBrie D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph W. LaBrie sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1963 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Joseph W. LaBrie is affiliated with Loyola Marymount University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine, Psychology, and Social Sciences, with a significant focus on Epidemiology, Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, and General Health Professions.

Their scholarly work addresses key topics including Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes, Behavioral Health and Interventions, the Impact of Technology on Adolescents, Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy, Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology, and Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health.

Frequent venues for Joseph W. LaBrie's publications include Addictive Behaviors, Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, Substance Use & Misuse, Journal of American College Health, and Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity.

Notable recent papers by Joseph W. LaBrie are:

  • "An examination of the prospective associations between objectively assessed exposure to alcohol-related Instagram content, alcohol-specific cognitions, and first-year college drinking" (2021), published in Addictive Behaviors
  • "Normative substance use antecedents among sexual minorities: A scoping review and synthesis." (2020), published in Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity
  • "Systematic Bias in Self-Reported Social Media Use in the Age of Platform Swinging: Implications for Studying Social Media Use in Relation to Adolescent Health Behavior" (2022), published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • "Injunctive and descriptive normative feedback for college drinking prevention: Is the whole greater than the sum of its parts?" (2022), published in Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
  • "Oral contraceptive use, bone mineral density, and bone turnover markers over 12 months in college-aged females" (2020), published in Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism

Frequent co-authors working with Joseph W. LaBrie include:

  • Sarah C. Boyle
  • Bradley M. Trager
  • Reed M. Morgan
  • Rob Turrisi
  • Eric R. Pedersen

Joseph W. LaBrie's contributions have been recognized through awards such as the Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), awarded in 1963.

Best Publications

  • Group Identification as a Moderator of the Relationship Between Perceived Social Norms and Alcohol Consumption

    Clayton Neighbors;Joseph W. LaBrie;Justin F. Hummer;Melissa A. Lewis

  • Measuring alcohol-related protective behavioral strategies among college students: further examination of the Protective Behavioral Strategies Scale.

    Matthew P. Martens;Eric R. Pederson;Joseph W. LaBrie;Amanda G. Ferrier

  • Different digital paths to the keg? How exposure to peers' alcohol-related social media content influences drinking among male and female first-year college students

    Sarah C. Boyle;Joseph W. LaBrie;Nicole M. Froidevaux;Yong D. Witkovic

  • An application of the Theory of Planned Behavior to sorority alcohol consumption.

    Karen K. Huchting;Andrew Lac;Joseph W. LaBrie

  • Protective behavioral strategies mediate the effect of drinking motives on alcohol use among heavy drinking college students: Gender and race differences

    Joseph W. LaBrie;Andrew Lac;Shannon R. Kenney;Tehniat Mirza

  • Sexual risk behaviors and alcohol: Higher base rates revealed using the unmatched‐count technique

    Joseph W. LaBrie;Mitchell Earleywine

  • Partying before the party: examining prepartying behavior among college students.

    Eric R. Pedersen;Joseph W. LaBrie

  • Reasons for drinking in the college student context: the differential role and risk of the social motivator.

    Joseph W. LaBrie;Justin F. Hummer;Eric R. Pedersen

  • Whose opinion matters? The relationship between injunctive norms and alcohol consequences in college students

    Joseph W. LaBrie;Justin F. Hummer;Clayton Neighbors;Mary E. Larimer

  • Effects of alcohol, expectancies, and partner type on condom use in college males: Event‐level analyses

    Joseph LaBrie;Mitch Earleywine;Jason Schiffman;Eric Pedersen

  • Global sleep quality as a moderator of alcohol consumption and consequences in college students.

    Shannon R. Kenney;Joseph W. LaBrie;Justin F. Hummer;Andy T. Pham

  • Hooking Up in the College Context: The Event-Level Effects of Alcohol Use and Partner Familiarity on Hookup Behaviors and Contentment

    Joseph W. LaBrie;Justin F. Hummer;Tehniat M. Ghaidarov;Andrew Lac

  • Performance of alcohol and safer sex change rulers compared with readiness to change questionnaires.

    Joseph W. LaBrie;Thomas Quinlan;Jason E. Schiffman;Mitchell E. Earleywine

  • RCT of web-based personalized normative feedback for college drinking prevention: are typical student norms good enough?

    Joseph W. Labrie;Melissa Ardelle Lewis;David C. Atkins;Clayton Neighbors

  • Live interactive group-specific normative feedback reduces misperceptions and drinking in college students: a randomized cluster trial.

    Joseph W. LaBrie;Justin F. Hummer;Clayton Neighbors;Eric R. Pedersen

  • Mental Health, Sleep Quality, Drinking Motives, and Alcohol-Related Consequences: A Path-Analytic Model

    Shannon R. Kenney;Andrew Lac;Joseph W. LaBrie;Justin F. Hummer

  • Identifying Factors That Increase the Likelihood for Alcohol-Induced Blackouts in the Prepartying Context

    Joseph W. LaBrie;Justin F. Hummer;Shannon Kenney;Andrew Lac

  • Descriptive Drinking Norms: For Whom Does Reference Group Matter?*

    Mary E. Larimer;Clayton Neighbors;Joseph W. LaBrie;David C. Atkins

  • Minor physical anomalies and schizophrenia spectrum disorders: a prospective investigation.

    Jason Schiffman;Morten Ekstrøm;Joseph LaBrie;Fini Schulsinger

  • A brief Rutgers Alcohol Problem Index with less potential for bias

    Mitch Earleywine;Joseph W. LaBrie;Eric R. Pedersen

Frequent Co-Authors

Justin F. Hummer
Justin F. Hummer RAND Corporation
Eric R. Pedersen
Eric R. Pedersen University of Southern California
Andrew Lac
Andrew Lac University of Colorado Colorado Springs
Shannon R. Kenney
Shannon R. Kenney Brown University
Clayton Neighbors
Clayton Neighbors University of Houston
Jason Schiffman
Jason Schiffman University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Mary E. Larimer
Mary E. Larimer University of Washington
Christine M. Lee
Christine M. Lee University of Washington
Melissa A. Lewis
Melissa A. Lewis University of North Texas Health Science Center
David C. Atkins
David C. Atkins University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring an education in psychology opens the door to a variety of specialized online degrees and career pathways. Many students choose to pursue advanced credentials, like becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), especially if they are passionate about applied behavior analysis or therapy-related work.

The journey to becoming a BCBA involves meeting strict educational and certification requirements that can vary by location. For example, those interested in working in Ohio should familiarize themselves with the Toledo bcba education requirements. Similarly, if you’re planning to build your career in Arizona, it is important to review the bcba certification requirements in Tucson.

Aspiring BCBAs in Oklahoma can learn more about the steps involved by reading about how to become a bcba in Tulsa. For those looking to work on the East Coast, make sure you understand the Virginia Beach bcba requirements for certification.

Online degrees in psychology and behavior analysis not only offer flexibility but also help candidates meet the prerequisites for these specialized credentials. Be sure to review local requirements before beginning your educational journey.

Best Scientists Citing Joseph W. LaBrie

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles