World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mark J. Kennard

Mark J. Kennard

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
52
Citations
10280
World Ranking
3458
National Ranking
270

Mark J. Kennard publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark J. Kennard sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 193 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Mark J. Kennard D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark J. Kennard sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark J. Kennard is affiliated with Griffith University in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with a considerable emphasis on nature and landscape conservation as well as ecology. Their work extends to water science and technology, global and planetary change, and aquatic science.

Their research topics encompass various aspects of fish ecology and management studies, fish biology and ecology studies, hydrology and sediment transport processes, fish biology, ecology, and behavior, hydrology and watershed management studies, aquatic invertebrate ecology and behavior, and geophysics and gravity measurements.

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Mark J. Kennard include:

  • The conservation impacts of ecological disturbance: Time-bound estimates of population loss and recovery for fauna affected by the 2019-2020 Australian megafires, 2022, Global Ecology and Biogeography
  • Rapid assessment of the biodiversity impacts of the 2019-2020 Australian megafires to guide urgent management intervention and recovery and lessons for other regions, 2021, Diversity and Distributions
  • Big trouble for little fish: identifying Australian freshwater fishes in imminent risk of extinction, 2020, Pacific Conservation Biology
  • A national-scale dataset for threats impacting Australia's imperiled flora and fauna, 2021, Ecology and Evolution
  • Human disturbance and long-term changes in fish taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic diversity in the Yellow River, China, 2020, Hydrobiologia

Mark J. Kennard frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Gavin L. Butler
  • Luke Carpenter-Bundhoo
  • Michael M. Douglas
  • Mark Lintermans
  • Christopher E. Ndehedehe

Their research has been published extensively in journals such as:

  • Scientific Reports
  • Freshwater Biology
  • Marine and Freshwater Research
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Biological Conservation

Best Publications

  • Freshwater Fishes of North-Eastern Australia

    Bradley James Pusey;Mark James Kennard;Angela Arthington

  • Classification of natural flow regimes in Australia to support environmental flow management

    Mark James Kennard;Mark James Kennard;Bradley James Pusey;Bradley James Pusey;Julian D. Olden;Stephen John Mackay

  • Measuring benefits of protected area management: trends across realms and research gaps for freshwater systems.

    Vanessa M. Adams;Samantha A. Setterfield;Michael M. Douglas;Mark J. Kennard

  • Conservation biogeography of freshwater fishes: recent progress and future challenges

    Julian D. Olden;Mark James Kennard;Fabien Leprieur;Pablo A. Tedesco

  • A framework for hydrologic classification with a review of methodologies and applications in ecohydrology

    Julian D. Olden;Mark James Kennard;Bradley James Pusey

  • Are alien fish a reliable indicator of river health

    Mark James Kennard;Angela Arthington;Bradley James Pusey;B.D. Harch

  • Integration of science and monitoring of river ecosystem health to guide investments in catchment protection and rehabilitation

    Stuart Bunn;E. G. Abal;M. J. Smith;S. C. Choy

  • Quantifying uncertainty in estimation of hydrologic metrics for ecohydrological studies

    Mark James Kennard;Mark James Kennard;Stephen John Mackay;Bradley James Pusey;Bradley James Pusey;Julian D. Olden

  • Are large‐scale flow experiments informing the science and management of freshwater ecosystems?

    Julian D. Olden;Christopher P. Konrad;Theodore S. Melis;Mark James Kennard

  • Climate change and its implications for Australia's freshwater fish

    John R. Morrongiello;John R. Morrongiello;John R. Morrongiello;Stephen J. Beatty;James C. Bennett;James C. Bennett;David A. Crook;David A. Crook

  • Species invasions and the changing biogeography of Australian freshwater fishes

    Julian D. Olden;Mark James Kennard;Bradley James Pusey

  • Large-scale Flow Experiments for Managing River Systems

    Christopher P. Konrad;Julian D. Olden;David A. Lytle;Theodore S. Melis

  • The ‘wet–dry’ in the wet–dry tropics drives river ecosystem structure and processes in northern Australia

    D. M. Warfe;N. E. Pettit;P.M. Davies;Bradley James Pusey

  • Environmental flow requirements of fish in Lesotho rivers using the DRIFT methodology

    Angela Arthington;Johan L. Rall;Mark James Kennard;Bradley James Pusey

  • Intercontinental Comparison of Fish Life History Strategies along a Gradient of Hydrologic Variability

    Julian D. Olden;Mark James Kennard

  • Challenges and opportunities in implementing managed relocation for conservation of freshwater species.

    Julian D. Olden;Mark James Kennard;Joshua J. Lawler;N. LeRoy Poff

  • Integrating multidirectional connectivity requirements in systematic conservation planning for freshwater systems

    Virgilio Hermoso;Mark J. Kennard;Simon Linke

  • Multiscale effects of flow regime and habitat and their interaction on fish assemblage structure in eastern Australia

    Mark James Kennard;Julian D. Olden;Angela Arthington;Bradley James Pusey

  • CLASSIFICATION OF FLOW REGIMES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW ASSESSMENT IN REGULATED RIVERS: THE HUAI RIVER BASIN, CHINA

    Y. Zhang;A. H. Arthington;S. E. Bunn;S. Mackay

  • Bayesian network models for environmental flow decision making in the Daly River, Northern Territory, Australia

    Terence U. Chan;Barry T. Hart;Mark James Kennard;Bradley James Pusey

Frequent Co-Authors

Bradley James Pusey
Bradley James Pusey University of Western Australia
Michael M. Douglas
Michael M. Douglas University of Western Australia
Angela Arthington
Angela Arthington Griffith University
Julian D. Olden
Julian D. Olden University of Washington
Virgilio Hermoso
Virgilio Hermoso Griffith University
Nick Bond
Nick Bond La Trobe University
Stuart E. Bunn
Stuart E. Bunn Griffith University
Simon Linke
Simon Linke CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research
Vanessa M. Adams
Vanessa M. Adams University of Tasmania
Fran Sheldon
Fran Sheldon Griffith University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in the fields of Ecology and Evolution, there are several online degree pathways that can lead to diverse career opportunities, especially in healthcare and research. Many professionals pursue advanced credentials to expand their skills and job prospects.

For those with a background in science or healthcare, exploring options such as how to become a nurse practitioner can open doors to one of the fastest-growing fields in the U.S. Additionally, nurses can rapidly advance with accelerated programs like the 6-month rn to bsn program, which delivers advanced credentials in a short timeframe.

If you hold an associate degree in nursing, consider exploring adn to np programs online to bridge into advanced practice nursing roles. Those from non-nursing backgrounds can also transition into healthcare by enrolling in online direct entry msn programs for non-nurses, providing a streamlined path to an advanced degree.

These flexible online options can help you build a meaningful career at the intersection of science, healthcare, and research, whether you are starting out or seeking to advance your expertise.

Best Scientists Citing Mark J. Kennard

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles