World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 34 10125 9475 5340 4875 122 5972

Lindsay S. Ham publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lindsay S. Ham between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lindsay S. Ham published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 6.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2011. 21 of the 149 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2011. 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 11 publications
2002 2025

149 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lindsay S. Ham: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 2
2003 3
2004 2
2005 5
2006 1
2007 3
2008 4
2009 7
2010 8
2011 14
2012 5
2013 10
2014 5
2015 7
2016 8
2017 4
2018 6
2019 6
2020 4
2021 9
2022 5
2023 10
2024 10
2025 11
Total 149
Download as CSV

Lindsay S. Ham publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lindsay S. Ham sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 122 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 122
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Lindsay S. Ham D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lindsay S. Ham sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 34
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Lindsay S. Ham is affiliated with the University of Arkansas at Fayetteville in the United States. Their research spans primarily within the social sciences and psychology, with a focus on subfields including epidemiology, gender studies, sociology and political science, clinical psychology, and applied psychology.

The main topics addressed in Ham's work include:

  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Sex work and related issues
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Intimate Partner and Family Violence

Ham has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Byron L. Zamboanga
  • Amie R. Newins
  • Kristen N. Jozkowski
  • P. Priscilla Lui
  • Kayla Ford

Their research has been published repeatedly in specific academic journals and venues, notably:

  • Substance Use & Misuse
  • Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs
  • Emerging Adulthood
  • Journal of American College Health
  • Violence Against Women

Notable recent publications by Lindsay S. Ham include:

  • "Mental Health Risk Profiles and Related Substance Use During Coronavirus Pandemic Among College Students Who Use Substances," 2022, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
  • "Alcohol intoxication impairs the bystander intervention process in a hypothetical sexual assault: A field investigation," 2020, Psychology of Violence
  • "Social Connectedness and Negative Emotion Modulation: Social Media Use for Coping Among College Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic," 2023, Emerging Adulthood
  • "The Effects of Alcohol Intoxication on Perceptions of Consent and Refusal Indicators in a Fictional Alcohol-Involved Sexual Encounter," 2023, The Journal of Sex Research
  • "The role of personal identity as a resource for college students during COVID-19," 2023, Journal of American College Health

Best Publications

  • College students and problematic drinking: A review of the literature

    Lindsay S Ham;Debra A Hope

  • Examining the Light and Dark Sides of Emerging Adults’ Identity: A Study of Identity Status Differences in Positive and Negative Psychosocial Functioning

    Seth J. Schwartz;Wim Beyers;Koen Luyckx;Bart Soenens

  • The relationship between social anxiety disorder and alcohol use disorders: A critical review

    Eric P. Morris;Sherry H. Stewart;Lindsay S. Ham

  • Dimensions of acculturation: associations with health risk behaviors among college students from immigrant families.

    Seth J. Schwartz;Robert S. Weisskirch;Byron L. Zamboanga;Linda G. Castillo

  • Psychometric assessment of the comprehensive effects of alcohol questionnaire: Comparing a brief version to the original full scale

    Lindsay S. Ham;Sherry H. Stewart;Peter J. Norton;Debra A. Hope

  • The role of drinking motives in social anxiety and alcohol use.

    Lindsay S. Ham;Michel Bonin;Debra A. Hope

  • Incorporating social anxiety into a model of college student problematic drinking

    Lindsay S. Ham;Debra A. Hope

  • Drinking motives as mediators of social anxiety and hazardous drinking among college students.

    Lindsay S Ham;Byron L Zamboanga;Amy K Bacon;Tracey A Garcia

  • Alcohol Expectancies, Pregaming, Drinking Games, and Hazardous Alcohol Use in a Multiethnic Sample of College Students

    Byron L. Zamboanga;Seth J. Schwartz;Lindsay S. Ham;Brian Borsari;Brian Borsari

  • Alcohol use motives among traumatic event-exposed, treatment-seeking adolescents: Associations with posttraumatic stress

    Laura J. Dixon;Ellen W. Leen-Feldner;Lindsay S. Ham;Matthew T. Feldner

  • Social anxiety and motives for alcohol use among adolescents.

    Heidemarie Blumenthal;Ellen W. Leen-Feldner;Jamie L. Frala;Christal L. Badour

  • Identity dimensions and related processes in emerging adulthood: helpful or harmful?

    Rachel A. Ritchie;Alan Meca;Vanessa L. Madrazo;Seth J. Schwartz

  • Incorporating social anxiety into a model of college problem drinking: replication and extension.

    Lindsay S. Ham;Debra A. Hope

  • Not Just Fun and Games: A Review of College Drinking Games Research From 2004 to 2013

    Byron L. Zamboanga;Janine V. Olthuis;Shannon R. Kenney;Christopher J. Correia

  • Intoxicated Eyewitnesses: Better than Their Reputation?

    Nadja Schreiber Compo;Jacqueline R. Evans;Rolando N. Carol;Daniella Villalba

  • The Association of Well-Being with Health Risk Behaviors in College-Attending Young Adults

    Seth J. Schwartz;Alan S. Waterman;Alexander T. Vazsonyi;Byron L. Zamboanga

  • Alcohol intoxication and memory for events: a snapshot of alcohol myopia in a real-world drinking scenario.

    Nadja Schreiber Compo;Jacqueline R Evans;Rolando N Carol;Daniel Kemp

  • Alcohol outcome expectancies and drinking to cope with social situations

    Maureen H. Carrigan;Lindsay S. Ham;Suzanne E. Thomas;Carrie L. Randall

  • Strength in Numbers? Cognitive Reappraisal Tendencies and Psychological Functioning Among Latinos in the Context of Oppression

    José A. Soto;Brian E. Armenta;Christopher R. Perez;Byron L. Zamboanga

  • No fear, just relax and play: social anxiety, alcohol expectancies, and drinking games among college students

    Lindsay S. Ham;Byron L. Zamboanga;Janine V. Olthuis;Hilary G. Casner

Frequent Co-Authors

Byron L. Zamboanga
Byron L. Zamboanga University of Arkansas at Fayetteville
Seth J. Schwartz
Seth J. Schwartz The University of Texas at Austin
Brian Borsari
Brian Borsari University of California, San Francisco
Debra A. Hope
Debra A. Hope University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Susan Krauss Whitbourne
Susan Krauss Whitbourne University of Massachusetts Amherst
Robert S. Weisskirch
Robert S. Weisskirch California State University, Monterey Bay
Sam A. Hardy
Sam A. Hardy Brigham Young University
Shannon R. Kenney
Shannon R. Kenney Brown University
Melissa M. Norberg
Melissa M. Norberg Macquarie University
Miguel Ángel Cano
Miguel Ángel Cano The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens doors to a variety of online programs and diverse career paths. One important consideration for many students is understanding the differences between major fields—for example, therapy vs counseling. Each has unique educational requirements and job responsibilities, so it’s worthwhile to think about which path aligns best with your interests and goals.

The field is evolving quickly. In fact, new trends reveal what is the fastest growing field in psychology—something to keep in mind as you select a specialty. Careers in forensic psychology are also gaining popularity, and many wonder, is forensic psychology a growing field? Job growth and variation make psychology a dynamic area to pursue, whether you’re considering private practice, research, or work within the legal system.

Beyond career interests, financial outcomes are another key issue. If you’re curious about earning potential in the field, research the average counseling psychology salary and compare roles that fit your needs. These insights can help you make informed decisions about which online psychology degree and career pathway best matches your aspirations.

Best Scientists Citing Lindsay S. Ham

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles