World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
50
Citations
13342
World Ranking
3756
National Ranking
64

Moreno Di Marco publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Moreno Di Marco sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 110 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Moreno Di Marco D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Moreno Di Marco sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Moreno Di Marco is affiliated with the Sapienza University of Rome in Italy and has a significant presence in the field of environmental science. Their research spans multiple subfields including ecology, global and planetary change, ecological modeling, nature and landscape conservation, and public health related to environmental and occupational health.

The scientist's work addresses several main topics, notably species distribution and climate change, wildlife ecology and conservation, ecology and vegetation dynamics studies, land use and ecosystem services, conservation, biodiversity and resource management, zoonotic diseases and public health, and animal disease management and epidemiology.

They have contributed to various recent papers, including:

  • Bending the curve of terrestrial biodiversity needs an integrated strategy (2020, Nature)
  • Areas of global importance for conserving terrestrial biodiversity, carbon and water (2021, Nature Ecology & Evolution)
  • Sustainable development must account for pandemic risk (2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • Change in Terrestrial Human Footprint Drives Continued Loss of Intact Ecosystems (2020, One Earth)
  • The minimum land area requiring conservation attention to safeguard biodiversity (2022, Science)

Moreno Di Marco collaborates frequently with several researchers, including Carlo Rondinini, Luca Santini, James Watson, Giordano Mancini, and Stuart H. M. Butchart.

Their most frequent publication venues include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Conservation Biology, Nature, Ecography, and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Best Publications

  • Global hotspots and correlates of emerging zoonotic diseases

    Toph Allen;Kris A. Murray;Carlos Zambrana-Torrelio;Stephen S. Morse

  • Bending the curve of terrestrial biodiversity needs an integrated strategy

    David Leclère;Michael Obersteiner;Michael Obersteiner;Mike Barrett;Stuart H.M. Butchart;Stuart H.M. Butchart

  • Targeting global protected area expansion for imperiled biodiversity.

    Oscar Venter;Richard A. Fuller;Daniel B. Segan;Josie Carwardine

  • Quantification of habitat fragmentation reveals extinction risk in terrestrial mammals.

    Kevin R. Crooks;Christopher L. Burdett;David M. Theobald;Sarah R. B. King

  • Catastrophic Declines in Wilderness Areas Undermine Global Environment Targets

    James E.M. Watson;James E.M. Watson;Danielle F. Shanahan;Moreno Di Marco;James Allan

  • Imputation of missing data in life-history trait datasets: which approach performs the best?

    Caterina Penone;Ana D. Davidson;Ana D. Davidson;Kevin T. Shoemaker;Moreno Di Marco

  • Generation length for mammals

    Michela Pacifici;Luca Santini;Moreno Di Marco;Daniele Baisero

  • Global habitat suitability models of terrestrial mammals.

    Carlo Rondinini;Moreno Di Marco;Federica Chiozza;Giulia Santulli

  • Opinion: Sustainable development must account for pandemic risk.

    Moreno Di Marco;Moreno Di Marco;Michelle L. Baker;Peter Daszak;Paul De Barro

  • Areas of global importance for conserving terrestrial biodiversity, carbon and water

    Martin Jung;Andy Arnell;Xavier de Lamo;Shaenandhoa García-Rangel

  • Changing trends and persisting biases in three decades of conservation science

    Moreno Di Marco;Sarah Chapman;Glenn Althor;Stephen Kearney

  • Climate change modifies risk of global biodiversity loss due to land-cover change

    Chrystal S. Mantyka-Pringle;Piero Visconti;Piero Visconti;Moreno Di Marco;Tara G. Martin;Tara G. Martin

  • Change in Terrestrial Human Footprint Drives Continued Loss of Intact Ecosystems

    Brooke A. Williams;Oscar Venter;James R. Allan;Scott C. Atkinson;Scott C. Atkinson

  • Bias in protected‐area location and its effects on long‐term aspirations of biodiversity conventions

    Oscar Venter;Ainhoa Magrach;Ainhoa Magrach;Nick Outram;Carissa Joy Klein

  • Projecting Global Biodiversity Indicators under Future Development Scenarios

    Piero Visconti;Piero Visconti;Michel Bakkenes;Daniele Baisero;Thomas Brooks;Thomas Brooks;Thomas Brooks

  • Changes in human footprint drive changes in species extinction risk.

    Moreno Di Marco;Moreno Di Marco;Oscar Venter;Hugh P. Possingham;Hugh P. Possingham;James E. M. Watson;James E. M. Watson

  • Widespread shortfalls in protected area resourcing undermine efforts to conserve biodiversity

    Lauren Coad;James E. M. Watson;James E. M. Watson;Jonas Geldmann;Neil D. Burgess;Neil D. Burgess

  • The minimum land area requiring conservation attention to safeguard biodiversity

    Unknown

  • Global mismatch of policy and research on drivers of biodiversity loss.

    Tessa Mazor;Christopher Doropoulos;Florian Schwarzmueller;Daniel W. Gladish

  • Wilderness areas halve the extinction risk of terrestrial biodiversity

    Moreno Di Marco;Moreno Di Marco;Simon Ferrier;Tom D. Harwood;Andrew J. Hoskins

  • Persistent Disparities between Recent Rates of Habitat Conversion and Protection and Implications for Future Global Conservation Targets

    James E.M. Watson;James E.M. Watson;Kendall R. Jones;Richard A. Fuller;Moreno Di Marco

Frequent Co-Authors

James E. M. Watson
James E. M. Watson University of Queensland
Hugh P. Possingham
Hugh P. Possingham University of Queensland
Carlo Rondinini
Carlo Rondinini Sapienza University of Rome
Piero Visconti
Piero Visconti International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
Oscar Venter
Oscar Venter University of Northern British Columbia
Stuart H. M. Butchart
Stuart H. M. Butchart BirdLife international, UK
Luigi Boitani
Luigi Boitani Sapienza University of Rome
Thomas M. Brooks
Thomas M. Brooks International Union for Conservation of Nature
Luca Santini
Luca Santini Sapienza University of Rome
Vanessa M. Adams
Vanessa M. Adams University of Tasmania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution opens doors to diverse career opportunities, many of which increasingly require interdisciplinary knowledge and advanced credentials. For instance, professionals interested in communication sciences can access asha accredited online slp master's programs, ensuring rigorous ASHA standards are met and expanding career pathways in healthcare and education.

If you have a non-SLP background but are considering a switch, online bridge programs non-SLP majors offer essential coursework to help you transition smoothly into this field.

Nursing is another evolving field for science graduates. Those interested in healthcare can benefit from flexible education options, such as the best online bsn programs for non nurses, which can fast-track individuals into nursing without prior experience.

Graduates concerned about future earning potential can explore advanced roles. For example, exploring data like psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner salary levels by state can help you make informed decisions about career direction and financial outlook.

Best Scientists Citing Moreno Di Marco

Trending Scientists