World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
72
Citations
20857
World Ranking
2053
National Ranking
1195

Megan E. Patrick publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Megan E. Patrick sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 285 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Megan E. Patrick D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Megan E. Patrick sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Megan E. Patrick is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research focuses extensively on substance use, behavioral health, and related epidemiological outcomes. Their work spans multiple aspects of medicine and psychology, with a particular emphasis on epidemiology, general health professions, pharmacology, physiology, and clinical psychology.

The scientist's recent papers cover a range of topics primarily linked to alcohol, marijuana, and nicotine use among youth and young adults. Notable publications include:

  • "Trends in Use and Perceptions of Nicotine Vaping Among US Youth From 2017 to 2020" (2020) in JAMA Pediatrics
  • "Changes in Young Adults' Alcohol and Marijuana Use, Norms, and Motives From Before to During the COVID-19 Pandemic" (2021) in Journal of Adolescent Health
  • "Simultaneous Alcohol and Marijuana Use Among Young Adults: A Scoping Review of Prevalence, Patterns, Psychosocial Correlates, and Consequences" (2022) in Alcohol research
  • "Negative alcohol-related consequences experienced by young adults in the past 12 months: Differences by college attendance, living situation, binge drinking, and sex" (2020) in Addictive Behaviors
  • "A Daily Study Comparing Alcohol-Related Positive and Negative Consequences for Days With Only Alcohol Use Versus Days With Simultaneous Alcohol and Marijuana Use in a Community Sample of Young Adults" (2020) in Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research

Collaboration has been an important part of their research. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Christine M. Lee
  • Yvonne M. Terry-McElrath
  • Anne M. Fairlie
  • Brian H. Calhoun
  • Michael J. Parks

The scientist's work has been published predominantly in specific venues such as:

  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • Addictive Behaviors
  • Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
  • Alcohol Clinical and Experimental Research
  • Journal of Adolescent Health

Their main fields of study are medicine and psychology. Subfields of focused research activity include epidemiology, general health professions, pharmacology, physiology, and clinical psychology. The major research topics they address comprise:

  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Homelessness and Social Issues
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health

Best Publications

  • Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2017: Overview, key findings on adolescent drug use

    Lloyd D. Johnston;Richard A. Miech;Patrick M. O'Malley;Jerald G. Bachman

  • Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2019: Volume II, college students and adults ages 19-60

    John Schulenberg;Lloyd Johnston;Patrick O'Malley;Jerald Bachman

  • Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2016: Volume II, college students and adults ages 19-55

    J. E. Schulenberg;L. D.. Johnston;P. M. O'Malley;J. G. Bachman

  • Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2018: Volume II, college students and adults ages 19-60

    John Schulenberg;Lloyd Johnston;Patrick O'Malley;Jerald Bachman

  • Monitoring the Future National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975-2018: Overview, Key Findings on Adolescent Drug Use.

    Lloyd D. Johnston;Richard A. Miech;Patrick M. O'Malley;Jerald G. Bachman

  • Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2019: Overview, key findings on adolescent drug use

    Lloyd D. Johnston;Richard A. Miech;Patrick M. O'Malley;Jerald G. Bachman

  • Socioeconomic Status and Substance Use Among Young Adults: A Comparison Across Constructs and Drugs

    Megan E. Patrick;Patrick Wightman;Robert F. Schoeni;John E. Schulenberg

  • Trends in Adolescent Vaping, 2017–2019

    Richard Miech;Lloyd Johnston;Patrick M. O’Malley;Jerald G. Bachman

  • Prevalence and predictors of adolescent alcohol use and binge drinking in the United States.

    Megan E. Patrick;John E. Schulenberg

  • What is a representative brain? Neuroscience meets population science.

    Emily B. Falk;Luke W. Hyde;Colter Mitchell;Jessica Faul

  • Extreme Binge Drinking Among 12th-Grade Students in the United States: Prevalence and Predictors

    Megan E. Patrick;John E. Schulenberg;Meghan E. Martz;Jennifer L. Maggs

  • Latent transition analysis: Benefits of a latent variable approach to modeling transitions in substance use

    Stephanie T. Lanza;Megan E. Patrick;Jennifer L. Maggs

  • E-cigarette use as a predictor of cigarette smoking: results from a 1-year follow-up of a national sample of 12th grade students.

    Richard Miech;Megan E Patrick;Patrick M O'Malley;Lloyd D Johnston

  • Adolescents' reported reasons for alcohol and marijuana use as predictors of substance use and problems in adulthood

    Megan E. Patrick;John E. Schulenberg;Patrick M. O'malley;Lloyd D. Johnston

  • Adolescent Vaping and Nicotine Use in 2017-2018 - U.S. National Estimates.

    Richard Miech;Lloyd Johnston;Patrick M. O’Malley;Jerald G. Bachman

  • Childhood and adolescent predictors of alcohol use and problems in adolescence and adulthood in the National Child Development Study

    Jennifer L. Maggs;Jennifer L. Maggs;Megan E. Patrick;Leon Feinstein

  • Is There a Recent Epidemic of Women's Drinking? A Critical Review of National Studies.

    Katherine M. Keyes;Katherine M. Keyes;Justin Jager;Tatini Mal-Sarkar;Megan E. Patrick

  • Trends in use of marijuana and attitudes toward marijuana among youth before and after decriminalization: the case of California 2007-2013

    Richard A. Miech;Lloyd Johnston;Patrick M. O’Malley;Jerald G. Bachman

  • Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2017: Volume II, college students and adults ages 19-55

    J.E. Schulenberg;L.D. Johnston;P.M. O'Malley;J.G. Bachman

  • Monitoring the Future National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975-2018. Volume I, Secondary School Students.

    Richard A. Miech;Lloyd D. Johnston;Patrick M. O'Malley;Jerald G. Bachman

  • Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2016: Volume I, secondary school students

    Richard A. Miech;Lloyd D. Johnston;Patrick M. O'Malley;Jerald G. Bachman

Frequent Co-Authors

John E. Schulenberg
John E. Schulenberg University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Patrick M. O'Malley
Patrick M. O'Malley University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Lloyd D. Johnston
Lloyd D. Johnston University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jennifer L. Maggs
Jennifer L. Maggs Pennsylvania State University
Jerald G. Bachman
Jerald G. Bachman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Christine M. Lee
Christine M. Lee University of Washington
Yvonne M. Terry-McElrath
Yvonne M. Terry-McElrath University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Melissa A. Lewis
Melissa A. Lewis University of North Texas Health Science Center
Mary E. Larimer
Mary E. Larimer University of Washington
Clayton Neighbors
Clayton Neighbors University of Houston

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens the door to various academic and professional pathways. Many students interested in psychological science also consider online counseling degrees, which provide flexible learning while preparing graduates for licensure and clinical work. Online programs are especially appealing for those seeking to balance work, family, and education.

Regional specialization can also shape your career options. For instance, the best-ranked counseling degree programs in Arizona are known for their emphasis on multicultural counseling. Meanwhile, the most popular counseling degree programs in California often offer specialized tracks in school, marriage, and family counseling. If you’re based in the Midwest, the best-ranked counseling degree programs in Chicago blend urban clinical experience with academic rigor. Additionally, many seek out popular counseling programs in Colorado for their innovative approaches to mental health and emphasis on community wellness.

Whether your interest lies in clinical roles, research, or educational settings, online degrees and regional counseling programs help you build the skills needed for a rewarding career in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Megan E. Patrick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles