World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 36 9191 8811 3295 3056 56 4295

Louise Paquet publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Louise Paquet between 1994 and 2017, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Louise Paquet published across 24 years, from 1994 to 2017, averaging 2.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 2004. 2 of the 57 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2017. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 2004. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 1 publication 2010: 0 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 2 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 1 publication
1994 2017

57 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Louise Paquet: publications per year, 1994 to 2017
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 2
1996 1
1997 0
1998 3
1999 5
2000 3
2001 4
2002 6
2003 6
2004 7
2005 4
2006 1
2007 0
2008 1
2009 1
2010 0
2011 3
2012 2
2013 2
2014 1
2015 2
2016 1
2017 1
Total 57
Download as CSV

Louise Paquet publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Louise Paquet sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 51–60 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 56 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62 56
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Louise Paquet D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Louise Paquet sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206 36
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Louise Paquet is affiliated with the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine in the United States. This association places them within a significant institution concerned with advancing and disseminating scientific knowledge.

Current publicly available data does not list specific research papers authored by Louise Paquet, nor details regarding their frequent co-authors or common venues for publication. There is also no available information on book publications linked to their name.

Similarly, there are no recorded details concerning their main fields of study, subfields, or primary research topics.

No awards or formal recognitions have been documented for Louise Paquet in the available records.

This profile represents a factual overview based solely on the accessible data regarding Louise Paquet's academic and research career as recorded at this time.

Best Publications

  • Characterization of metabolites during biodegradation of hexahydro-1, 3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX) with municipal anaerobic sludge.

    Jalal Hawari;Annamaria Halasz;Tamara Sheremata;Sylvie Beaudet

  • Detection of explosives and their degradation products in soil environments

    A Halasz;C Groom;E Zhou;L Paquet

  • Biosynthesis of 3-Dimethylsulfoniopropionate in Wollastonia biflora (L.) DC. (Evidence That S-Methylmethionine Is an Intermediate)

    A. D. Hanson;J. Rivoal;L. Paquet;D. A. Gage

  • Characterization of Metabolites in the Biotransformation of 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene with Anaerobic Sludge: Role of Triaminotoluene

    Jalal Hawari;A. Halasz;L. Paquet;E. Zhou

  • The Fate of the Cyclic Nitramine Explosive RDX in Natural Soil

    Tamara W. Sheremata;Annamaria Halasz;Louise Paquet;Sonia Thiboutot

  • Biotransformation of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene with Phanerochaete chrysosporium in agitated cultures at pH 4.5.

    Jalal Hawari;Annamaria Halasz;Sylvie Beaudet;Louise Paquet

  • Environmental fate of 2,4-dinitroanisole (DNAN) and its reduced products.

    J. Hawari;F. Monteil-Rivera;N.N. Perreault;A. Halasz

  • Development of a soil extraction procedure for ecotoxicity characterization of energetic compounds.

    Geoffrey I. Sunahara;Sabine Dodard;Manon Sarrazin;Louise Paquet

  • Biodegradation of Hexahydro-1,3,5-Trinitro-1,3,5-Triazine and Its Mononitroso Derivative Hexahydro-1-Nitroso-3,5-Dinitro-1,3,5-Triazine by Klebsiella pneumoniae Strain SCZ-1 Isolated from an Anaerobic Sludge

    Jian-Shen Zhao;Annamaria Halasz;Louise Paquet;Chantale Beaulieu

  • Ecotoxicological assessment of a high energetic and insensitive munitions compound: 2,4-Dinitroanisole (DNAN)

    Sabine G. Dodard;Manon Sarrazin;Jalal Hawari;Louise Paquet

  • Biotransformation of Hexahydro-1,3,5-Trinitro-1,3,5-Triazine (RDX) by a Rabbit Liver Cytochrome P450: Insight into the Mechanism of RDX Biodegradation by Rhodococcus sp. Strain DN22

    Bharat Bhushan;Sandra Trott;Jim C. Spain;Annamaria Halasz

  • Physico-chemical measurements of CL-20 for environmental applications. Comparison with RDX and HMX.

    Fanny Monteil-Rivera;Louise Paquet;Stéphane Deschamps;Vimal K. Balakrishnan

  • TNT, RDX, and HMX decrease earthworm (Eisenia andrei) life-cycle responses in a spiked natural forest soil.

    P. Y. Robidoux;J. Hawari;G. Bardai;L. Paquet

  • Insights into the formation and degradation mechanisms of methylenedinitramine during the incubation of RDX with anaerobic sludge.

    Annamaria Halasz;Jim Spain;Louise Paquet;Chantale Beaulieu

  • Shewanella sediminis sp. nov., a novel Na+-requiring and hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine-degrading bacterium from marine sediment.

    Jian-Shen Zhao;Dominic Manno;Chantale Beaulieu;Louise Paquet

  • Microwave-assisted extraction of lignin from triticale straw: Optimization and microwave effects

    Fanny Monteil-Rivera;Guang Hai Huang;Louise Paquet;Stéphane Deschamps

  • Solvent-free catalyst-free microwave-assisted acylation of lignin

    Fanny Monteil-Rivera;Louise Paquet

  • Biotransformation Routes of Octahydro-1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetrazocine by Municipal Anaerobic Sludge

    Jalal Hawari;Annamaria Halasz;Sylvie Beaudet;Louise Paquet

  • Metabolism of hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine through initial reduction to hexahydro-1-nitroso-3,5-dinitro-1,3,5-triazine followed by denitration in Clostridium bifermentans HAW-1

    J.-S. Zhao;L. Paquet;A. Halasz;J. Hawari

  • Photodegradation of RDX in aqueous solution: a mechanistic probe for biodegradation with Rhodococcus sp.

    J Hawari;A Halasz;C Groom;S Deschamps

  • Toxicity assessment of contaminated soils from an antitank firing range.

    Pierre Yves Robidoux;Ping Gong;Manon Sarrazin;Ghalib Bardai

  • Determination of explosives in environmental water samples by solid-phase microextraction-liquid chromatography.

    Fanny Monteil-Rivera;Chantale Beaulieu;Stéphane Deschamps;Louise Paquet

  • Effects and bioavailability of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene in spiked and field-contaminated soils to indigenous microorganisms

    Ping Gong;Steven D. Siciliano;Charles W. Greer;Louise Paquet

  • Phytotoxicity of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT) and octahydro-1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetrazocine (HMX) in spiked artificial and natural forest soils.

    P. Y. Robidoux;G. Bardai;L. Paquet;G. Ampleman

  • Fate of 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene and Its Metabolites in Natural and Model Soil Systems

    Tamara W. Sheremata;Sonia Thiboutot;Guy Ampleman;Louise Paquet

Frequent Co-Authors

Jalal Hawari
Jalal Hawari Polytechnique Montréal
Sonia Thiboutot
Sonia Thiboutot Defence Research and Development Canada
Guy Ampleman
Guy Ampleman Defence Research and Development Canada
Geoffrey I. Sunahara
Geoffrey I. Sunahara McGill University
Jim C. Spain
Jim C. Spain University of West Florida
Charles W. Greer
Charles W. Greer National Research Council Canada
Serge R. Guiot
Serge R. Guiot University of Montreal
Michael T. Montgomery
Michael T. Montgomery Naval Postgraduate School
Steven D. Siciliano
Steven D. Siciliano University of Saskatchewan
William W. Mohn
William W. Mohn University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students passionate about Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Many professionals consider advanced education such as a Doctor of Education (EdD) to expand leadership skills in environmental education or policy. If you prefer flexible options, there are excellent online ed d programs without dissertation that provide a streamlined path to earning an advanced degree.

When choosing a program, accreditation matters. You can find a comprehensive list of accredited eds to edd programs that ensure quality education and better career prospects. For those interested in social work aspects connected to environmental justice, dsw programs offer affordable and accessible options online.

Additionally, an online general studies degree affordable program can provide a broad interdisciplinary foundation, allowing students to tailor their studies to environmental issues alongside other relevant fields. This flexibility supports diverse environmental careers, from policy development to community advocacy.

Best Scientists Citing Louise Paquet

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles