World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Emmanuel Kuntsche

Emmanuel Kuntsche

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
67
Citations
16070
World Ranking
2603
National Ranking
128

Emmanuel Kuntsche publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emmanuel Kuntsche sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 279 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Emmanuel Kuntsche D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emmanuel Kuntsche sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Emmanuel Kuntsche is affiliated with La Trobe University in Australia and has a research profile that spans multiple fields related to medicine and psychology. Their work primarily focuses on substance abuse treatment and outcomes, with additional emphasis on behavioral health and interventions, homelessness and social issues, and alcohol consumption and health effects.

The scientist's publication record includes studies published in prominent journals, reflecting diverse aspects of substance use and public health. Recent papers include:

  • Shifts in alcohol consumption during the COVID-19 pandemic: early indications from Australia (2020, Addiction)
  • Purchasing, consumption, demographic and socioeconomic variables associated with shifts in alcohol consumption during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020, Drug and Alcohol Review)
  • Digital health interventions for all? Examining inclusivity across all stages of the digital health intervention research process (2024, Trials)
  • Wearable Transdermal Alcohol Monitors: A Systematic Review of Detection Validity, and Relationship Between Transdermal and Breath Alcohol Concentration and Influencing Factors (2020, Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research)
  • The who and what of women's drinking: Examining risky drinking and associated socio-demographic factors among women aged 40-65 years in Australia (2022, Drug and Alcohol Review)

Emmanuel Kuntsche's research is frequently published in several high-impact venues, including:

  • Drug and Alcohol Review
  • Addiction
  • International Journal of Drug Policy
  • Addictive Behaviors
  • Alcohol and Alcoholism

The scientist collaborates extensively with other researchers. Frequent co-authors include Sandra Kuntsche, Benjamin C. Riordan, Cassandra J. C. Wright, Dan Anderson-Luxford, and Koen Smit.

Their academic contributions are categorized primarily under the broader fields of Medicine and Psychology, with significant attention to subfields such as Epidemiology, General Health Professions, Applied Psychology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Sociology and Political Science.

Key research topics addressed in their publications cover the following:

  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Work-Family Balance Challenges

Best Publications

  • Why do young people drink? A review of drinking motives.

    Emmanuel Kuntsche;Ronald A. Knibbe;Gerhard Gmel;Rutger Engels

  • Characteristics of binge drinkers in Europe

    E Kuntsche;J Rehm;J Rehm;G Gmel

  • Who drinks and why? A review of socio-demographic, personality, and contextual issues behind the drinking motives in young people

    Emmanuel Kuntsche;Ronald A. Knibbe;Gerhard Gmel;Rutger Engels

  • Motivational models of substance use: A review of theory and research on motives for using alcohol, marijuana, and tobacco.

    M. Lynne Cooper;Emmanuel Kuntsche;Ash Levitt;Lindsay L Barber

  • Binge drinking: Health impact, prevalence, correlates and interventions

    Emmanuel Kuntsche;Sandra Kuntsche;Johannes Thrul;Gerhard Gmel

  • Drinking at European universities? A review of students' alcohol use

    Matthias Wicki;Emmanuel Kuntsche;Gerhard Gmel;Gerhard Gmel

  • Development and Validation of the Drinking Motive Questionnaire Revised Short Form (DMQ–R SF)

    Emmanuel Kuntsche;Sandra Kuntsche

  • How stable is the motive-alcohol use link? A cross-national validation of the Drinking Motives Questionnaire Revised among adolescents from Switzerland, Canada, and the United States.

    Emmanuel Kuntsche;Sherry H Stewart;M Lynne Cooper

  • Binge drinking in Europe: definitions, epidemiology, and consequences

    Gerhard Gmel;Jürgen Rehm;Emmanuel Kuntsche

  • Decreases in adolescent weekly alcohol use in Europe and North America: evidence from 28 countries from 2002 to 2010.

    Margaretha de Looze;Quinten Raaijmakers;Tom ter Bogt;Pernille Bendtsen

  • Risky single‐occasion drinking: bingeing is not bingeing

    Gerhard Gmel;Emmanuel Kuntsche;Emmanuel Kuntsche;Jürgen T. Rehm;Jürgen T. Rehm;Jürgen T. Rehm

  • Drinking Motives as Mediators of the Link Between Alcohol Expectancies and Alcohol Use Among Adolescents

    Emmanuel Kuntsche;Ronald Knibbe;Rutger Engels;Gerhard Gmel

  • Personality factors and alcohol use: A mediator analysis of drinking motives

    Emmanuel Kuntsche;Madeleine von Fischer;Gerhard Gmel;Gerhard Gmel

  • Cultural and Gender Convergence in Adolescent Drunkenness Evidence From 23 European and North American Countries

    Emmanuel Kuntsche;Emmanuel Kuntsche;Sandra Kuntsche;Ronald Knibbe;Bruce Simons-Morton

  • Cross national study of injury and social determinants in adolescents

    William Pickett;Michal Molcho;K. Simpson;Ian Janssen

  • Drinking Motives and Links to Alcohol Use in 13 European Countries

    Emmanuel Kuntsche;Saoirse Nic Gabhainn;Chris Roberts;Béat Windlin

  • Replication and validation of the Drinking Motive Questionnaire Revised (DMQ-R, Cooper, 1994) among adolescents in Switzerland.

    Emmanuel Kuntsche;Ronald Knibbe;Gerhard Gmel;Rutger Engels

  • Parent-based interventions for preventing or reducing adolescent substance use — A systematic literature review

    Sandra Kuntsche;Emmanuel Kuntsche

  • Adolescent alcohol and cannabis use in relation to peer and school factors. Results of multilevel analyses.

    Emmanuel Kuntsche;Marina Delgrande Jordan

  • Gender specific trends in alcohol use: cross-cultural comparisons from 1998 to 2006 in 24 countries and regions.

    Bruce G. Simons-Morton;Tilda Farhat;Tom F. M. ter Bogt;Anne Hublet

  • Motivational Models of Substance Use

    M. Lynne Cooper;Emmanuel Kuntsche;Ash Levitt;Lindsay L. Barber

  • Binge drinking: Health impact, prevalence,correlates and interventions - eScholarship

    Emmanuel Kuntsche;Sandra Kuntsche;Johannes Thrul;Gerhard Gmel

Frequent Co-Authors

Rutger C. M. E. Engels
Rutger C. M. E. Engels Erasmus University Rotterdam
Gerhard Gmel
Gerhard Gmel University of Lausanne
Michael Livingston
Michael Livingston La Trobe University
Ronald A. Knibbe
Ronald A. Knibbe Maastricht University
Roy Otten
Roy Otten Radboud University
Marloes Kleinjan
Marloes Kleinjan Utrecht University
Jürgen Rehm
Jürgen Rehm University of Toronto
Tom F. M. ter Bogt
Tom F. M. ter Bogt Utrecht University
Robin Room
Robin Room La Trobe University
Zsolt Demetrovics
Zsolt Demetrovics Flinders University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of related fields, especially in social work and human services. For those interested in helping others and shaping communities, social work degrees can be a rewarding complement or alternative pathway to psychology.

Online degrees offer flexible options for both new students and working professionals. When considering a program, it's important to look for options that provide strong value and job prospects after graduation. For example, students in Iowa may wish to review the most valuable online social work degrees in Dubuque, while those in the Midwest can explore the best value online social work programs in Indiana.

Other top-rated programs are available throughout the country. The best value online social work degrees in Kansas offer specialized tracks, and students seeking opportunities on the East Coast may benefit from looking into the most valuable online social work programs in Maryland.

No matter your state, choosing an accredited and reputable program is key to building a successful career in psychology or social work.

Best Scientists Citing Emmanuel Kuntsche

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles