World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
32
Citations
13448
World Ranking
7977
National Ranking
781

Samantha L. L. Hill publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Samantha L. L. Hill sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 59 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Samantha L. L. Hill D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Samantha L. L. Hill sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Samantha L. L. Hill is affiliated with the World Conservation Monitoring Centre in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science with a particular emphasis on global and planetary change, nature and landscape conservation, ecology, ecological modeling, as well as management, monitoring, policy, and law.

The scientist's work addresses several key topics, including:

  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Environmental Conservation and Management
  • Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation

Their recent publications reveal a focus on biodiversity, ecosystem services, and conservation policy. Notable papers include:

  • "Bending the curve of terrestrial biodiversity needs an integrated strategy," 2020, Nature
  • "Set ambitious goals for biodiversity and sustainability," 2020, Science
  • "Mapping co-benefits for carbon storage and biodiversity to inform conservation policy and action," 2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • "Scientific foundations for an ecosystem goal, milestones and indicators for the post-2020 global biodiversity framework," 2021, Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • "Global trends and scenarios for terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystem services from 1900 to 2050," 2024, Science

Frequent collaborators in their research include Andy Purvis, Adriana De Palma, Neil D. Burgess, David Leclère, and Aafke M. Schipper. These partnerships suggest interdisciplinary engagement spanning biodiversity science and conservation.

Samantha L. L. Hill's work is published in various scientific venues, with multiple publications appearing in Frontiers in Veterinary Science, Natural History Museum, London, Science, Nature Ecology & Evolution, and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory).

Best Publications

  • Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity

    Tim Newbold;Lawrence N Hudson;Samantha L L Hill;Sara Contu

  • A mid-term analysis of progress toward international biodiversity targets

    Derek P. Tittensor;Derek P. Tittensor;Matt Walpole;Samantha L. L. Hill;Daniel G. Boyce;Daniel G. Boyce

  • Has land use pushed terrestrial biodiversity beyond the planetary boundary? A global assessment

    Tim Newbold;Tim Newbold;Lawrence N. Hudson;Andrew P. Arnell;Sara Contu

  • Bending the curve of terrestrial biodiversity needs an integrated strategy

    David Leclère;Michael Obersteiner;Michael Obersteiner;Mike Barrett;Stuart H.M. Butchart;Stuart H.M. Butchart

  • Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide

    Claudia L. Gray;Samantha L. L. Hill;Tim Newbold;Lawrence N. Hudson

  • Living Planet Report 2018: Aiming Higher

    M. Barrett;A. Belward;S: Bladen;T. Breeze

  • Set ambitious goals for biodiversity and sustainability

    Sandra Díaz;Noelia Zafra-Calvo;Andy Purvis;Peter H. Verburg

  • A global model of the response of tropical and sub-tropical forest biodiversity to anthropogenic pressures

    Tim Newbold;Tim Newbold;Lawrence N. Hudson;Lawrence N. Hudson;Helen R. P. Phillips;Helen R. P. Phillips;Samantha L. L. Hill;Samantha L. L. Hill;Samantha L. L. Hill

  • The database of the PREDICTS (Projecting Responses of Ecological Diversity In Changing Terrestrial Systems) project

    Lawrence N. Hudson;Tim Newbold;Tim Newbold;Sara Contu;Samantha L.L. Hill;Samantha L.L. Hill

  • The PREDICTS database: a global database of how local terrestrial biodiversity responds to human impacts

    Lawrence N Hudson;Tim Newbold;Tim Newbold;Sara Contu;Samantha L L Hill;Samantha L L Hill

  • Widespread winners and narrow-ranged losers: Land use homogenizes biodiversity in local assemblages worldwide.

    Tim Newbold;Lawrence N Hudson;Sara Contu;Samantha L L Hill;Samantha L L Hill

  • Global trends and scenarios for terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystem services from 1900 to 2050

    Unknown

  • Mapping co-benefits for carbon storage and biodiversity to inform conservation policy and action

    C Soto-Navarro;C Ravilious;A Arnell;X de Lamo

  • Scientific foundations for an ecosystem goal, milestones and indicators for the post-2020 global biodiversity framework.

    Emily Nicholson;Emily Nicholson;Kate E. Watermeyer;Jessica A. Rowland;Chloe F. Sato

  • Bridging the research-implementation gap in IUCN Red List assessments.

    Unknown

  • A metric for spatially explicit contributions to science-based species targets.

    Louise Mair;Leon A. Bennun;Thomas M. Brooks;Thomas M. Brooks;Thomas M. Brooks;Stuart H. M. Butchart;Stuart H. M. Butchart

  • Global effects of land use on biodiversity differ among functional groups

    Tim Newbold;Laura F. Bentley;Samantha L. L. Hill;Samantha L. L. Hill;Melanie J. Edgar

  • Global patterns of terrestrial assemblage turnover within and among land uses

    Tim Newbold;Tim Newbold;Lawrence N. Hudson;Samantha L. L. Hill;Samantha L. L. Hill;Sara Contu

  • Projecting impacts of global climate and land‐use scenarios on plant biodiversity using compositional‐turnover modelling

    Moreno Di Marco;Moreno Di Marco;Tom D. Harwood;Andrew J. Hoskins;Chris Ware

  • A protocol for an intercomparison of biodiversity and ecosystem services models using harmonized land-use and climate scenarios

    HyeJin Kim;Isabel M. D. Rosa;Rob Alkemade;Rob Alkemade;Paul Leadley

  • Relating characteristics of global biodiversity targets to reported progress.

    Elizabeth J. Green;Elizabeth J. Green;Graeme M. Buchanan;Stuart H. M. Butchart;Stuart H. M. Butchart;Georgina M. Chandler

  • Challenges With Inferring How Land-Use Affects Terrestrial Biodiversity: Study Design, Time, Space and Synthesis

    Adriana De Palma;Katia Sanchez-Ortiz;Katia Sanchez-Ortiz;Philip A. Martin;Amy Chadwick

Frequent Co-Authors

Andy Purvis
Andy Purvis Natural History Museum
Tim Newbold
Tim Newbold University College London
Jörn P. W. Scharlemann
Jörn P. W. Scharlemann University of Sussex
Piero Visconti
Piero Visconti International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
Georgina M. Mace
Georgina M. Mace University College London
Neil D. Burgess
Neil D. Burgess University of Copenhagen
Simon Ferrier
Simon Ferrier Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Stuart H. M. Butchart
Stuart H. M. Butchart BirdLife international, UK
Rob Alkemade
Rob Alkemade Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
Aafke M. Schipper
Aafke M. Schipper Radboud University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Ecology and Evolution, various online degrees can open doors to interdisciplinary career pathways in science, healthcare, and education. Healthcare careers, for example, often benefit from advanced knowledge in biological sciences and offer flexible online learning options.

If you're considering a nursing pathway, understanding the psychiatric nurse practitioner salary by state can help you weigh your options, as salaries vary widely depending on location and specialization. Entry into advanced nursing is accessible with programs such as a 6-month rn to bsn program online, which allows registered nurses to quickly earn a Bachelor of Science in Nursing.

Those seeking to move farther in their career can explore asn to np programs, which bridge associate degrees to a master's level and prepare graduates for nurse practitioner roles. Curious about advancement speed? Discover how long to become a nurse practitioner and learn about both traditional and accelerated timelines.

With so many flexible options and career pathways connecting health, the environment, and society, online programs are a smart way to expand your expertise and find your future role.

Best Scientists Citing Samantha L. L. Hill

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles