What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
Charles W. Greer mainly focuses on Ecology, Botany, Soil microbiology, Microbial population biology and Bioremediation.
His Ecology study combines topics in areas such as Proteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria and Actinobacteria.
His research integrates issues of Soil contamination, Phytoremediation and Contaminated land in his study of Botany.
His Soil microbiology research incorporates elements of Environmental chemistry, Nutrient, Arctic and Soil respiration.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Tailings and Tributary in addition to Microbial population biology.
Charles W. Greer has researched Bioremediation in several fields, including Microorganism, Soil water and Biodegradation.
His most cited work include:
- Biodegradation of Variable-Chain-Length Alkanes at Low Temperatures by a Psychrotrophic Rhodococcus sp. (279 citations)
- Changes in microbial community composition and function during a polyaromatic hydrocarbon phytoremediation field trial (269 citations)
- The functional potential of high Arctic permafrost revealed by metagenomic sequencing, qPCR and microarray analyses. (220 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Charles W. Greer mostly deals with Ecology, Environmental chemistry, Botany, Biodegradation and Microbial population biology.
His studies link Temperature gradient gel electrophoresis with Ecology.
His studies deal with areas such as Soil water, Soil contamination, Contamination and Microorganism, Bacteria as well as Environmental chemistry.
His Botany research includes themes of Proteobacteria, Rhizosphere and Firmicutes.
His Biodegradation research includes elements of Bioremediation, Bioaugmentation, Microbiology and Bioreactor.
His Microbiology study incorporates themes from Gene and Biofilm.
He most often published in these fields:
- Ecology (33.49%)
- Environmental chemistry (26.15%)
- Botany (21.56%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?
- Environmental chemistry (26.15%)
- Biodegradation (16.97%)
- Rhizosphere (11.01%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His main research concerns Environmental chemistry, Biodegradation, Rhizosphere, Arctic and Ecology.
His Environmental chemistry research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Biofilm, Petroleum, Ecosystem and Microbial population biology.
His study in Biodegradation is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Seawater, Halophile, Microorganism and Environmental remediation.
His Rhizosphere research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Canola, Botany, Tailings, Edaphic and Nutrient.
His work deals with themes such as Permafrost, Carbon cycle, Betaproteobacteria, Fjord and Acidobacteria, which intersect with Arctic.
His Ecology study combines topics in areas such as Deltaproteobacteria, Verrucomicrobia and Gemmatimonadetes.
Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Canola Root-Associated Microbiomes in the Canadian Prairies. (30 citations)
- Soil contamination alters the willow root and rhizosphere metatranscriptome and the root–rhizosphere interactome (30 citations)
- Niche Separation Increases With Genetic Distance Among Bloom-Forming Cyanobacteria. (13 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
His primary areas of study are Rhizosphere, Microbiome, Microcosm, Environmental chemistry and Microcystis.
His Rhizosphere study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Plant nutrition, Agronomy and Botany.
His work on Conocybe is typically connected to Cytophagaceae as part of general Botany study, connecting several disciplines of science.
His work carried out in the field of Environmental chemistry brings together such families of science as Biodegradation, Thalassolituus and Bacteria.
His study explores the link between Abundance and topics such as Soil contamination that cross with problems in Soil microbiology.
His Soil water study is related to the wider topic of Ecology.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
