Monitoring the Future, Substance abuse, Survey result, Young adult and Clinical psychology are his primary areas of study. His study in Monitoring the Future is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Alcohol abuse, Adolescent drug, Trend analysis and Key. His Adolescent drug research focuses on Process management and how it relates to Adolescent substance and Substance use prevention.
His research investigates the connection between Substance abuse and topics such as Drug that intersect with issues in Environmental health, Recreation and Social psychology. His Young adult study incorporates themes from Demography and Marital status. The study incorporates disciplines such as Illicit drug, Age differences and Educational attainment in addition to Clinical psychology.
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Monitoring the Future, Substance abuse, Environmental health, Young adult and Gerontology. With his scientific publications, his incorporates both Monitoring the Future and Survey result. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Alcohol abuse, Clinical psychology, Trend analysis, Key and Drug.
The various areas that Lloyd D. Johnston examines in his Environmental health study include Occupational safety and health and Public health. His research integrates issues of Higher education and Marital status in his study of Young adult. He has included themes like Marijuana use and Substance use in his Demography study.
His main research concerns Monitoring the Future, Environmental health, Demography, Survey result and Substance abuse. His Monitoring the Future research includes elements of Young adult, Gerontology, Ethnic group and Drug. In the field of Drug, his study on Adolescent drug overlaps with subjects such as Lysergic acid diethylamide.
His Demography study also includes
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.
Monitoring the Future: National Results on Adolescent Drug Use: Overview of Key Findings
Lloyd D. Johnston;Patrick M. O’Malley;Jerald G. Bachman.
FOCUS (2003)
Monitoring the Future National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975-2010. Volume II, College Students & Adults Ages 19-50.
Lloyd D. Johnston;Patrick M. O'Malley;Jerald G. Bachman;John E. Schulenberg.
Institute for Social Research (2011)
Monitoring the Future: National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975-2005. Volume 1: Secondary School Students, 2005. NIH Publication No. 06-5883.
Lloyd D. Johnston;Patrick M. O'Malley;Jerald G. Bachman;John E. Schulenberg.
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) (2006)
National Survey Results on Drug Use from the Monitoring the Future Study, 1975-1998. Volume I: Secondary School Students.
Lloyd D. Johnston;Patrick M. O'Malley;Jerald G. Bachman.
(1999)
National Survey Results on Drug Use from the Monitoring the Future Study, 1975-1997. Volume 1: Secondary School Students.
Lloyd D. Johnston;Patrick M. O'Malley;Jerald G. Bachman.
(1998)
National survey results on drug use from the Monitoring the Future study, 1975-1993. Volume I: Secondary school students.
L. D. Johnston;P. M. O’Malley;J. G. Bachman.
(1994)
National Survey Results on Drug Use from the Monitoring the Future Study, 1975-1995. Volume 1, Secondary School Students.
Lloyd D. Johnston;Patrick M. O'Malley;Jerald G. Bachman.
(1996)
Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2017: Overview, key findings on adolescent drug use
Lloyd D. Johnston;Richard A. Miech;Patrick M. O'Malley;Jerald G. Bachman.
University of Michigan. Institute for Social Research (2018)
Monitoring the Future National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975-2018: Overview, Key Findings on Adolescent Drug Use.
Lloyd D. Johnston;Richard A. Miech;Patrick M. O'Malley;Jerald G. Bachman.
Institute for Social Research (2019)
Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2007. Volume II: College students and adults ages 19-45
Lloyd D. Johnston;Patrick M. O'Malley;Jerald G. Bachman;John E. Schulenberg.
National Institutes of Health (2006)
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
University of Illinois at Chicago
Cancer Council Victoria
University of Southern California
RTI International
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
RIKEN
Polish Academy of Sciences
Stanford University
Indiana University
Hamamatsu University
Chinese Academy of Sciences
University of California, Davis
Washington University in St. Louis
University College Dublin
University of Maine
University of South Florida
Université Libre de Bruxelles
University of Iowa
Catholic University of Korea
University of Ulm
Northwestern University