World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
48
Citations
9023
World Ranking
4217
National Ranking
330

Bradley James Pusey publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bradley James Pusey sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 124 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Bradley James Pusey D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bradley James Pusey sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bradley James Pusey is affiliated with the University of Western Australia in Australia and works primarily in the field of Environmental Science. Their research focuses extensively on areas such as Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Aquatic Science, Global and Planetary Change, and Environmental Chemistry.

The scientist's work addresses various topics including Fish Ecology and Management Studies, Fish Biology and Ecology Studies, Fish biology, ecology, and behavior in general, Marine and fisheries research, Isotope Analysis in Ecology, Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes, and Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology.

Bradley James Pusey has contributed to the publication of several papers. Some of the recent ones include:

  • Connectivity, habitat, and flow regime influence fish assemblage structure: Implications for environmental water management in a perennial river of the wet-dry tropics of northern Australia, 2020, Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
  • Water velocity and groundwater upwelling influence benthic algal biomass in a sandy tropical river: implications for water-resource development, 2020, Hydrobiologia
  • Effects of adoption of freshwater residency on life-history ecology of terapontid grunters, 2020, Freshwater Biology
  • New insights into the food web of an Australian tropical river to inform water resource management, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Drivers of zooplankton dynamics in a small tropical lowland river, 2020, Marine and Freshwater Research

The scientist frequently publishes in these venues:

  • Marine and Freshwater Research
  • Freshwater Biology
  • Scientific Reports
  • Hydrobiologia
  • Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems

Bradley James Pusey's collaborations include working alongside coauthors such as Michael M. Douglas, Leah Beesley, Mark J. Kennard, Chris S. Keogh, and Samantha A. Setterfield, reflecting a pattern of cooperative research efforts.

Best Publications

  • Importance of the riparian zone to the conservation and management of freshwater fish: a review

    Bradley James Pusey;Angela Arthington

  • Freshwater Fishes of North-Eastern Australia

    Bradley James Pusey;Mark James Kennard;Angela Arthington

  • Classification of natural flow regimes in Australia to support environmental flow management

    Mark James Kennard;Mark James Kennard;Bradley James Pusey;Bradley James Pusey;Julian D. Olden;Stephen John Mackay

  • Flow restoration and protection in Australian rivers

    Angela Arthington;Bradley James Pusey

  • A framework for hydrologic classification with a review of methodologies and applications in ecohydrology

    Julian D. Olden;Mark James Kennard;Bradley James Pusey

  • Are alien fish a reliable indicator of river health

    Mark James Kennard;Angela Arthington;Bradley James Pusey;B.D. Harch

  • Quantifying uncertainty in estimation of hydrologic metrics for ecohydrological studies

    Mark James Kennard;Mark James Kennard;Stephen John Mackay;Bradley James Pusey;Bradley James Pusey;Julian D. Olden

  • Climate change and its implications for Australia's freshwater fish

    John R. Morrongiello;John R. Morrongiello;John R. Morrongiello;Stephen J. Beatty;James C. Bennett;James C. Bennett;David A. Crook;David A. Crook

  • Species invasions and the changing biogeography of Australian freshwater fishes

    Julian D. Olden;Mark James Kennard;Bradley James Pusey

  • Spatial and temporal variation in fish assemblage structure in the Mary River, south-eastern Queensland: the influence of habitat structure

    Bradley J. Pusey;Angela H. Arthington;Martin G. Read

  • Gut content and stable isotope analyses provide complementary understanding of ontogenetic dietary shifts and trophic relationships among fishes in a tropical river

    Aaron M. Davis;Melanie L. Blanchette;Bradley J. Pusey;Timothy Jardine

  • Fish mediate high food web connectivity in the lower reaches of a tropical floodplain river.

    Timothy Jardine;Bradley James Pusey;Stephen Kimber Hamilton;Neil E. Pettit

  • The ‘wet–dry’ in the wet–dry tropics drives river ecosystem structure and processes in northern Australia

    D. M. Warfe;N. E. Pettit;P.M. Davies;Bradley James Pusey

  • Environmental flow requirements of fish in Lesotho rivers using the DRIFT methodology

    Angela Arthington;Johan L. Rall;Mark James Kennard;Bradley James Pusey

  • Multiscale effects of flow regime and habitat and their interaction on fish assemblage structure in eastern Australia

    Mark James Kennard;Julian D. Olden;Angela Arthington;Bradley James Pusey

  • Bayesian network models for environmental flow decision making in the Daly River, Northern Territory, Australia

    Terence U. Chan;Barry T. Hart;Mark James Kennard;Bradley James Pusey

  • Discharge variability and the development of predictive models relating stream fish assemblage structure to habitat in northeastern Australia

    Bradley James Pusey;Mark James Kennard;Angela Arthington

  • Dry season habitat use of fishes in an Australian tropical river

    K. Keller;Q. Allsop;J. Brim Box;D. Buckle

  • Development and Application of a Predictive Model of Freshwater Fish Assemblage Composition to Evaluate River Health in Eastern Australia

    Mark James Kennard;Bradley James Pusey;Angela Arthington;B.D. Harch

  • Species Richness and Geographical Variation in Assemblage Structure of the Freshwater Fish Fauna of the Wet Tropics Region of Northern Queensland

    BJ Pusey;MJ Kennard

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark J. Kennard
Mark J. Kennard Griffith University
Angela Arthington
Angela Arthington Griffith University
Michael M. Douglas
Michael M. Douglas University of Western Australia
Richard G. Pearson
Richard G. Pearson James Cook University
Stuart E. Bunn
Stuart E. Bunn Griffith University
Timothy D. Jardine
Timothy D. Jardine University of Saskatchewan
Neil E. Pettit
Neil E. Pettit University of Western Australia
Julian D. Olden
Julian D. Olden University of Washington
David L. Morgan
David L. Morgan Murdoch University
Peter J. Unmack
Peter J. Unmack University of Canberra

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers connected to Ecology and Evolution often leads students to consider various online degree pathways in health, science, and research. Fast-track programs are in high demand, as they offer quicker routes to advanced roles. For instance, understanding how to become a np is valuable for those interested in bridging health and biological sciences.

For registered nurses looking to advance, options like rn to bsn in 6 months provide accelerated learning. These programs help professionals upskill quickly and enter new scientific or healthcare leadership roles. Similarly, adn to np programs are designed for those holding an associate degree in nursing and aiming to become nurse practitioners, often integrating research and ecological health topics.

Additionally, online direct entry msn programs for those without a nursing background enable entry into advanced practice or research-oriented careers—an attractive option for science graduates. These flexible, efficient online programs serve as valuable bridges for anyone looking to align their ecological and evolutionary interests with impactful health science careers.

Best Scientists Citing Bradley James Pusey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles