World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
72
Citations
17731
World Ranking
6331
National Ranking
229

John R. Lawrence publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John R. Lawrence sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 205 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

John R. Lawrence D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John R. Lawrence sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

John R. Lawrence is affiliated with Environment and Climate Change Canada. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science with significant contributions across related subfields including Molecular Biology, Ecology, Artificial Intelligence, Plant Science, and Materials Chemistry.

The main topics of their scientific work encompass:

  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Mycobacterium research and diagnosis
  • Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Metal Extraction and Bioleaching
  • Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls
  • Fungal Biology and Applications

Lawrence has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including Darren R. Korber (6 publications), G. D. W. Swerhone (2 publications), James J. Dynes (2 publications), Jordyn Bergsveinson (2 publications), and Julie Roy (2 publications).

Their work has appeared in various scientific venues, with multiple publications in these journals:

  • Microbiology Resource Announcements (2 publications)
  • Journal of Experimental Botany (1 publication)
  • Frontiers in Microbiology (1 publication)
  • Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal (1 publication)
  • Antibiotics (1 publication)

Selected recent papers by John R. Lawrence include:

  • Cold and exogenous calcium alter Allium fistulosum cell wall pectin to depress intracellular freezing temperatures, 2022, Journal of Experimental Botany
  • Metatranscriptomic Insights Into the Response of River Biofilm Communities to Ionic and Nano-Zinc Oxide Exposures, 2020, Frontiers in Microbiology
  • A health metadata-based management approach for comparative analysis of high-throughput genetic sequences for quantifying antimicrobial resistance reduction in Canadian hog barns, 2020, Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
  • Piglet Gut and in-Barn Manure from Farms on a Raised without Antibiotics Program Display Reduced Antimicrobial Resistance but an Increased Prevalence of Pathogens, 2021, Antibiotics
  • Draft Genome Sequence of Polaromonas eurypsychrophila AER18D-145, Isolated from a Uranium Tailings Management Facility in Northern Saskatchewan, Canada, 2022, Microbiology Resource Announcements

Best Publications

  • Optical sectioning of microbial biofilms.

    J R Lawrence;D R Korber;B D Hoyle;J W Costerton

  • Photodechlorination of PCB's in the presence of titanium dioxide in aqueous suspensions.

    John H. Carey;John Lawrence;Helle M. Tosine

  • Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA) for environmental development and transfer of antibiotic resistance.

    Nicholas J. Ashbolt;Alejandro Amézquita;Thomas Backhaus;Peter Borriello

  • Scanning Transmission X-Ray, Laser Scanning, and Transmission Electron Microscopy Mapping of the Exopolymeric Matrix of Microbial Biofilms

    J. R. Lawrence;G. D. W. Swerhone;G. G. Leppard;T. Araki

  • Multicellular organization in a degradative biofilm community

    G. M. Wolfaardt;G. M. Wolfaardt;J. R. Lawrence;R. D. Robarts;S. J. Caldwell

  • In situ localization of Azospirillum brasilense in the rhizosphere of wheat with fluorescently labeled, rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes and scanning confocal laser microscopy

    Bernhard Assmus;Peter Hutzler;Gudrun Kirchhof;Rudolf Amann

  • Soft X-ray Microscopy and Spectroscopy at the Molecular Environmental Science Beamline at the Advanced Light Source

    H. Bluhm;K. Andersson;K. Andersson;T. Araki;K. Benzerara

  • Confocal Laser Microscopy and Digital Image Analysis in Microbial Ecology

    Douglas E. Caldwell;Darren R. Korber;John R. Lawrence

  • Precipitation of amorphous CaCO3 (aragonite-like) by cyanobacteria: A STXM study of the influence of EPS on the nucleation process

    M. Obst;M. Obst;J.J. Dynes;J.J. Dynes;J.R. Lawrence;G.D.W. Swerhone

  • Ecotoxicological assessment of antibiotics: A call for improved consideration of microorganisms.

    Kristian K. Brandt;Alejandro Amézquita;Thomas Backhaus;Alistair B. Boxall

  • Assessment of lectin-binding analysis for in situ detection of glycoconjugates in biofilm systems.

    Thomas R. Neu;George D. W. Swerhone;John R. Lawrence

  • Development and structure of microbial biofilms in river water studied by confocal laser scanning microscopy

    Thomas R Neu;John R Lawrence

  • Selective degradation of ibuprofen and clofibric acid in two model river biofilm systems

    Marcus Winkler;John R Lawrence;Thomas R Neu

  • Sampling and Staining for Light Microscopy

    Terry J. Beveridge;John R. Lawrence;Robert G. E. Murray

  • Physiological Adaptations Involved in Alkane Assimilation at a Low Temperature by Rhodococcus sp. Strain Q15

    L G Whyte;S J Slagman;F Pietrantonio;L Bourbonnière

  • Advanced imaging techniques for assessment of structure, composition and function in biofilm systems

    Thomas R. Neu;Bertram Manz;Frank Volke;James J. Dynes;James J. Dynes

  • Next-generation sequencing of microbial communities in the Athabasca River and its tributaries in relation to oil sands mining activities.

    Etienne Yergeau;John R. Lawrence;Sylvie Sanschagrin;Marley J. Waiser

  • Determination of diffusion coefficients in biofilms by confocal laser microscopy.

    J. R. Lawrence;G. M. Wolfaardt;D. R. Korber

  • Phylogenetic Composition, Spatial Structure, and Dynamics of Lotic Bacterial Biofilms Investigated by Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization and Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy.

    W. Manz;K. Wendt-Potthoff;T.R. Neu;U. Szewzyk

  • Bacterial extracellular DNA forming a defined network-like structure.

    Uta Böckelmann;Andrea Janke;Ramona Kuhn;Thomas R. Neu

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas R. Neu
Thomas R. Neu Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Adam P. Hitchcock
Adam P. Hitchcock McMaster University
Charles W. Greer
Charles W. Greer National Research Council Canada
Tolek Tyliszczak
Tolek Tyliszczak Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Edward Topp
Edward Topp Agriculture and Agriculture-Food Canada
Etienne Yergeau
Etienne Yergeau Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Richard D. Robarts
Richard D. Robarts National Water Research Institute
Leonard I. Wassenaar
Leonard I. Wassenaar University of Ottawa
Lyle G. Whyte
Lyle G. Whyte McGill University
M. Jim Hendry
M. Jim Hendry University of Saskatchewan

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Advancing your studies in Biology and Biochemistry opens up a wide array of online degree options and career paths in the health and science sectors. Many top universities now offer flexible and accessible programs for students worldwide.

If your goal is a solid foundation in biological sciences, an online biology bachelor's degree provides broad knowledge that prepares you for research, laboratory work, and further professional study. Those interested in nursing can pursue online asn programs, which are designed to accelerate your pathway into clinical practice and licensed RN roles.

Nutrition and dietetics also offer meaningful career opportunities. The best online registered dietitian programs are structured to meet the requirements for professional certification, preparing graduates to work in healthcare, community, or food industries.

Those seeking leadership or administrative roles should explore cahme accredited mha programs. These programs focus on healthcare management, equipping students for a future as administrators, managers, or policymakers in medical facilities or biotech companies.

Best Scientists Citing John R. Lawrence

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles