World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
47
Citations
8205
World Ranking
4440
National Ranking
349

Vanessa M. Adams publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vanessa M. Adams sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 152 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Vanessa M. Adams D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vanessa M. Adams sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Vanessa M. Adams is affiliated with the University of Tasmania in Australia and specializes in Environmental Science, with a focus on several key subfields and topics. Their research output includes work across subfields such as Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, and Nature and Landscape Conservation.

The main topics covered in their research include Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management; Economic and Environmental Valuation; Land Use and Ecosystem Services; Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies; Wildlife Ecology and Conservation; Species Distribution and Climate Change; and Forest Management and Policy.

Their frequently published works have appeared in a variety of academic journals and venues. These include:

  • Biological Conservation
  • One Earth
  • Conservation Science and Practice
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Nature Ecology & Evolution

Vanessa M. Adams has collaborated extensively with several coauthors, among whom the most frequent are:

  • Rachael V. Gallagher
  • Jason Byrne
  • Hugh P. Possingham
  • James Watson
  • Natalie Stoeckl

Representative recent papers authored or coauthored by Vanessa M. Adams include:

  • "Areas of global importance for conserving terrestrial biodiversity, carbon and water," 2021, Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • "Open Science principles for accelerating trait-based science across the Tree of Life," 2020, Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • "The minimum land area requiring conservation attention to safeguard biodiversity," 2022, Science
  • "High fire frequency and the impact of the 2019-2020 megafires on Australian plant diversity," 2021, Diversity and Distributions
  • "Protecting 30% of the planet for nature: costs, benefits and economic implications," 2020, DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC))

Best Publications

  • Estimating the financial risks of Andropogon gayanus to greenhouse gas abatement projects in northern Australia

    Vanessa M Adams;Vanessa M Adams;Samantha A Setterfield

  • A guideline to improve qualitative social science publishing in ecology and conservation journals

    Katie Moon;Katie Moon;Tom D. Brewer;Tom D. Brewer;Stephanie R. Januchowski-Hartley;Vanessa M. Adams

  • Measuring benefits of protected area management: trends across realms and research gaps for freshwater systems.

    Vanessa M. Adams;Samantha A. Setterfield;Michael M. Douglas;Mark J. Kennard

  • Areas of global importance for conserving terrestrial biodiversity, carbon and water

    Martin Jung;Andy Arnell;Xavier de Lamo;Shaenandhoa García-Rangel

  • Opportunity costs: Who really pays for conservation?

    Vanessa M. Adams;Robert L. Pressey;Robin Naidoo

  • The minimum land area requiring conservation attention to safeguard biodiversity

    Unknown

  • Messaging matters: A systematic review of the conservation messaging literature

    Lindall R. Kidd;Lindall R. Kidd;Georgia E. Garrard;Georgia E. Garrard;Sarah A. Bekessy;Sarah A. Bekessy;Sarah A. Bekessy;Morena Mills

  • Open Science principles for accelerating trait-based science across the Tree of Life

    Rachael V. Gallagher;Daniel S. Falster;Brian S. Maitner;Roberto Salguero-Gómez;Roberto Salguero-Gómez;Roberto Salguero-Gómez

  • Designing, implementing and managing marine protected areas: emerging trends and opportunities for coral reef nations

    Natalie C. Ban;Vanessa M. Adams;Glenn R. Almany;Stephen Ban

  • Adapting systematic conservation planning for climate change

    April E. Reside;April E. Reside;Nathalie Butt;Vanessa M. Adams

  • Importance of the seed bank for population viability and population monitoring in a threatened wetland herb

    Vanessa M. Adams;David M. Marsh;John S. Knox

  • High fire frequency and the impact of the 2019–2020 megafires on Australian plant diversity

    Rachael V. Gallagher;Stuart Allen;Berin D. E. Mackenzie;Berin D. E. Mackenzie;Colin J. Yates

  • Expanding the role of social science in conservation through an engagement with philosophy, methodology and methods

    Katie Moon;Katie Moon;Deborah A. Blackman;Vanessa M. Adams;Rebecca M. Colvin

  • Area-based conservation: Taking stock and looking ahead

    Unknown

  • Dispersal connectivity and reserve selection for marine conservation

    Stuart Kininmonth;Stuart Kininmonth;Maria Beger;Michael Bode;Michael Bode;Eric Peterson

  • Standardized reporting of the costs of management interventions for biodiversity conservation

    Gwenllian D. Iacona;William J. Sutherland;Bonnie Mappin;Vanessa M. Adams

  • Weighing the benefits of expanding protected areas versus managing existing ones

    Vanessa M. Adams;Vanessa M. Adams;Gwenllian D. Iacona;Hugh P. Possingham;Hugh P. Possingham

  • Protecting 30% of the planet for nature: costs, benefits and economic implications

    Anthony Waldron;Vanessa Adams;James Allan;Andy Arnell

  • Improving social acceptability of marine protected area networks: a method for estimating opportunity costs to multiple gear types in both fished and currently unfished areas

    Vanessa M. Adams;Morena Mills;Stacy D. Jupiter;Robert L. Pressey

  • Mental models for conservation research and practice

    Katie Moon;Angela M. Guerrero;Vanessa. M. Adams;Duan Biggs;Duan Biggs;Duan Biggs

  • Promise and problems for estimating management costs of marine protected areas

    Natalie C. Ban;Vanessa Adams;Robert L. Pressey;John Hicks

  • Planning Across Freshwater and Terrestrial Realms: Cobenefits and Tradeoffs Between Conservation Actions

    Vanessa M. Adams;Vanessa M. Adams;Jorge G. Álvarez-Romero;Josie Carwardine;Lorenzo Cattarino

  • Research advances and gaps in marine planning: towards a global database in systematic conservation planning

    Jorge G. Álvarez-Romero;Morena Mills;Morena Mills;Vanessa M. Adams;Vanessa M. Adams;Vanessa M. Adams;Georgina G. Gurney

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert L. Pressey
Robert L. Pressey James Cook University
Hugh P. Possingham
Hugh P. Possingham University of Queensland
Morena Mills
Morena Mills Imperial College London
Samantha A. Setterfield
Samantha A. Setterfield University of Western Australia
Rachael V. Gallagher
Rachael V. Gallagher Macquarie University
Michael M. Douglas
Michael M. Douglas University of Western Australia
Moreno Di Marco
Moreno Di Marco Sapienza University of Rome
James E. M. Watson
James E. M. Watson University of Queensland
Brian J. Enquist
Brian J. Enquist University of Arizona
Mark J. Kennard
Mark J. Kennard Griffith University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Ecology and Evolution, similar online degree options in the health sciences can offer diverse and rewarding career pathways. Nursing programs, for instance, provide specialized routes to advance your education quickly and efficiently.

If you are considering a nursing career, understanding dnp psychiatric nurse practitioner salary by state can help gauge earning potential in this fast-growing field. Students looking for a quicker academic path may want to know how long to become a nurse practitioner—some programs are designed to streamline the process and get you started in the workforce sooner.

There are also flexible options for current nurses to advance their credentials. The shortest rn to bsn program can be completed in as little as six months for qualifying students, while those with an associate’s degree can explore asn to fnp programs to become a family nurse practitioner. These dynamic online degrees open doors to impactful roles within both clinical and research settings.

Best Scientists Citing Vanessa M. Adams

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles